ch2
-
Upload
denish-vaniyawala -
Category
Recruiting & HR
-
view
104 -
download
0
description
Transcript of ch2
1
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie CookPowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook
The University of West AlabamaThe University of West Alabama
1
Human Resource Human Resource
ManagementManagementELEVENTH EDITIONELEVENTH EDITION
G A R Y D E S S L E RG A R Y D E S S L E R
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
All rights reserved.All rights reserved.
Equal Opportunity and the LawEqual Opportunity and the Law
Chapter 2Chapter 2
Part 1 | IntroductionPart 1 | Introduction
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–2
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1.1. Cite the main features of at least five employment Cite the main features of at least five employment
discrimination laws.discrimination laws.
2.2. Define Define adverse impactadverse impact and explain how it is proved and explain how it is proved
and what its significance is.and what its significance is.
3.3. Explain and illustrate two defenses you can use in the Explain and illustrate two defenses you can use in the
event of discriminatory practice allegations.event of discriminatory practice allegations.
4.4. Avoid employment discrimination problems.Avoid employment discrimination problems.
5.5. Cite specific discriminatory personnel management Cite specific discriminatory personnel management
practices in recruitment, selection, promotion, transfer, practices in recruitment, selection, promotion, transfer,
layoffs, and benefits.layoffs, and benefits.
6.6. Define and discuss Define and discuss diversity managementdiversity management..
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–3
Equal Employment Opportunity 1964Equal Employment Opportunity 1964––19911991
Title VII of the 1964
Civil Rights ActEEOC
Executive Orders11246, 11375
OFCCP
Equal Pay Act
of 1963
Age Discrimination
in Employment Act
of 1967
Vocational
Rehabilitation Act
of 1973
Pregnancy
Discrimination Act
of 1978
Federal Agency
Guidelines
Equal
Employment
Opportunity
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–4
Early Court Decisions Regarding Early Court Decisions Regarding
Equal Employment OpportunityEqual Employment Opportunity
1
Business necessity is a defense for adverse impact.
Employer’s intent is irrelevant.
Griggs v. Duke Power Company
Burden of proof is on the employer.
“Fair in form” practice must also be nondiscriminatory.
2
3
4
Test or practice must be related to job performance.5
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–5
Early Court Decisions Regarding Early Court Decisions Regarding
Equal Employment Opportunity (cont’d)Equal Employment Opportunity (cont’d)
•• Albemarle Paper Company v. MoodyAlbemarle Paper Company v. Moody
�� If a test is used to screen candidates, then the job’s If a test is used to screen candidates, then the job’s
specific duties and responsibilities must be analyzed specific duties and responsibilities must be analyzed
and documented.and documented.
�� The performance standards for the job should be The performance standards for the job should be
clear and unambiguous.clear and unambiguous.
�� Federal guidelines on validation are to be used for Federal guidelines on validation are to be used for
validating employment practices.validating employment practices.
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–6
Equal Employment Opportunity Equal Employment Opportunity
19901990––9191––presentpresent
Civil Rights Act
of 1991
Burden of ProofDisparate Impact
Mixed MotivesDesert Palace Inc.
v. Costa
Money DamagesCompensatory
Punitive
2
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–7
Equal Employment Opportunity Equal Employment Opportunity
19901990––9191––present (cont’d)present (cont’d)
AIDS
Qualified Individual
Reasonable Accommodation
Employer Defenses
Americans with
Disabilities Act
(ADA) of 1990
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–8
Employer Obligations Under ADAEmployer Obligations Under ADA
•• An employer must make a reasonable accommodation for An employer must make a reasonable accommodation for
a qualified disabled individual unless doing so would result a qualified disabled individual unless doing so would result
in undue hardship.in undue hardship.
•• Employers are not required to lower existing performance Employers are not required to lower existing performance
standards or stop using tests for a job.standards or stop using tests for a job.
•• Employers may ask preEmployers may ask pre--employment questions about essential employment questions about essential
job functions but can not make inquiries about disability.job functions but can not make inquiries about disability.
•• Medical exams (or testing) for current employees must be Medical exams (or testing) for current employees must be
jobjob--related.related.
•• Employers should review job application forms, interview Employers should review job application forms, interview
procedures, and job descriptions for illegal questions and procedures, and job descriptions for illegal questions and
statements.statements.
•• Employers should have upEmployers should have up--toto--date job descriptions that identify date job descriptions that identify
the current essential functions of the job.the current essential functions of the job.
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–9
Disabilities and ADADisabilities and ADA
•• Courts will tend to define “disabilities” quite narrowly.Courts will tend to define “disabilities” quite narrowly.
•• Employers are not required to tolerate misconduct Employers are not required to tolerate misconduct
or erratic performance, even if the behaviors can be or erratic performance, even if the behaviors can be
attributed to the disability.attributed to the disability.
•• Employers do not have to create a new job for the Employers do not have to create a new job for the
disabled worker nor reassign that person to a lightdisabled worker nor reassign that person to a light--duty duty
position for an indefinite period, unless such a position position for an indefinite period, unless such a position
exists.exists.
•• Employers should not treat employees as if they are Employers should not treat employees as if they are
disabled so that they will not be “regarded as” disabled disabled so that they will not be “regarded as” disabled
and protected under the ADA.and protected under the ADA.
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–10
State and Local Equal Employment State and Local Equal Employment
Opportunity LawsOpportunity Laws
•• State and Local LawsState and Local Laws
�� Cannot conflict with federal law but can extend Cannot conflict with federal law but can extend
coverage to additional protected groups.coverage to additional protected groups.
�� The EEOC can defer a discrimination charge to state The EEOC can defer a discrimination charge to state
and local agencies that have comparable jurisdiction.and local agencies that have comparable jurisdiction.
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–11
Title VII: Sexual HarassmentTitle VII: Sexual Harassment
•• Sexual HarassmentSexual Harassment
�� Harassment on the basis of sex that has the purpose Harassment on the basis of sex that has the purpose
or effect of substantially interfering with a person’s or effect of substantially interfering with a person’s
work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile,
or offensive work environment.or offensive work environment.
��Employers have an affirmative duty to maintain Employers have an affirmative duty to maintain
workplaces free of sexual harassment and workplaces free of sexual harassment and
intimidation.intimidation.
•• Federal Violence Against Women Act of 1994Federal Violence Against Women Act of 1994
�� A person who commits a violent crime motivated by A person who commits a violent crime motivated by
gender is liable to the party injured.gender is liable to the party injured.
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–12
Proving Sexual HarassmentProving Sexual Harassment
Proving Sexual
Harassment
Quid Pro Quo
Hostile Environment
Created by
Co-Workers or
Nonemployees
Hostile Environment
Created by
Supervisors
3
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–13
TABLE 2–2 Summary of Important Equal Employment Opportunity Actions
Title VII of 1964 Civil Rights Act, as amended
Executive orders
Federal agency guidelines
Supreme Court decisions:
Griggs v. Duke Power Co.,
Albemarle v. Moody
Equal Pay Act of 1963
Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967
State and local laws
Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978
Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974
Ward Cove v. Atonio
Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Civil Rights Act of 1991
Note: The actual laws (and others) can be accessed at:
http://www.usa.gov/Topics/Reference_Shelf.shtml#Laws.
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–14
Sexual Harassment: Court DecisionsSexual Harassment: Court Decisions
Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson
Burlington Industries v. Ellerth
Faragher v. City of Boca Raton
Sexual
Harassment
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–15
FIGURE 2–1 HR in Practice: What Employers Should Do to Minimize Liability in
Sexual Harassment Claims
1. Take all complaints about harassment seriously.
2. Have the victim inform the harasser directly that the conduct is unwelcome and must stop.
3. Conduct a thorough investigation of any complaint of harassment.
4. Issue a strong policy statement condemning harassing behaviors.
5. Inform all employees about the policy prohibiting sexual harassment and of their rights under
the policy.
6. Communicate to employees that sexual harassment will not be tolerated.
7. Establish a management response system that includes an immediate reaction and
investigation by senior management.
8. Provide training to supervisors and managers to increase their awareness of the issues.
9. Discipline managers and employees involved in sexual harassment.
10. Keep thorough records of complaints, investigations, and actions taken.
11. Conduct exit interviews that uncover any complaints.
12. Re-publish the sexual harassment policy periodically.
13. Encourage upward communication to discover evidence of sexual harassment
14. Do not retaliate against an individual for opposing employment practices that discriminate
based on sex or for filing a discrimination charge, testifying, or participating in an investigation,
proceeding, or litigation under Title VII.
Sources: www.eeoc.gov/types/sexual_harrasment.html, accessed May 6, 2007, and © 1991by CCH
Incorporated. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission from Sexual Harassment Manual for
Managers and Supervisors, published in 1991, by CCH Incorporated, a WoltersKluwer Company.
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–16
FIGURE 2–2
California State
University,
Fresno: Complaint
Form for Filing a
Complaint of
Harassment or
Discrimination
Source: California State University, Fresno.
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–17
Adverse ImpactAdverse Impact
Disparate
Rejection
Rates
McDonnell-
Douglas Test
Restricted
Policy
Showing
Adverse Impact
Population
Comparisons
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–18
Showing Disparate TreatmentShowing Disparate Treatment
1
The employer continued seeking applications.
The person applied and was qualified for the job.
McDonnell-Douglas Test for Prima Facie Case
The person belongs to a protected class.
The person was rejected despite qualification.
2
3
4
4
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–19
Bona Fide Occupational QualificationBona Fide Occupational Qualification
Age
Religion
Gender
National Origin
Bona Fide
Occupational
Qualification (BFOQ)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–20
Business NecessityBusiness Necessity
•• “Business Necessity”“Business Necessity”
�� A defense requiring employers to show that there A defense requiring employers to show that there
is an overriding business purpose (i.e., “irresistible is an overriding business purpose (i.e., “irresistible
demand”) for a discriminatory practice. demand”) for a discriminatory practice.
��Spurlock v. United AirlinesSpurlock v. United Airlines
•• ValidityValidity
�� The degree to which the test or other employment The degree to which the test or other employment
practice is related to or predicts performance on the practice is related to or predicts performance on the
job can serve as a business necessity defense.job can serve as a business necessity defense.
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–21
Other Considerations in Discriminatory Other Considerations in Discriminatory
Practice DefensesPractice Defenses
1.1. Good intentions are no excuse.Good intentions are no excuse.
2.2. Employers cannot hide behind collective Employers cannot hide behind collective
bargaining agreementsbargaining agreements——equal opportunity equal opportunity
laws override union contract agreements.laws override union contract agreements.
3.3. Firms should react by agreeing to eliminate an Firms should react by agreeing to eliminate an
illegal practice and (when required) by illegal practice and (when required) by
compensating the people discriminated compensating the people discriminated
against.against.
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–22
Discriminatory Employment PracticesDiscriminatory Employment Practices
Selection
Educational
Requirements
Tests
Preference to Relatives
Height, Weight, and
Physical Characteristics
Arrest Records
Application Forms
Discharge Due to
Garnishment
Recruitment
Word of Mouth
Misleading Information
Help Wanted Ads
Personal Appearance
Dress
Hair
Uniforms
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–23
The EEOC Enforcement ProcessThe EEOC Enforcement Process
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
EEOC Claim and Enforcement Process
Charge Acceptance
File Charge
Serve Notice
Investigation/Fact-Finding
Cause/No Cause
Conciliation
Notice to Sue
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–24
FIGURE 2–4
The EEOC Charge-
Filing Process
Note: Parties may settle at any time.
Source: Based on information at www.eeoc.gov.
Applicant or employee files charge
EEOC advises employer of charge
and if mediation is an option
Successful mediationUnsuccessful mediation
EEOC may ask employer to
submit statement of position
of employer’s side of story
EEOC may ask employer to
respond to request for information
(personnel files, etc.)
EEOC may ask employer to permit
onsite visit by EEOC and to provide
information for witness interview
EEOC completes investigationFinds no reasonable cause Finds reasonable cause
Issues charging party
Dismissal and
Notice of Rights
Charging party may file
lawsuit in Federal Court
within 90 days
Issues Letter of Determination
Offers parties conciliation
Conciliation fails Conciliation successful
EEOC may
litigate in Federal
Court within 180 days of charge
EEOC may decide not to litigate
Sends charging party notice of Right to Sue
Party may sue within 90 days
5
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–25
FIGURE 2–3 Questions to Ask When an Employer Receives Notice That
EEOC Has Filed a Bias Claim
1.1. Exactly what is the charge and is your company covered by the Exactly what is the charge and is your company covered by the
relevant statutes?relevant statutes?
2.2. What protected group does the employee belong to? Is the What protected group does the employee belong to? Is the
EEOC claiming disparate impact or disparate treatment?EEOC claiming disparate impact or disparate treatment?
3.3. Are there any obvious bases upon which you can challenge Are there any obvious bases upon which you can challenge
and/or rebut the claim?and/or rebut the claim?
4.4. If it is a sexual harassment claim, are there offensive comments, If it is a sexual harassment claim, are there offensive comments,
calendars, posters, screensavers, and so on, on display in the calendars, posters, screensavers, and so on, on display in the
company?company?
5.5. Who are the supervisors who actually took the allegedly Who are the supervisors who actually took the allegedly
discriminatory actions and how effective will they be as potential discriminatory actions and how effective will they be as potential
witnesses? witnesses?
Sources: Fair Employment Practices Summary of Latest Developments, January 7, 1983, p. 3, Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033); Kenneth
Sovereign, Personnel Law (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999), pp. 36–37; “EEOC Investigations—What an Employer Should Know,” Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (http://www.eoc.gov/employers/investigations.html), accessed May 6, 2007.
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–26
Mandatory ArbitrationMandatory Arbitration
•• Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.
�� Employers can compel employees to agree Employers can compel employees to agree
to mandatory arbitration of employmentto mandatory arbitration of employment--related related
disputes.disputes.
•• RecommendationsRecommendations
�� Request party be compelled to arbitrate claim.Request party be compelled to arbitrate claim.
�� Insert arbitration clause in employment applications Insert arbitration clause in employment applications
and employee handbooks.and employee handbooks.
�� Protect arbitration process from appeal.Protect arbitration process from appeal.
•• Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–27
Addressing EEOC ClaimsAddressing EEOC Claims
1
2
3
4
5
During the EEOC Investigation:
Meet with the Employee
Follow Three Principles
Limits of EEOC Authority
Submitting Documents
Position Statement
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–28
Addressing EEOC Claims (cont’d)Addressing EEOC Claims (cont’d)
1
2
3
4
During the Fact-
Finding Conference:
Employer’s Attorney
Official Records
Information
Witnesses
1
2
During EEOC Determination
and Attempted Conciliation:
Conciliate Prudently
Review Carefully
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–29
Diversity Management ProgramDiversity Management Program
1
2
3
4
5
Steps in a Diversity Management Program:
Assess the situation
Provide strong leadership
Provide diversity training and education
Change culture and management systems
Evaluate the diversity management program
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–30
Is the Diversity Initiative Effective?Is the Diversity Initiative Effective?
•• Are there women and minorities reporting directly to Are there women and minorities reporting directly to
senior managers?senior managers?
•• Do women and minorities have a fair share of job Do women and minorities have a fair share of job
assignments that are stepping stones to successful assignments that are stepping stones to successful
careers in the company?careers in the company?
•• Do women and minorities have equal access to Do women and minorities have equal access to
international assignments? international assignments?
•• Are female and minority candidates in the company’s Are female and minority candidates in the company’s
career development pipeline?career development pipeline?
•• Are turnover rates for female and minority managers Are turnover rates for female and minority managers
the same or lower than those for white male managers?the same or lower than those for white male managers?
6
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–31
Designing an Affirmative Action ProgramDesigning an Affirmative Action Program
•• Good Faith Effort StrategyGood Faith Effort Strategy
�� Eliminating the present effects of past practices Eliminating the present effects of past practices
that excluded or underutilized protected groups.that excluded or underutilized protected groups.
�� Identification through numerical analysis.Identification through numerical analysis.
��Proactive elimination of employment barriers.Proactive elimination of employment barriers.
�� Increased minority or female applicant flow.Increased minority or female applicant flow.
•• Increasing Employee Support for Increasing Employee Support for
Affirmative ActionAffirmative Action
�� Transparent selection proceduresTransparent selection procedures
�� CommunicationCommunication
�� JustificationsJustifications
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–32
Steps in an Affirmative Action ProgramSteps in an Affirmative Action Program
1.1. Issues a written equal employment policy.Issues a written equal employment policy.
2.2. Appoints a top official to direct and implement the program.Appoints a top official to direct and implement the program.
3.3. Publicizes the equal employment policy and affirmative action Publicizes the equal employment policy and affirmative action
commitment.commitment.
4.4. Surveys minority and female employment to determine where Surveys minority and female employment to determine where
affirmative action programs are especially desirable.affirmative action programs are especially desirable.
5.5. Develops goals and timetables to improve utilization of minorities Develops goals and timetables to improve utilization of minorities
and females.and females.
6.6. Develops and implements specific programs to achieve these Develops and implements specific programs to achieve these
goals.goals.
7.7. Establishes an audit and reporting system to monitor and evaluate Establishes an audit and reporting system to monitor and evaluate
progress of the program.progress of the program.
8.8. Develops support for the affirmative action program, both inside Develops support for the affirmative action program, both inside
the company and in the community.the company and in the community.
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–33
Reverse DiscriminationReverse Discrimination
•• Reverse DiscriminationReverse Discrimination
�� Discrimination against nonDiscrimination against non--minority applicants and minority applicants and
employees by quotaemployees by quota--based systems.based systems.
��Bakke v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaBakke v. Regents of the University of California
��Wygant v. Jackson Board of EducationWygant v. Jackson Board of Education
��U.S. v. ParadiseU.S. v. Paradise
��Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara
CountyCounty
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 2–34
K E Y T E R M SK E Y T E R M S
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights ActTitle VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act
Equal Employment Opportunity Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)Commission (EEOC)
affirmative actionaffirmative action
Office of Federal Contract Compliance Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP)Programs (OFCCP)
Equal Pay Act of 1963Equal Pay Act of 1963
Age Discrimination in Employment ActAge Discrimination in Employment Act
of 1967 (ADEA)of 1967 (ADEA)
Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Act Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Act of 1974of 1974
Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA)Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA)
uniform guidelinesuniform guidelines
sexual harassmentsexual harassment
Federal Violence Against Women Act Federal Violence Against Women Act
of 1994of 1994
protected classprotected class
Civil Rights Act of 1991 (CRA 1991)Civil Rights Act of 1991 (CRA 1991)
mixed motive casemixed motive case
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
qualified individualsqualified individuals
adverse impactadverse impact
disparate rejection ratesdisparate rejection rates
restricted policyrestricted policy
bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ)bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ)
alternative dispute resolution or ADR alternative dispute resolution or ADR programprogram
good faith effort strategygood faith effort strategy
reverse discriminationreverse discrimination