Presentation2
12
0% 60% Chart 1: Performance Levels Over Time Grade 10 State Comprehensive Assessment: ELA Franklin High School, 2007-2010 Failing Needs Improvement Proficient Advanced Percentage of Students
description
- PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of Presentation2
2007 (n=762)
2008
(n=711)
2009 (n=725)
2010
(n=699)
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Chart 1: Performance Levels Over TimeGrade 10 State Comprehensive Assessment: ELA
Franklin High School, 2007-2010
Failing Needs ImprovementProficient Advanced
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s
Franklin
(n=699)
District (n=740)
State (n=70,369)
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Chart 2: Performance Compared to District & StateGrade 10 State Comprehensive Assessment: ELA
2010
Failing Needs ImprovementProficient Advanced
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s
Reading at Grade Level in 9th Grade
(n=608)
Not Reading at Grade Level in 9th Grade
(n=91)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Chart 3: Performance by Reading LevelGrade 10 State Comprehensive Assessment: ELA
Franklin High School, 2010
Failing Needs ImprovementProficient Advanced
Num
ber o
f Stu
dent
s
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Performance Levels by Parent InvolvementGrade 10 State Comprehensive Assessment: ELA
Franklin High School, 2010
Failing Needs ImprovementProficient Advanced
Nu
mb
er
of
Stu
de
nts
Greater than 90% Attendance Less than 90% Attendance0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Performance Levels by AttendanceGrade 10 State Comprehensive Assessment: ELA
Franklin High School, 2010
Failing Needs ImprovementProficient Advanced
Num
ber o
f Stu
dent
s
-10%0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%
Chart 4a: Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient/Advanced by Subgroupsubgroups not mutually exclusive
Grade 10 State Comprehensive Assessment: ELA Franklin High School, 2010
Pe
rce
nta
ge o
f St
ud
en
ts
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Chart 4b: Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient/Advanced by Subgroupsubgroups not mutually exclusive
Grade 10 State Comprehensive Assessment: ELA Franklin High School, 2010
Pe
rce
nta
ge o
f St
ud
en
ts
Less than 90% attendance
More than two discipline referrals
Parent attended Parent Night
Parent did not attend Parent Night
Fewer than two discipline referrals
Greater than 90% attendance
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Percentage of Subgroup scoring Proficient or Advanced
Percentage of Subgroup scoring Proficient or Advanced
Vocabulary and Concept De-velopment
5
Structure and Origins of Modern English
1
Understanding a Text1
Genre1
Theme1Fiction
8Nonfiction
13
Poetry3
Style and Language4
Dramatic Literature3
Chart 5:Number of Test Items
per StandardState Comprehensive Assessment: ELA
2010
Language Strand6
Reading and Literature
Strand34
Number of Test Items per Strand
Total Items= 40State Comprehensive Assessment: ELA
2010
Fiction
(8 items)
Dramatic Lit-erature (3 items)
Understanding a Text (1 item)
Style and Lan-guage
(4 items)
Nonfiction (13 items)
Theme
(1 item)
Structures and Origins of
Modern Eng-lish (1 item)
Vocabulary and Concept
Development
(5 items)
Genre
(1 item)
Poetry
(3 items)
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Chart 6: Average Percentage of Correct Answers for Each Standard Tested
Grade 10 State Comprehensive Assessment: ELAFranklin High School, 2010 (n=400)
Franklin State
ELA State Standard Tested
Ave
rage
Per
cent
age
of C
orre
ct A
nsw
ers
12
Fiction
(8 items)
Dramatic Liter-ature (3
items)
Understanding a Text
(1 item)
Style and Lan-guage
(4 items)
Nonfiction
(13 items)
Theme
(1 item)
Structures and Origins of
Modern Eng-lish
(1 item)
Vocabulary and Concept
Development (5 items)
Genre
(1 item)
Poetry
(3 items)
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Chart 6: Average Percentage of Correct Answers for Each Standard Tested
Grade 10 State Comprehensive Assessment: ELAFranklin High School, 2010 (n=400)
ELA State Standard Tested
Ave
rage
Per
cent
age
of C
orre
ct A
nsw
ers
