ASCD 2017 EdLeader21 presentation
-
Upload
eschneider1212 -
Category
Education
-
view
212 -
download
1
Transcript of ASCD 2017 EdLeader21 presentation
Assessment for Learning: Putting Students at the CenterMarch 27, 2017
© 2017 EdLeader21
Valerie GreenhillPresident, EdLeader21
Marisa Sarian Assistant Superintendent for Secondary Education, Pasadena Unified School District
Eric SchneiderAssistant Superintendent for Instruction, Minnetonka Public
Schools
© 2017 EdLeader21
Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes
Source: OECD
© 2017 EdLeader21
Which student would you choose?
Social Studies
.
Social Studies
English
Science
Math
Student A
Content Mastery
Critical Thinker
Effective Communicator
Effective Collaborator
Creative & Innovative
Financially Literate
Problem Solver
Globally Competent
Student B
© 2017 EdLeader21
ProfileofaGraduate.org
www.ProfileofaGraduate.org
Fairfax County
© 2017 EdLeader21
ProfileofaGraduate.org
© 2017 EdLeader21
ProfileofaGraduate.org
Communication
Collaboration
Creativity &Innovation
GlobalAwareness
Critical Thinking & Problem Solving
Productivity& Accountability
© 2017 EdLeader21
Virginia Student-Led Assessment NIC
10 Districts
© 2017 EdLeader21
PDSA Planning Change Idea: “Write 1 Question an 8th Grader Would have”Who is testing: Ms. Brown & Ms. Allen Goal of test: To evaluate potential misunderstandings in complex content
Questions: What do we want to learn
from this cycle?
Data: What data or information will you collect to answer
our questions?
Predictions: What do you think will happen?
Results: What were the results?
What did we learn?
Does using this strategy improve feedback loop compared to asking, “Any questions?”
Questions asked by students
Students will ask questions significantly more impactful toward conceptual understanding, allowing the teacher an opportunity to deepen understanding.
TBA
© 2017 EdLeader21
PDSA PlanningChange Idea: Develop and implement a protocol that will be used daily in student/teacher conferencingWho is testing: Sherell Hodge and Kim DraperGoal of test: Have an effective protocol that will allow kindergarten and 1st grade students to communicate their reading goal and strategies effectively.
Questions: What do we want to learn
from this cycle?
Data: What data or information will
you collect to answer our questions?
Predictions: What do you think will happen?
Results: What were the results?
What did we learn?
Does using this strategy improve feedback loop compared to asking, “Any questions?”
Questions asked by students
Students will ask questions significantly more impactful toward conceptual understanding, allowing the teacher an opportunity to deepen understanding.
TBA
PUSD GRADUATE PORTFOLIO & DEFENSE
Marisa Sarian, Ph.D.Assistant Superintendent, Secondary [email protected](626)396-3600 x.88216
20
21
“WHAT GETS MEASURED, GETS DONE”
22
• Old way:– Teacher as Expert– ‘Content is King’– Assessment for evaluation– Standardized testing
• New way:– Teacher as Learning Guide– Deeper Learning competencies*– Non-cognitive skills & mindset– Assessment for learning– Performance Assessment
*http://www.hewlett.org/library/deeper-learning-defined/
DEFENSE DRIVES SCHOOL REDESIGN
23
Portfolio
Grad Profile
Student Defense
Performance Assessments
Site Coordinator
Advisory Systems
Cycles of Inquiry
Project-BasedLearning
PART I: GRADUATE DEFENSE
24
PART II: DEFENSE OF LEARNING: ORAL COMMUNICATION PRESENTATION
25
IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX
26
27
SITE COORDINATOR DUTIES & RESPONSIBILITIES
2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019
▪ Attend 2hr. Meeting after school once a month▪ Communicate expectations and outcomes w/ 9th
ELA and 10th World History▪ Become the expert on Graduate Portfolio and
defense requirements (including: uploading evidence to Naviance)
▪ Assist AP to coordinate calibration of scoring w/ rubrics
▪ Communicate with teachers regarding the Matrix (Including assignments that need to be scored with portfolio rubrics
▪ Work with department chairs to create implementation guide for using Senior Defense rubrics
▪ Attend 2hr. Meeting after school once a month▪ Communicate expectations and outcomes w/ 9th
ELA and 10th World History▪ Become the expert on Graduate Portfolio and
defense requirements (including: uploading evidence to Naviance)
▪ Assist AP to coordinate calibration of scoring w/ rubrics
▪ Communicate with teachers regarding the Matrix (Including assignments that need to be scored with portfolio rubrics
▪ Work with department chairs to create implementation guide for using Senior Defense rubrics
▪ Review uploaded materials from Naviance w/ AP and Dept. Chairs
▪ During extra prep period(s), schedule meetings w/ ALL 11th graders to review portfolios (and create plan of action by the end of 1st semester)
▪ Meet w/ 11th grade students who were short at the end of 1st semester
▪ Attend 2hr. Meeting after school once a month▪ Communicate expectations and outcomes w/ 9th
ELA and 10th World History▪ Become the expert on Graduate Portfolio and
defense requirements (including: uploading evidence to Naviance)
▪ Assist AP to coordinate calibration of scoring w/ rubrics
▪ Communicate with teachers regarding the Matrix (Including assignments that need to be scored with portfolio rubrics
▪ Work with department chairs to create implementation guide for using Senior Defense rubrics
▪ Schedule Senior Presentations▪ Organize Panel of Judges
Comprehensive High Schools*$2,000 stipend p/semester
Comprehensive High Schools*$1,000 stipend p/semester
*ONE release period per/200 students in the 12th grade
Comprehensive High Schools*$2,000 stipend p/semester
PLUS* ONE release period per/200 students in the 12th
grade
*Accommodations will be made tomeet the needs of Alternative Ed
*Accommodations will be made tomeet the needs of Alternative Ed
*Accommodations will be made tomeet the needs of Alternative Ed
RUBRIC #1 – RESEARCHScoring Domain Does Not Meet Standard Meets Standard (Pass)
Exceeds Standard (Pass with
Distinction) ✔
Argument
• Argument is unclear or underdeveloped• Makes unclear or irrelevant claims• Discussion of counter-claims is unclear or absent• Does not explain background and context of topic/issue• Does not draw conclusions
• Makes a clear, well developed, and convincing argument that demonstrates original critical thinking• Makes relevant and significant claims that support the argument• Acknowledges and responds counter- claims• Thoroughly explains background and context of topic/issue• Makes insightful connections, draws meaningful conclusions
Cites Sources(3 or more sources)
• Refers to evidence from few sources; some sources may not be relevant• Limited use of information and/or examples • Makes note of a general difference in perspectives on a topic without specific details (when appropriate)
• Refers to extensive and comprehensive evidence (print/digital) relevant to argument• Information and/or examples are used to illustrate and justify the argument• Weighs and evaluates inconsistent information and differences among authors on the same topic (when appropriate)
Evidence
• Restates information from multiple sources• Expresses broad agreement with a source's perspective without assessing the strength or limitation the source.
• Synthesizes and critiques evidence from multiple sources related to the argument• Assesses the strengths and limitations of most important sources to support or refute the argument or claims (when appropriate)
Organization
∙ Argument is unclear or not evident throughout the text • Ideas are disorganized, underdeveloped, or loosely sequenced• No transitions are used
∙ Argument is presented clearly and consistently • Ideas are fully developed and logically sequenced to present a coherent whole • Transitions guide the reader through the development and reasoning of the claim
Language
∙ Has limited control of syntax and vocabulary• Has an accumulation of errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics that distracts or interferes with meaning
• Has an effective fluent style with variety in syntax, precise word choice• Is free from errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics
RUBRIC #2 – CREATIVITY & INNOVATION
Scoring Domain
Does Not Meet Standard
Meets Standard (Pass)
Exceeds Standard (Passes with
Distinction) ✔
Point of View ∙ The product is characterized by an incomplete and limited application of the tools, material and artistic conventions of its particular artistic medium ∙ The student has not experimented with tools, materials or artistic conventions.
∙ The product presents a specific point of view∙ The student can clearly articulate the intent of the work orally or in written form.
Originality ∙The product relies on existing models, ideas, or directions; it is not new or unique ∙The product follows rules and conventions; uses materials and ideas in typical ways
∙The product is new, unique, surprising; shows a personal touch ∙The product may successfully break rules and conventions, or use common materials or ideas in new, clever and surprising ways
Value ∙The product is not useful or valuable to the intended audience/user ∙The product would not work in the real world; impractical or unfeasible
∙The product is seen as useful and valuable; it solves the defined problem or meets the identified need∙The product is practical, feasible
Style ∙The product is safe, ordinary, made in a conventional style ∙The product has several elements that do not fit together; it is a mish-mash
∙The product is well-crafted, striking, designed with a distinct style but still appropriate for the purpose ∙The product combines different elements into a coherent whole
Reflection ∙ The student describes her/his technique and method in a basic way. ∙ The student evaluates the work using only personal and emotional responses.
∙ The student uses appropriate vocabulary and principles to describe the work and the process of developing and creating the work or product ∙ The student evaluates the work using emotional response as well as cultural information, art practice conventions and/or arts standards.
RUBRIC #3 – WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
Scoring Domain Does Not Meet Standard Meets Standard (Pass) Exceeds Standard (Pass with Distinction) ✔
Argument ∙ Thesis is missing or unclear∙ Draws general or broad connections or conclusions
∙ Presents a clear and well-developed argument/thesis∙ Makes specific connections∙ Makes specific connections and draws logical conclusions that follow from the argument/thesis
Counter Claim ∙ One claim dominates the argument and alternative or counter-claims are absent
∙ Acknowledges questions, counter-claims, or alternative interpretations when appropriate
Thesis ∙ Relies on one or two reasons, examples, or quotations relevant to argument/thesis
∙ Refers to sufficient and detailed evidence (reasons, examples, and quotations) relevant to argument/thesis
Sources ∙ One source dominates the argument ∙ Information from source is presented as fact and source
∙ Compares the point of view of two or more sources∙ Evaluates points of view, purposes or other context information to assess credibility of sources
Organization ∙ Argument/thesis is unclear or not evident throughout the text ∙ Ideas are disorganized, underdeveloped, or loosely sequenced ∙ No transitions are used
∙ Argument/thesis is presented clearly and consistently throughout text ∙ Ideas are developed and logically sequenced ∙ Transitions connect ideas
Language Use ∙ Has limited control of syntax and vocabulary ∙ Language and tone are inappropriate to the purpose and audience ∙ Has an accumulation of errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics that distracts or interferes with meaning
∙ Demonstrates varied syntax and effective word choice∙ Language and tone are appropriate to the purpose and audience ∙ Is generally free of distracting errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics
Cites Sources ∙ Textual citation is missing, incorrect or inappropriately used
∙ Cites textual evidence appropriately, consistently and accurately
RUBRIC #4 – ORAL COMMUNICATION/ PRESENTATION
Scoring Domain Does Not Meet Standard Meets Standard (Pass) Exceeds Standard (Pass with
Distinction) ✔
Explanation of Ideas &
Information
∙ Does not present information, arguments, ideas, or
findings clearly, concisely, and logically; argument lacks supporting evidence; audience cannot follow the line of reasoning
∙ Uses a style or information that is inappropriate to the purpose, task, and audience (may be too much or too little information, or the wrong approach)
∙ Does not address alternative or opposing perspectives (if applicable)
∙ Presents information, findings, arguments and
supporting evidence clearly, concisely, and logically; audience can follow the line of reasoning
∙ Selects information, develops ideas and uses a style appropriate to the purpose, task, and audience
∙ Addresses alternative or opposing perspectives (if applicable)
Organization
∙ Does not meet requirements for what should be included in the presentation
∙ Does not have an introduction and/or conclusion, ∙ Uses time poorly; the whole presentation, or a part
of it, is too short or too long
∙ Meets all requirements for what should be included in the presentation
∙ Has a clear introduction and conclusion ∙ Organizes time well; no part of the
presentation is too short or too long
Eyes & Body
∙ Does not look at audience; reads notes or slides ∙ Lacks poise and confidence (fidgets, slouches,
appears nervous) ∙ Wears clothing inappropriate for the occasion
∙ Keeps eye contact with audience most of the time; only glances at notes or slides
∙ Looks poised and confident∙ Wears clothing appropriate for the occasion
Voice
∙ Mumbles or speaks too quickly or slowly∙ Speaks too softly to be understood∙ Frequently uses “filler” words (“uh, um, so, and,
like, etc.”)∙ Does demonstrate command of formal English
∙ Speaks clearly; not too quickly or slowly∙ Speaks loudly enough for everyone to hear;
changes tone and pace to maintain interest ∙ Rarely uses filler words (“uh, um, so, and,
like, etc.”)∙ Demonstrating command of formal English
Presentation Aids
∙ Does not use audio/visual aids or media ∙ Attempts to use one or a few audio/visual aids or
media, but they do not add to or may distract from the presentation
∙ Uses audio/visual aids or media to enhance understanding of findings, reasoning, and evidence, and to add interest
∙ Seamlessly audio/visual aids or media into the presentation
Response to Audience Questions
∙ Does not address audience questions (goes off topic or misunderstands without seeking clarification)
∙ Answers audience questions clearly ∙ Seeks clarification, admits “I don’t know” or
explains how the answer might be found when unable to answer a question
© 2017 EdLeader21
Insert Eric’s Slides Here■Minnetonka’s “Profile of a Graduate” is called the Minnetonka Teaching and Learning Instructional Framework
■For each of our eight dimensions, there is a definition, four levels of complexity, and a guiding document with examples from various content areas and school levels
Profile of a Graduate
Eric SchneiderAssistant SuperintendentMinnetonka Public [email protected]
Link to Authentic and
Real-World Learning
Guide
Link to Overview Document
Semester at a Glance
Link to Minnetonka’s UbD template
Link to Minnetonka’s UbD rubric*
*Still in beta!
© 2017 EdLeader21
Q&A
© 2017 EdLeader21
Download Creativity Rubric
FREE Creativity Rubric Download
www.edleader21.com/rubric
Promo code for today: ASCD17
© 2017 EdLeader21
Thank You!Valerie [email protected]@val_green
Eric [email protected]
Marisa [email protected]