C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

35
VOTACIÓN PRESIDENCIAL

description

123

Transcript of C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

Page 1: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

VOTACIÓN PRESIDENCIAL

Page 2: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF ANTIOQUIA

porcentage number of votesSantos 45.3% 855.864Mockus 20.89% 394.592Vargas 13.48% 254.554Sanín 9.21% 174.136En Blanco 2.3% 43.724Voto Nulo 1.51% 28.427

Page 3: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF ATLÁNTICO

porcentage number of votesSantos 37.29% 189.702Mockus 23.27% 118.411Vargas 15.06% 76.638Sanín 13.03% 66.276En Blanco 0.95% 4.816Voto Nulo 0.78% 4.029

Page 4: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF BOLÍVAR

porcentage number of votesSantos 56.24% 276.710Mockus 16.67% 82.008Vargas 13.96% 68.699Sanín 7.11% 34.972En Blanco 1.06% 5.205Voto Nulo 0.87% 4.280

Page 5: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF BOYACA porcentage number of votesSantos 51.69% 244.853 Mockus 22.39% 106.058Vargas 8.61% 40.799Sanín 5.94% 28.161En Blanco 1.29% 6.130Voto Nulo 1.12% 5.319

Page 6: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF CALDAS porcentage number of votesSantos 43.95% 172.459Mockus 19.41% 76.214Vargas 12.61% 49.467Sanín 12.13% 47.601En Blanco 1.96% 7.700Voto Nulo 2.36% 9.278

Page 7: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF CAUCA

porcentage number of votesSantos 35.9% 123.661Mockus 28.44% 97.984Vargas 11.25% 38.766Sanín 9.66% 33.274En Blanco 2.14% 7.359Voto Nulo 1.86% 6.415

Page 8: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF CESAR

porcentage number of votesSantos 56.24% 148.920Mockus 19.89% 52.669Vargas 10.66% 28.229Sanín 5.24% 13.874En Blanco 1.17% 3.090Voto Nulo 0.87% 2.294

Page 9: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF CÓRDOBA

porcentage number of votesSantos 48.36% 216.106Mockus 17.02% 76.033Vargas 14.87% 66.460Sanín 11.11% 49.628En Blanco 0.97% 4.340Voto Nulo 0.89% 3.988

Page 10: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF CUNDINAMARCA

porcentage number of votesSantos 57.13% 507.746Mockus 16.61% 147.659Vargas 9.11% 81.003Sanín 6.5% 57.775En Blanco 1.35% 12.006Voto Nulo 1.29% 11.429

Page 11: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF CHOCO

porcentage number of votesSantos 52.48% 45.274Mockus 27.07% 23.358Vargas 6.43% 5.653Sanín 5.34% 4.610En Blanco 2.04% 1.755Voto Nulo 2.06% 1.778

Page 12: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF HUILA

porcentage number of votesSantos 60.6% 202.594Mockus 16.84% 56.297Vargas 5.97% 19.958Sanín 5.81% 19.448En Blanco 1.19% 4.976Voto Nulo 0.94% 3.142

Page 13: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF NARIÑO

porcentage number of votesSantos 48.36% 216.106Mockus 17.02% 76.033Vargas 14.87% 66.460Sanín 11.11% 49.628En Blanco 0.97% 4.340Voto Nulo 0.89% 3.988

Page 14: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPÀRTMENT OF PUTUMAYO

porcentage number of votesSantos 23.35% 19.224Mockus 28.9% 20.838Vargas 9.05% 16.840Sanín 11.03% 6.525En Blanco 1.87% 11.350Voto Nulo 0.65% 781

Page 15: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF RISARALDA

porcentage number of votesSantos 48.33% 171.411Mockus 23.36% 79.313Vargas 10.11% 35.872Sanín 8.68% 30.785En Blanco 2% 7.136Voto Nulo 1.8% 6.395

Page 16: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF NORTE DE SANTANDER

porcentage number of votesSantos 54.09% 246.355Mockus 14.41% 88.451Vargas 9.49% 43.231Sanín 6.07% 27.658En Blanco 1.23% 5.622Voto Nulo 1.14% 5.202

Page 17: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARMENT OF QUINDIO

porcentage number of votesSantos 48.57% 103.866Mockus 22.5% 48.126Vargas 10.87% 23.243Sanín 6.9% 13.890En Blanco 1.99% 4.258Voto Nulo 1.95% 4.164

Page 18: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF SANTANDER

porcentage number of votesSantos 43.48% 334.265Mockus 23.77% 182.754Vargas 11.73% 90.259Sanín 7.18% 55.172En Blanco 1.36% 10.462Voto Nulo 1.05% 8.063

Page 19: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF SUCRE

porcentage number of votesSantos 54.58% 145.967Mockus 24.66% 65.934Vargas 8.7% 23.286Sanín 4.92% 13.148En Blanco 0.74% 1.980Voto Nulo 0.88% 2.341

Page 20: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF TOLIMA

porcentage number of votesSantos 58.47% 283.376Mockus 16.55% 80.251Vargas 7.19% 34.832Sanín 5.39% 26.131En Blanco 1.6% 7.742Voto Nulo 1.25% 6.071

Page 21: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF VALLE DEL CAUCA

porcentage number of votesSantos 37.78% 513.083Mockus 27.82% 377.891Vargas 9.68% 131.582Sanín 9.68% 131.525En Blanco 2.06% 28.110Voto Nulo 1.36% 18.425

Page 22: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF VICHADA

porcentage number of votesSantos 58.97% 5.925Mockus 20.63% 2.039Vargas 6.01% 594Sanín 5.35% 529En Blanco 1.02% 101Voto Nulo 0.61% 60

Page 23: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF VAUPEZ

porcentage number of votesSantos 38.99% 1.853Mockus 25.67% 1.220Vargas 14.26% 678Sanín 7.7% 366En Blanco 0.84% 40Voto Nulo 0.65% 31

Page 24: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF AMAZONAS

porcentage number of votesSantos 38.6% 5.753Mockus 27.39% 4.083Vargas 9.45% 1.408Sanín 8.98% 1.339En Blanco 1.47% 219Voto Nulo 1.14% 170

Page 25: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF SAN ANDRES

porcentage number of votesSantos 51.56% 6.314Mockus 28.27% 3.463Vargas 5.14% 630Sanín 4.6 % 564En Blanco 1.61% 197Voto Nulo 0.6% 74

Page 26: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF GUAVIARE

porcentage number of votesSantos 56.17% 9.501Mockus 23.33% 4.361Vargas 7.38% 1.379Sanín 4.26 % 797En Blanco 1.92% 359Voto Nulo 1.39% 259

Page 27: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF META

porcentage number of votesSantos 61.78% 183.224Mockus 17.89% 53.066Vargas 8.89% 26.382Sanín 4.38% 12.984En Blanco 1.23% 3.637Voto Nulo 0.95% 2.826

Page 28: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF GUAINIA

porcentage number of votesSantos 49.28% 3.203Mockus 23.25% 1.511Vargas 14.05% 913Sanín 4.45% 289En Blanco 1.6% 104Voto Nulo 1.06% 69

Page 29: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF MAGDALENA

porcentage number of votesSantos 56.5% 183.757Mockus 18.85% 61.306Vargas 11.5% 37.394Sanín 4.68% 15.233En Blanco 1.01% 3.300Voto Nulo 0.84% 2.731

Page 30: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF CASANARE

porcentage number of votesSantos 75.23% 96.270Mockus 12.41% 15.887Vargas 5.42% 6.938Sanín 2.68% 3.425En Blanco 1.2% 1.540Voto Nulo 0.83% 1.60

Page 31: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF CAQUETÁ

porcentage number of votesSantos 59.01% 53.120Mockus 17.45% 15.708Vargas 7.37% 6.630Sanín 4.59% 4.142En Blanco 2.58% 2.324Voto Nulo 0.78% 713

Page 32: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

DEPARTMENT OF ARAUCA

porcentage number of votesSantos 59.05% 33.257Mockus 17.67% 9.953Vargas 7.67% 4.318Sanín 7 % 3.943En Blanco 2.23% 1.256Voto Nulo 1.38% 778

Page 33: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

TOTALES

Santos = 5,599.719 Mockus = 2,423.471 Vargas = 1,283.095 Sanin = 927.828 En Blanco = 195.178 Voto Nulo = 143.680

Page 34: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

ESTADISTICAS

Page 35: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales

Conclutions My conclutions were that with all the votes that

joined santos of th partido cambio radical,the partido conservador,and partido liberal Mockus only with the people that goes with him he can not win.If he want towin he has to propose for his campain things that people like to do :for example santos said that he dont want to raise the impuestos because the economy is good and people dont like to pay impuestos so thats a check for santos.Mockus proposed to raise up the impuestos because economy is Good.but dont apologise that propose because people dont like to pay impuestos so he has to do something to attract cambio radical,partido conservador and partido Liberal.witha that votes he can win.