Provincial Examination Results - New Brunswick · 2018. 9. 1. · Chapter 1 ‐ Provincial...

PPrroovviinncciiaall EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss FFrraannccoopphhoonnee SScchhooooll DDiissttrriiccttss

Department of Education and Early Childhood Development Francophone Assessment and Evaluation Branch

DDeecceemmbbeerr 22001111

To obtain additional copies of this report, or to forward your comments, please use the following address:

Francophone Assessment and Evaluation Branch Department of Education and Early Childhood Development

of New Brunswick P.O. Box 6000 Fredericton, NB

E3B 5H1

Tel.: 506-453-2157 Fax: 506-462-2201

E-mail: [email protected]

Internet : http://www.gnb.ca/0000/francophone-f.asp#1

December 2011 _____________________________________________________________

Une version française de ce document est également disponible.

Contact/Téléphonez aux Communications 506-444-4714

Fax/Télécopie: 506-457-4810

E-ail: [email protected] Internet : http://www.gnb.ca/0000/francophone-f.asp#1

PPrroovviinncciiaall EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss

FFrraannccoopphhoonnee SScchhooooll DDiissttrriiccttss DDeecceemmbbeerr 22001111

ISBN : 978-1-55471-944-0

Francophone School Districts

IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn

i

IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn

he Department of Education and Early Childhood Development is pleased to present this provincial

statistical report to give school staff, parents, and the public a general idea of how students in New Brunswick’s Francophone school districts did on the provincial examinations administered in the 2010-2011 school year. A similar document is produced for the Anglophone school districts. However, results from the Anglophone and francophone school districts are not comparable because the school programs are different. This document has four chapters. The first is an overview of the learning evaluation program. The second chapter provides details on the learning evaluation program at the elementary level. It contains the results of the examinations in Grade 2 and Grade 4 Literacy, Grades 5 and 8 Sciences et technologies, Grades 3, 5, and 8 Mathématiques, and Grades 5 and 8 Français.

The third chapter provides details on the learning evaluation program at the high school level. It contains the results of the examinations in Grade 11 Mathématiques and Grade 11 Français, as well as the Grade 10 ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment. The fourth chapter contains a brief description of pan-Canadian and international assessments in addition to results showing how New Brunswick matches up against the other Canadian provinces and the OECD member countries on these assessments. Any comments likely to make this report more informative and complete should be sent to the following address: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development Francophone Assessment and Evaluation Branch P.O. Box 6000 Fredericton, N.B. E3B 5H1

T

Table of Contents

iii

TTaabbllee ooff CCoonntteennttss IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn......................................................................................................................... i

CChhaapptteerr 11 PPrroovviinncciiaall EEvvaalluuaattiioonn PPrrooggrraamm aatt tthhee EElleemmeennttaarryy aanndd HHiigghh SScchhooooll LLeevveellss

Why is there a provincial evaluation program in New Brunswick schools?............. 1 What subjects were tested? ................................................................................... 1

How are the exams prepared? ............................................................................... 1

How are the exams administered? ......................................................................... 2

How is exam marking coordinated? ....................................................................... 2

How are the exams marked? ................................................................................. 2

Are there any precautions to bear in mind when interpreting the results? .............. 2

How are the exams followed up? ........................................................................... 3

CChhaapptteerr 22 PPrroovviinncciiaall EElleemmeennttaarryy SScchhooooll EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss

Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary School Level...................... 5

What is the purpose of these exams? ........................................................ 5

What is tested? .......................................................................................... 5 Charts

1 to 6 Grade 2 provincial Literacy exam, percentage of students having achieved level 3 or 4 ................................................................................... 6

7 to 12 Percentage of students having passed the provincial Grade 3 Mathématiques exam ................................................................. 12

13 to 18 Provincial Grade 4 Literacy exam, percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher, by school, including the district and province ............................................................................ 18

19 to 24 Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Sciences et technologies exam, by school, including the districts and province .......................................... 24

25 to 30 Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Mathématiques exam, by school, including the districts and province ........................................................... 30

Table of Contents

iv

31 to 36 Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Français exam, by school, including the districts and province ........................................................... 36

37 to 42 Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 8 Sciences et technologies exam, by school, including the districts and province .......................................... 42

43 to 48 Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 8 Mathématiques exam, by school, including the districts and province ........................................................... 48

49 to 54 Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 8 Français exam, by school, including the districts and province ........................................................... 54

55 to 64 Résultats des examens au primaire selon le sexe, les districts et la province ................................................................................................ 60

CChhaapptteerr 33 PPrroovviinncciiaall HHiigghh SScchhooooll EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss

Provincial Evaluation Program at the High School Level ............................... 67

What is the purpose of these exams? ...................................................... 67

What is the passing grade? ...................................................................... 67 Charts

65 Provincial exam enrolment rates by course and sex ................................. 68

66 à 69 Do the provincial exam results differ according to sex? ............................ 69

70 à 81 Differencee between provincial exam average and school mark average ................................................................................ 71

Is there an appreciable difference between the exam marks and the school marks? ..................................................................................... 72

82 à 85 Performance indices for Français and Mathématiques by school, including the districts and province ........................................................... 79

What is the performance index? ............................................................... 80

86 Percentage of students having achieved intermediate level or higher on the Grade 10 ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment, by school, including the districts and province ........................................................... 84

Second language oral proficiency scale ................................................... 84

87 à 130 Percentage of students having achieved a provincial exam result of 55% or more (acceptable level) or 70% (competent level) by subject and school, including the district and province, since 2007 .......... 87

Tables by subject, level, and school at the high school level .................. 110 Grade 11 Français (regular level) ....................................................... 111

Table of Contents

v

Grade 11Français (modified level) ..................................................... 112

Grade 11 Mathématiques (regular level) ............................................ 113

Grade 11 Mathématiques (modified level) .......................................... 114

ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment Grade 10 (all levels) .................... 115

CChhaapptteerr 44 RReessuullttss ooff PPaann--CCaannaaddiiaann aanndd IInntteerrnnaattiioonnaall AAsssseessssmmeennttss

Pan-Canadian (PCAP/SAIP) and International (PISA)

Assessment Programs ................................................................................... 117

What are SAIP and PCAP? .................................................................... 117

Why did CMEC develop SAIP and PCAP? ............................................. 117

Why did CMEC replace SAIP with PCAP? ............................................. 118

What is PISA?......................................................................................... 118

Who participates in PISA? ...................................................................... 118

How are students selected? (PISA) ........................................................ 119

How is the information used? (PISA) ...................................................... 119 Graphique

131-136 Average scores and confidence intervals, by province and country,

for each PCAP 2010 domain .................................................................. 120

137-149 Average scores and confidence interval, by province and country, For each PISA domain (2000 to 2009) ................................................... 129

CCoonncclluussiioonn ....................................................................................................................... 149

Chapter 1 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results

Chapter 1

Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary and High School Levels

Why is there a provincial evaluation program in New Brunswick schools?

For a number of years now, New Brunswickhas been looking more closely at theeducation system and its performance. Areschools preparing students to becomecommitted, productive, and responsiblecitizens? Will students be ready to meet thechallenges of the 21st century? These are

What subjects were tested?

All the results presented in this document arefrom the 14 provincial examinationsadministered from kindergarten to Grade 12 inthe 2010-2011 school year. The subjectstested were as follows:

- Grades 2 and 4 Literacy;- Grades 3, 5, and 8 Mathématiques;

1

Chapter 1

Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary and High School Levels

Why is there a provincial evaluation program in New Brunswick schools?

For a number of years now, New Brunswickhas been looking more closely at theeducation system and its performance. Areschools preparing students to becomecommitted, productive, and responsiblecitizens? Will students be ready to meet thechallenges of the 21st century? These arequestions being asked by parents, othereducation stakeholders, and New Brunswicktaxpayers as a whole.

To answer these questions, a provincialevaluation program was set up to assessstudents’ skills in literacy, mathematics, andscience and technology at key stages in theeducation system.

The provincial evaluations are also used toassess studies for the purpose of awardingthe high school diploma.

What subjects were tested?

All the results presented in this document arefrom the 14 provincial examinationsadministered from kindergarten to Grade 12 inthe 2010-2011 school year. The subjectstested were as follows:

- Grades 2 and 4 Literacy;- Grades 3, 5, and 8 Mathématiques;- Grades 5 and 8 Français;- Grades 5 and 8 Sciences &

technologies;- Grade10 ESL;- Grade 11 Mathématiques (regularand modified; and

- Grade 11 Français (regular and modified).

How are the exams prepared?

The provincial examinations are developedtogether with teaching staff. Supervision isprovided by provincial evaluation consultantsin association with the provincial and districtcurriculum officers concerned. The theoreticalfoundations and nature of the exams aredefined in the assessment framework for eachsubject.

Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 1

How are the exams administered?

The rules and procedures to be followed inorder to ensure uniform administration of theexams are set out in an administration guide,which is updated and distributed to theschools for each exam session. TheFrancophone Assessment and EvaluationBranch is responsible for coordinating andadministering the exams .

How is exam marking coordinated?

For each subject tested, head markers aretrained beforehand to oversee the use of themarking grids and ensure uniform scoringprovince-wide. Marking is coordinated byprovincial evaluation consultants incooperation with provincial curriculum officers.

Are there any precautions to bear in mind when interpreting the results?

When comparing averages for a given subject,we must take into account the measurementerror associated with each score before wecan claim there is a difference between twoaverages. Using the standard error, a range(confidence interval) is established, withinwhich the true value of the average is locatedin 95% of cases. The 95% confidence intervalused in this report is calculated by adding twostandard errors on each side of the average.The difference between the averages of twoschools is said to be significant if theirconfidence intervals do not overlap.

In reviewing the provincial examination resultsat the high school level, it should be noted thatstudents enrolled in regular-level courses writeone set of exams, while those enrolled in

2

How are the exams marked?

Once the exams have been administered, thehigh school students’ booklets are sent tothree marking centres located in Shediac,Edmundston, and Bathurst. The elementaryschool students’ booklets are sent to a singlemarking centre at either the Moncton orEdmundston campus of the Université deMoncton. The constructed-response questionsare marked by teaching staff under thecoordination of the head markers (teachers ordistrict supervisors), who are trained by theprovincial evaluation consultants. Theselected-response questions are markedelectronically .

gone set of exams, while those enrolled inmodified-level courses write another.Interestingly, in schools having a largepercentage of students enrolled at the regularlevel, the results are often better than, or atleast comparable with, those of other schoolsfor both the regular- and modified-levelexams. This makes it very important toconsider the percentage of students enrolledat each level.

We must bear in mind as well that provincialexam marks and school marks are only two ofmany factors indicating a school’s overallsituation. Socioeconomic conditions,demographics, what is expected of students,and parental involvement also influencestudent performance. This report does nottake the latter factors into account.


How are the exams followed up?

At the high school level, a statistical reportbreaking down the results by skill and contentis published after each exam session. Itcontains a description of the school resultsand the provincial average for each subject.This statistical report is available in PDFformat at the following Web address :

http://www.gnb.ca/education/francophone-f.asp#1

The school districts, together with the schooladministrators and teaching staff, areresponsible for interpreting the results anddeveloping an education plan. The statisticsare reviewed at the provincial level to aid indecision making regarding curricula.

3


4


Chapter 2

Provincial Elementary School Examination Results

Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary School Level

What is the purpose of these exams?

The provincial evaluation program at theelementary school level has a very specificobjective: to use the information obtained fromthe exams to determine whether or not

What is tested?

The exams are developed on the basis of alist of topics drawn up by school districtpersonnel and Department consultants. Thetopics are derived from the provincial curriculaand identify the elements essential for further

5

Chapter 2

Provincial Elementary School Examination Results

Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary School Level


The provincial evaluation program at theelementary school level has a very specificobjective: to use the information obtained fromthe exams to determine whether or notstudents have mastered the skills and abilitiesassociated with the curricula being evaluated.

Using the results, teaching staff and schooladministrators can develop and applyappropriate action strategies for correctingweaknesses noted among students, and canguide students in a review of what they havelearned.

The results are also analyzed by the schoolsand school districts and the Department ofEducation.

What is tested?

The exams are developed on the basis of alist of topics drawn up by school districtpersonnel and Department consultants. Thetopics are derived from the provincial curriculaand identify the elements essential for furtherdevelopment of skills in Grades 5 and 8Sciences et technologies, in Grades 3, 5, and8 Mathématiques, and in Grades 5 and 8Français.

At the end of Grade 2, reading comprehensionis evaluated at the provincial level. This examconsists of a reading comprehension test andan oral reading test. Reading comprehensionis also evaluated at the beginning of Grade 4.


Grade 2 provincial literacy exam, percentage of students having achieved level 3 or 4

Description of performance levels for the Grade 2 literacy exam

Level 1 – The student has significant difficulty in reading.

Level 2 – The student will be able to:read and understand straightforward, illustrated texts geared to his/her level; read variousfamiliar words, e.g., cat, dog, happy, give; break down words into their constituent sounds,e.g., teach-er, pa-per; read various words made up of complex sounds, e.g., neighbour,bread; explain how he/she tackles new words when reading; read while making mistakesthat do not change the meaning of a text; retell what he/she has read and give additionaldetails when asked questions; identify the main characters and events.

Level 3* – The student will be able to:d d d t d ill t t d t t d t hi /h l l d f f ili d

6

Level 3 – The student will be able to:read and understand illustrated texts geared to his/her level; read a range of familiar words,e.g., eyes, red, morning, reading; read words made up of complex sounds, e.g., friend, said,would; explain how he/she tackles new words when reading; find the meaning of a wordbased on the context; read fluently and observe punctuation marks; retell what he/she hasread and describe most of the events of the story; describe the characters, the centralproblem, and how the problem is solved; find answers to questions using clues contained inthe text.

Level 4 – The student will be able to:read and understand texts geared to his/her level, with or without picture support; explain the varioustechniques he/she uses to read words; find the meaning of a word based on the context; readfluently and observe punctuation marks so as to read expressively; retell what he/she has read anddescribe the main events of the story; describe the characters, the central problem, and how theproblem is solved; find answers to questions using clues given in the text or by drawing on personalexperiences or even by making generalizations extending beyond the content of the text.

* By the end of Grade 2, students are expected to have attained Level 3.


Chart 1

District 01 n= 696

District 03 n= 436

District 05 n= 350

District 09 n= 382

District 11 n= 375

Province n= 2239

Chart 2

Number of students who

wrote the exam

District 01

Grade 2

Literacy

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy assessment at Grade 2 by District, Including the Province

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 2

7773

6976 75 7476 76 75

83

74 77

0

20

40

60

80

100

District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province

Percentages

Reading Comprehension Oral Reading

target

Des Bâtisseurs n= 85

Arc‐en‐ciel n= 33

Saint‐Henri n= 99

Sainte‐Bernadette n= 42

Amirault n= 169

Abbey‐Landry n= 33

Sainte‐Thérèse n= 75

Champlain n= 85

District 01 n= 696

Province n= 2239

n= 76Samuel‐de‐

Champlain

7


wrote the exam

74

77

72

76

91

83

54

69

70

84

80

77

76

72

81

82

88

57

56

76

81

79

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Champlain

Sainte‐Thérèse

Abbey‐Landry

Amirault

Sainte‐Bernadette

Saint‐Henri

Arc‐en‐ciel

Des Bâtisseurs

Samuel‐de‐Champlain

Percentages

Oral Reading Reading Comprehension

target


Chart 3

Ernest‐Lang n= 11

Sainte‐Anne n= 15

Saint‐Joseph n= 11

Carrefour de la

Jeunessen= 52

Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerollen= 10

Centre d'appren‐

tissage du Haut‐

Madawaska

n= 21

Grade 2

Literacy


wrote the exam

District 03 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 2

Régionale

Saint‐Basilen= 31

73

80

79

55

77

60

80

73

71

69

62

83

67

76

64

84

80

67

73

62

75

G d Ri iè

Élémentaire Sacré‐Coeur

Notre‐Dame

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph

Régionale Saint‐Basile

Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle

Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang

Centre d'apprentissage du Haut‐Madawaska

Carrefour de la Jeunesse

Saint‐Jacques n= 33

Notre‐Dame n= 61

Grande‐Rivière n= 26

Mgr‐Lang n= 24

Marie‐Immaculée n= 18

Echo Jeunesse n= 24

Mgr‐Martin n= 40

District 03 n= 436

Province n= 2239

n= 41

n= 18

Élémentaire

Sacré‐Coeur

Régional de

Saint‐André

8

74

73

85

75

72

50

72

65

77

76

90

83

61

83

89

62

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Mgr‐Martin

Echo Jeunesse

Marie‐Immaculée

Mgr‐Lang

Régional de Saint‐André

Grande‐Rivière

Percentages


target


Chart 4

Cité‐de‐l'Amitié n= 65

n= 19

Le Tournesol n= 53

Séjour‐Jeunesse* n= 3

District 05

n= 18

Académie

Assomptionn= 16

La Croisée


Carrefour‐

Étudiantn= 39

François‐Xavier‐

Daigle

Grade 2

Literacy


wrote the exam

La Découverte‐de‐

Saint‐Sauveur*n= 3

67

80

75

68

53

67

79

69

67

77

75

81

50

56

85

75

Mgr‐Melanson

Apollo‐XI

Académie Assomption

Séjour‐Jeunesse*

Le Tournesol

La Croisée

François‐Xavier‐Daigle

École Carrefour‐Étudiant

La Découverte‐de‐Saint‐Sauveur*

Cité‐de‐l'Amitié

Apollo‐XI n= 44

Mgr‐Melanson n= 15

Versant‐Nord n= 17

Le Coin‐des‐Amis n= 6

Arthur‐Pinet* n= 4

District 05 n= 350

Province n= 2239

Académie

Notre‐Damen= 28

n= 20Domaine‐des‐

Copains

9

74

69

50

100

61

59

67

77

75

70

100

82

82

67

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05

Domaine‐des‐Copains

Arthur‐Pinet*

Le Coin‐des‐Amis

Académie Notre‐Dame

Versant‐Nord

Mgr‐Melanson

Percentages


target

* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.


Chart 5

La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 10

Centre la fontaine n= 25

René‐Chouinard n= 24

L'Amitié n= 20

La Source n= 28

La Ruche n= 55

La Passerelle n= 31

L'Envolée n= 29

L'Étincelle n= 16

La‐Rivière n= 15

Grade 2

Literacy

District 09


wrote the exam

La Relève‐de‐

Saint‐Isidoren= 16


73

88

83

81

55

87

79

75

54

80

80

87

94

86

94

68

82

89

80

58

88

90

La‐Rivière

L'Étincelle

L'Envolée

La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore

La Passerelle

La Ruche

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine

La Villa‐des‐Amis

Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 25

Le Maillon n= 16

Ola‐léger n= 9

District 09 n= 382

Province n= 2239

Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandren= 16

Marguerite‐

Bourgeoysn= 38

L'Escale‐des‐

Jeunesn= 9

10

74

76

78

78

81

82

60

81

73

77

83

78

67

94

97

72

94

87

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09

Ola‐léger

L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes

Le Maillon

Marguerite‐Bourgeoys

Terre‐des‐Jeunes

Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre

La‐Rivière

Percentages


target


Chart 6

Le Soleil‐Levant n= 31

W‐F‐Boisvert n= 26

Grande‐Digue n= 18

Donat‐Robichaud n= 25


La Marée‐

Montanten= 24

Régionale‐de‐

Baie‐Sainte‐Annen= 22

Père‐Edgar‐

T.‐LeBlancn= 32

Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 21

Grade 2

Literacy

District 11


wrote the exam

87

78

63

76

89

95

88

52

50

95

80

76

66

84

67

82

81

55

71

95

Mont‐Carmel

Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois

Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc

Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue

Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne

W‐F‐Boisvert

Le Soleil‐Levant

La Marée‐Montante

Carrefour‐Beausoleil

Mont‐Carmel n= 15

Camille‐Vautour n= 27

Saint‐Paul n= 7

Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 7

Notre‐Dame n= 12

District 11 n= 375

Province n= 2239

Blanche‐

Bourgeoisn= 20

Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaudn= 37

11

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeoisn= 51

74

75

76

75

67

71

71

74

87

77

74

78

65

75

57

71

78

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11

Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud

Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame

Calixte‐F.‐Savoie

Saint‐Paul

Camille‐Vautour

Mont Carmel

Percentages


target


Percentage of students having passed the provincial Grade 3 Mathématiques exam

12


Chart 7

District 01 n= 652

District 03 n= 407

District 05 n= 338

District 09 n= 412

District 11 n= 365

Province n= 2174

Chart 8

Grade 3

Mathématiques

Percentage of Students Having Passed the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam by District, Including the Province


wrote the exam

District 01

Percentage of Students Having Passed the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam

7782

65

74

64

73

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

target



Anna Malenfant n= 109

Saint‐Henri n= 69


Amirault n= 57



Champlain n= 97

District 01 n= 652

Province n= 2174

13


wrote the exam

Samuel‐de‐

Champlainn= 55

73

77

75

69

74

75

71

75

85

65

83

78

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Champlain

Sainte‐Thérèse

Abbey‐Landry

Amirault

Sainte‐Bernadette

Saint‐Henri

Anna Malenfant

Arc‐en‐ciel

Des Bâtisseurs


Percentages

target


Chart 9

Ernest‐Lang* n= 5

Sainte‐Anne n= 14


District 03 Percentage of Students Having Passed the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam

Grade 3

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

Carrefour de la

Jeunessen= 37

Centre d'appren‐

tissage du Haut‐

Madawaska

n= 19

Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerollen= 11

Régionale

Saint‐Basilen= 29

77

93

78

92

69

55

64

84

92


Notre‐Dame

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph



Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang*




Notre‐Dame n= 40


Mgr‐Lang n= 18


Echo Jeunesse n= 30

Mgr‐Martin n= 37

District 03 n= 407

Province n= 2174

Élémentaire

Sacré‐Coeurn= 39

Régional de

Saint‐Andrén= 20

14

73

82

92

87

100

94

85

57

77

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Mgr‐Martin

Echo Jeunesse

Marie‐Immaculée

Mgr‐Lang


Grande‐Rivière


Percentages

target



Chart 10

n= 61

n= 40

n= 46

n= 4


wrote the exam



Grade 3

Mathématiques


École Carrefour‐

Étudiantn= 30


Daiglen= 15

Académie

Assomptionn= 14

La Croisée


Le Tournesol

Séjour‐Jeunesse *

63

78

93

59

48

60

50

67

Mgr Melanson

Apollo‐XI


Séjour‐Jeunesse *

Le Tournesol

La Croisée





n= 41

n= 16

n= 17

n= 6

n= 10

District 05 n= 338

Province n= 2174


Apollo‐XI

Domaine‐des‐

Copainsn= 16

15

Mgr‐Melanson

Versant‐Nord

Arthur‐Pinet

Académie Notre‐

Damen= 19

* Les résultats des écoles ayant cinq inscriptions ou moins ne sont pas publiés maissont comptabilisés dans les résultats du district et de la province.

73

65

50

50

50

79

94

63

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05


Arthur‐Pinet



Versant‐Nord

Mgr‐Melanson

Percentages

target



Chart 11




L'Amitié n= 16

La Source n= 35

La Ruche n= 57

La Passerelle n= 27

L'Envolée n= 46

L'Étincelle n= 15

La‐Rivière n= 14

La Relève‐de‐

Saint‐Isidore

Grade 3

Mathématiques



wrote the exam

n= 22

100

87

65

68

74

70

66

69

91

65

27

La‐Rivière

L'Étincelle

L'Envolée


La Passerelle

La Ruche

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine



Le Maillon n= 13

Ola‐léger n= 17

District 09 n= 412

Province n= 2174

n= 9

n= 33

Marguerite‐

Bourgeoysn= 40

L'Escale‐des‐

Jeunes

16

Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandre

73

74

65

89

92

88

74

88

100

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09

Ola‐léger


Le Maillon




La‐Rivière

Percentages

target


Chart 12





Grade 3

Mathématiques

District 11


wrote the exam

Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 19

La Marée‐

Montanten= 30

Régionale‐de‐

Baie‐Sainte‐Annen= 22

Père‐Edgar‐

T.‐LeBlancn= 31

Percentage of Students Having Passed the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam

93

66

65

50

75

77

33

58

60

74

Mont‐Carmel



Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue


W‐F‐Boisvert

Le Soleil‐Levant



Mont‐Carmel n= 14


Saint‐Paul n= 6


Notre‐Dame n= 11

District 11 n= 365

Province n= 2174

17

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeoisn= 50

Blanche‐

Bourgeoisn= 14

Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaudn= 30

73

64

57

64

73

75

67

55

93

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame


Saint‐Paul

Camille‐Vautour

Mont‐Carmel

Percentages

target


Provincial Grade 4 Literacy exam,percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher, by school, including the districts and province

Description of performance levels for the Grade 4 literacy exam

Level 1 – The student has significant difficulty in reading.

Level 2 – The student will be able to:find the meaning of certain words or expressions from the context; retrieve certain explicitinformation and combine information according to a proposed structure; identify the subjectof the text and most of the important information; make certain predictions when theinformation is explicit; provide meaning for certain substitution words; identify the structuralelements of the text; reconstruct the chronological order of certain events of the story; makeconnections between the different parts of the text and relate some ideas to personalexperiences; make inferences clearly suggested by the text but will sometimes have troublejustifying them; respond to the text with personal experiences.

Level 3* – The student will be able to:find the meaning of most of the words and expressions from the context; retrieve most of theexplicit information select various relevant pieces of information and combine them

18

find the meaning of most of the words and expressions from the context; retrieve most of theexplicit information, select various relevant pieces of information and combine themaccording to a proposed structure; identify the important information and the main idea;make accurate predictions when the information is explicit and certain predictions when theinformation is implicit; provide meaning for various substitution words and some linkingwords; use indices to guide understanding and interpret certain elements of pictorialrepresentation; reconstruct the chronological order and most of the events of the story;make connections between the different parts of the text and relate most of the ideas topersonal experiences; make inferences and justify them most of the time; respond to thetext based on the content and personal experiences

Level 4 – The student will be able to:find the meaning of the words and expressions from the context; retrieve explicitinformation, select the relevant information and put it together according to a proposedstructure; identify certain secondary ideas; make accurate predictions when the informationis implicit and adjust them as needed; provide meaning for substitution words and manylinking words; interpret pictorial representations; reconstruct the chronological order of theevents of the story; make connections between the different parts of the text and relate theideas to situations in everyday life and other texts; make inferences and justify them with thetext while formulating opinions.

* At the beginning of Grade 4, students are expected to have attained Level 3.


Chart 13

District 01 n= 589

District 03 n= 430

District 05 n= 343

District 09 n= 398

District 11 n= 377

Province n= 2137

Chart 14Percentage of students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the

Literacy Assessment at Grade 4

Grade 4

Literacy

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 4 by District, Including the Province


wrote the exam

District 01

60 58

71 69

44

60

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

target



Anna Malenfant n= 104

Saint‐Henri n= 73


Amirault n= 37



Champlain n= 95

District 01 n= 589

Province n= 2137

19

Samuel‐de‐

Champlainn= 49


wrote the exam

60

60

46

51

57

57

80

58

76

55

63

63

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Champlain

Sainte‐Thérèse

Abbey‐Landry

Amirault

Sainte‐Bernadette

Saint‐Henri

Anna Malenfant

Arc‐en‐ciel

Des Bâtisseurs


Percentages

target


Chart 15

Ernest‐Lang n= 7

Sainte‐Anne n= 11



wrote the exam

Carrefour de la

Jeunessen= 41

District 03 Percentage of students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 4

Centre

d'apprentissage du

Haut‐Madawaska

n= 31

Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerollen= 12

Régionale Saint‐

Basilen= 23

Grade 4

Literacy

54

72

50

59

74

50

36

71

52

61


Notre‐Dame

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph



Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang




Notre‐Dame n= 53


Mgr‐Lang n= 24


Echo Jeunesse n= 29

Mgr‐Martin n= 38

District 03 n= 430

Province n= 2137

20

Élémentaire Sacré‐

Coeurn= 35

Régional de Saint‐

Andrén= 18

60

58

71

62

60

46

39

47

54

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Mgr‐Martin

Echo Jeunesse

Marie‐Immaculée

Mgr‐Lang


Grande‐Rivière


Percentages

target


Chart 16

Cité‐de‐l'Amitié n= 60

n= 28

Séjour‐Jeunesse* n= 3



wrote the exam



Le Domaine‐

Étudiantn= 50

École Carrefour‐

Étudiantn= 37


Daiglen= 17

La Croisée

Académie n= 18

Grade 4

Literacy

District 05

87

66

44

61

71

78

70

77

Mgr Melanson

Apollo‐XI


Séjour‐Jeunesse*

La Croisée



Le Domaine‐Étudiant



n= 35



n= 10

Arthur‐Pinet n= 6

District 05 n= 343

Province n= 2137

21

Domaine‐des‐

Copainsn= 19

Apollo‐XI

Académie Notre‐

Damen= 23


Assomptionn= 18

60

71

79

33

70

70

76

87

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05


Arthur‐Pinet



Versant‐Nord

Mgr‐Melanson

Percentages

target



Chart 17




L'Amitié n= 23

La Source n= 35

La Ruche n= 52

La Passerelle n= 24

L'Envolée n= 47

L'Étincelle n= 15

La‐Rivière n= 11

Grade 4

Literacy



wrote the exam

La Relève‐de‐Saint‐

Isidoren= 19

64

87

66

68

71

71

86

48

63

35

50

La‐Rivière

L'Étincelle

L'Envolée


La Passerelle

La Ruche

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine



Le Maillon n= 13

Ola‐léger n= 13

District 09 n= 398

Province n= 2137

Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandren= 31

Marguerite‐

Bourgeoysn= 40

L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes n= 16

22

60

69

62

75

77

95

70

48

64

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09

Ola‐léger


Le Maillon




La‐Rivière

Percentages

target


Chart 18





Grade 4

Literacy



wrote the exam

Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 19

La Marée‐

Montanten= 46

Régionale‐de‐Baie‐

Sainte‐Annen= 16

Père‐Edgar‐T.‐

LeBlancn= 28

50

51

39

55

67

38

18

31

37

74

Mont‐Carmel



Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue


W‐F‐Boisvert

Le Soleil‐Levant



Mont‐Carmel n= 8


Saint‐Paul n= 6


Notre‐Dame n= 11

District 11 n= 377

Province n= 2137

23

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeoisn= 59

Blanche‐Bourgeois n= 20

Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaudn= 21

60

44

24

45

64

57

0

36

50

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame


Saint‐Paul

Camille‐Vautour

Mont‐Carmel

Percentages

target


Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Sciences et technologies exam, by school, including the districts and province

24


Chart 19

District 01 n= 587

District 03 n= 414

District 05 n= 374

District 09 n= 461

District 11 n= 369

Province n= 2205

Chart 20

Grade 5

Sciences et

technologies


wrote the exam

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et technologies Exam by School,

Including the Districts and Province

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et technologies Exam

District 01

83 8076 74 74

78

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

target

63Samuel‐de‐Champlain



Anna‐Malenfant n= 183

Saint‐Henri n= 77



Champlain n= 77

District 01 n= 587

Province n= 2205

n= 71


wrote the exam

25

Samuel‐de‐

Champlain

78

83

77

82

100

84

91

84

83

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Champlain

Abbey‐Landry

Sainte‐Bernadette

Saint‐Henri

Anna Malenfant

Arc‐en‐ciel

Des Bâtisseurs

Champlain

Percentages

target


Chart 21

Ernest‐Lang n= 11

Sainte‐Anne n= 18

Centre d'apprentis‐

sage du Haut‐

Madawaska

n= 23


wrote the exam

District 03

Carrefour de la

Jeunessen= 43

Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerolle*n= 5

Régionale n= 29


Grade 5

Sciences et

technologies

72

75

95

83

83

100

74

79

Notre‐Dame

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph


Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle*

Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang





Notre‐Dame n= 46


Mgr‐Lang n= 30


Echo Jeunesse n= 21

Mgr‐Martin n= 34

District 03 n= 80

Province n= 78

Régional de

Saint‐Andrén= 15

Saint‐Basilen= 29

Élémentaire

Sacré‐Coeurn= 29

26

78

80

97

86

84

67

53

83

83

72

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Mgr‐Martin

Echo Jeunesse

Marie‐Immaculée

Mgr‐Lang


Grande‐Rivière


Notre‐Dame

Percentages

target



Chart 22



Saint‐Sauveur

n= 55

n= 40

n= 21

District 05


wrote the exam

Grade 5

Sciences et

technologies

Le Domaine‐

Étudiant

n= 9

École Carrefour‐

Étudiant

n= 59


Daigle


64

71

43

78

71

78

82

A ll XI


Séjour‐Jeunesse*

La Croisée




La Découverte‐de‐Saint‐Sauveur


n= 35

n= 5

n= 34


n= 21

Le Coin‐des‐Amis n= 10

n= 13

N= 374

Province N= 2205

District 05

Académie

Assomptionn= 14

Séjour‐Jeunesse*

La Croisée

Arthur‐Pinet

Académie Notre‐

Dame

Apollo‐XI

Versant‐Nord

Domaine‐des‐

Copainsn= 14

n= 23

27

78

76

71

54

100

91

76

71

94

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05


Arthur‐Pinet



Versant‐Nord

Mgr‐Melanson

Apollo‐XI

Percentages

target



Chart 23




L'Amitié n= 25

La Source n= 41

La Ruche n= 74

La Passerelle n= 23

L'Envolée n= 51

É


wrote the exam

District 09


Isidoren= 17


Grade 5

Sciences et

technologies

73

65

91

78

71

52

79

81

50

É

L'Envolée


La Passerelle

La Ruche

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine


L'Étincelle n= 11

La‐Rivière n= 11


Ola‐léger n= 13

Léandre‐LeGresley n= 12

District 09 n= 461

Province n= 2205

Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandren= 35

Marguerite‐

Bourgeoysn= 42


28

78

74

83

92

81

69

88

74

73

36

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09

Léandre‐LeGresley

Ola‐léger





La‐Rivière

L'Étincelle

Percentages

target


Chart 24





Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 21

District 11


wrote the exam


Sainte‐Annen= 16

La Marée‐

Montanten= 33

Grade 5

Sciences et

technologies


84

67

71

72

63

74

82

76

86



Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue


W‐F‐Boisvert

Le Soleil‐Levant



Mont‐Carmel n= 12

n= 17

Saint‐Paul* n= 4


Notre‐Dame n= 12

District n= 369

Province n= 2205

Camille‐Vautour


LeBlancn= 43

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeois


Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaudn= 41

n= 32

29

78

74

68

69

100

88

53

75

84

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame


Saint‐Paul*

Camille‐Vautour

Mont‐Carmel


Percentages

target



Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Mathématiques examby school, including the districts and province

30


Chart 25

District 01 n= 592

District 03 n= 414

District 05 n= 378

District 09 n= 469

District 11 n= 367

Province n= 2220

Chart 26

Grade 5

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

District 01 Percentage of Students Aaving Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam by District, Including

the Province

81 8275 72

75 77

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

target





Saint‐Henri n= 78



Champlain n= 79

District 01 n= 592

Province n= 2220


wrote the exam

Samuel‐de‐

Champlainn= 70

31

77

81

82

87

83

77

86

45

86

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Champlain

Abbey‐Landry

Sainte‐Bernadette

Saint‐Henri

Anna Malenfant

Arc‐en‐ciel

Des Bâtisseurs

Champlain

Percentages

target


Chart 27

Ernest‐Lang n= 11

Sainte‐Anne n= 18


Grade 5

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

District 03


sage du Haut‐

Madawaska

n= 23

Carrefour de la

Jeunesse

n= 5

Régionale Saint‐

Basilen= 28

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam

n= 42

Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerolle*

90

73

79

80

86

78

100

87

88

Élémentaire Sacré Coeur

Notre‐Dame

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph



Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang




Notre‐Dame n= 48


Mgr‐Lang n= 30


Echo Jeunesse n= 21

Mgr‐Martin n= 34

District 03 n= 414

Province n= 2220

32


Coeurn= 30


Andrén= 15

77

82

94

86

79

73

80

68

90

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Mgr‐Martin

Echo Jeunesse

Marie‐Immaculée

Mgr‐Lang


Grande‐Rivière


Percentages

target



Chart 28

n= 55

n= 37

n= 5

District 05

n= 21

Séjour‐Jeunesse*

n= 15


Saint‐Sauveur

La Croisée

Grade 5

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

École Carrefour‐

Étudiant

n= 59

n= 9

Le Domaine‐

Étudiant

Académie




Daigle

n= 39

97

60

62

62

56

61

78

82

Apollo‐XI


Séjour‐Jeunesse*

La Croisée






n= 36


n= 21

n= 10

Arthur‐Pinet n= 13

District 05 n= 378

Province n= 2220

33

n= 15

n= 23


Versant‐Nord

Apollo‐XI

Domaine‐des‐

Copainsn= 14

Assomption

Académie Notre‐

Dame

77

75

93

85

100

87

90

76

97

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05


Arthur‐Pinet



Versant‐Nord

Mgr‐Melanson

Apollo‐XI

Percentages

target



Chart 29




L'Amitié n= 27

La Source n= 42

La Ruche n= 76

La Passerelle n= 24

L'Envolée n= 51

L'Étincelle n= 11

La‐Rivière n= 10

Grade 5

Mathématiques

District 09


wrote the exam



Isidoren= 17

36

76

76

63

71

90

56

69

69

50

L'Étincelle

L'Envolée


La Passerelle

La Ruche

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine


Ola‐léger n= 13


District 09 n= 469

Province n= 2220

Marguerite‐

Bourgeoysn= 44



Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandren= 35

34

77

72

92

92

60

77

92

66

50

36

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09


Ola‐léger





La‐Rivière

L Étincelle

Percentages

target


Chart 30




Père‐Edgar‐T.‐n= 43


Mathématiques

5e année

District 11

Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 18


wrote the exam

La Marée‐

Montanten= 33


Sainte‐Annen= 16


83

87

88

69

78

69

59

76

82

83

Mont Carmel



Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue


W‐F‐Boisvert

Le Soleil‐Levant



Mont‐Carmel n= 12


Saint‐Paul* n= 4


Notre‐Dame n= 12

District 11 n= 367

Province n= 2220

LeBlancn= 43

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeoisn= 31


Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaudn= 41

35

77

75

66

65

92

63

67

83

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame


Saint‐Paul*

Camille‐Vautour

Mont‐Carmel

Percentages

target



Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Français exam by school, including the districts and province

36


Chart 31

District 01 n= 592

District 03 n= 414

District 05 n= 367

District 09 n= 460

District 11 n= 363

Province n= 2196

Chart 32

Grade 5

Français

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Français Exam by District, Including the

Province


wrote the exam

District 01 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Français Exam

80 8174

66 64

74

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

target





Saint‐Henri n= 79



Champlain n= 79

District 01 n= 592

Province n= 2196


wrote the exam

Samuel‐de‐

Champlainn= 70

37

74

80

78

75

72

82

80

85

88

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Champlain

Abbey‐Landry

Sainte‐Bernadette

Saint‐Henri

Anna Malenfant

Arc‐en‐ciel

Des Bâtisseurs

Champlain

Percentages

target


Chart 33

Ernest‐Lang n= 11

Sainte‐Anne n= 18


Régionale Saint‐

Basilen= 28


wrote the exam

Carrefour de la

Jeunessen= 42


sage du Haut‐

Madawaska

Grade 5

Français


n= 23

Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerolle*n= 5

72

83

83

80

86

72

100

78

90

Élémentaire Sacré Coeur

Notre‐Dame

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph



Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang




Notre‐Dame n= 47


Mgr‐Lang n= 30


Echo Jeunesse n= 21

Mgr‐Martin n= 34

District 03 n= 414

Province n= 2196


Coeurn= 29


Andrén= 15

38

74

81

88

86

85

60

53

83

72

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Mgr‐Martin

Echo Jeunesse

Marie‐Immaculée

Mgr‐Lang


Grande‐Rivière


Percentages

target



Chart 34

n= 56

n= 37

n= 5

La Croisée



wrote the exam



Saint‐Sauveurn= 9

Le Domaine‐

Étudiantn= 57

n= 33


Daigle

Académie n= 14

n= 19

Séjour‐Jeunesse*

Grade 5

Français

École Carrefour‐

Étudiant

97

57

59

79

82

65

67

68

Apollo‐XI


Séjour‐Jeunesse*

La Croisée






n= 35


n= 21

n= 10


District 05 n= 367

Province n= 2196

Versant‐Nord

Apollo‐XI

n= 14Domaine‐des‐

Copains

Assomption

39

Académie Notre‐

Damen= 23


n= 14

74

74

86

85

100

78

67

81

97

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05


Arthur‐Pinet



Versant‐Nord

Mgr‐Melanson

Apollo‐XI

Percentages

target



Chart 35




L'Amitié n= 27

La Source n= 42

La Ruche n= 74

La Passerelle n= 24

L'Envolée n= 50

L'Étincelle n= 9

La‐Rivière n= 11

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Français Exam


wrote the exam


Isidoren= 17

Grade 5

Français

District 09

56

68

76

92

55

71

37

64

56

56

L'Étincelle

L'Envolée


La Passerelle

La Ruche

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine


Ola‐léger n= 13


District 09 n= 460

Province n= 2196

Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandren= 34


Marguerite‐

Bourgeoysn= 42


40

74

66

75

69

60

86

77

62

73

56

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09


Ola‐léger





La‐Rivière

L Étincelle

Percentages

target


Chart 36




Grade 5

Français



wrote the exam

Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 20

La Marée‐

Montanten= 33


Sainte‐Annen= 14



67

81

74

57

63

64

67

64

64

70

Mont Carmel



Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue


W‐F‐Boisvert

Le Soleil‐Levant



Mont‐Carmel n= 12


Saint‐Paul* n= 4


Notre‐Dame n= 12

District 11 n= 363

Province n= 2196

LeBlancn= 42

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeoisn= 31


Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaudn= 41

41

74

64

54

59

75

25

67

67

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame


Saint‐Paul*

Camille‐Vautour

Mont‐Carmel

Percentages

target



Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 8 Sciences et technologies exam by school, including the districts and province

42


Chart 37

District 01 n= 573

District 03 n= 445

District 05 n= 381

District 09 n= 471

District 11 n= 373

Province n= 2243

Chart 38

Grade 8

Sciences et

technologies

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Sciences et technologies Exam by District,

Including the Province


wrote the exam

District 01 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Sciences et technologies Exam

8176

7168

73 74

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

target


Sainte‐Anne n= 91


Le Mascaret n= 188


District 01 n= 573

Province n= 2243


wrote the exam

Samuel‐de‐

Champlainn= 51

43

Carrefour de

l'Acadien= 184

74

81

70

75

84

89

89

84

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Abbey‐Landry

Le Mascaret

Carrefour de l'Acadie

Arc‐en‐ciel

Sainte‐Anne

Champlain

Percentages

target


Chart 39

Ernest‐Lang n= 7

Sainte‐Anne n= 25

Grade 8

Sciences et

technologies



wrote the exam

Carrefour de la

Jeunessen= 39

Centre

d'apprentissage du

Haut‐Madawaska

n= 21

Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerollen= 20

Régionale Saint‐n= 36 95

78

65

60

57

95

82

Saint‐Joseph



Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang





Notre‐Dame n= 48


Marie‐Gaétane n= 33

District 03 n= 445

Province n= 2243

Basilen= 36

Thomas‐Albert n= 94

A.‐J.‐Savoie n= 37

44

74

76

58

81

55

80

90

68

95

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Marie‐Gaétane

A.‐J.‐Savoie

Grande‐Rivière

Thomas‐Albert

Notre‐Dame

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph

Percentages

target


Chart 40

N= 86

N= 21

N= 9

N= 43

Grade 8

Sciences et

technologies



wrote the exam

Le Domaine‐

ÉtudiantN= 49

École Carrefour‐

ÉtudiantN= 39


DaigleN= 24

Place‐des‐Jeunes

Roland‐Pépin

La Croisée

Séjour‐Jeunesse

89

81

58

67

67

64

Séjour‐Jeunesse

La Croisée





N= 53

Arthur‐Pinet N= 16

District 05 N= 381

N= 2243

Académie Notre‐

DameN= 21

Versant‐Nord

Domaine‐des‐

CopainsN= 20

45

Province

74

71

95

50

81

81

74

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05


Arthur‐Pinet


Versant‐Nord

Roland‐Pépin

Percentages

target


Chart 41

n= 17

n= 22

n= 18

n= 15

n= 58

n= 58

n= 29

L'Envolée n= 52

É

Grade 8

Sciences et

technologies



wrote the exam

La Relève‐de‐

Saint‐Isidoren= 20

L'Amitié


Centre la fontaine

René‐Chouinard

La Source

La Ruche

La Passerelle

75

76

79

64

53

44

73

71


La Passerelle

Le Tremplin

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine


L'Étincelle n= 21

La‐Rivière n= 9


Ola‐léger n= 15


District 09 n= 471

Province n= 2243

Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandren= 32

Marguerite‐

Bourgeoysn= 41


46

74

68

71

87

64

66

75

50

44

38

77

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09


Ola‐léger





La‐Rivière

L'Étincelle

L'Envolée

Percentages

target


Chart 42




wrote the exam

Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 16

Grade 8

Sciences et

technologies


Secondaire

Assomptionn= 23

La Marée‐

Montanten= 35


Sainte‐Annen= 11

79

74

78

63

55

70

100

60

88



Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue


Secondaire Assomption

Le Soleil‐Levant




Mont‐Carmel n= 10

Saint‐Paul* n= 4


Notre‐Dame n= 19

District 11 n= 373

Province n= 2243

Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaudn= 33

47


LeBlancn= 27

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeoisn= 52



74

73

52

88

100

43

71

100

79

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame


Saint‐Paul*

Camille‐Vautour

Mont‐Carmel


Percentages

target



Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 8 Mathématiques exam by school, including the districts and province

48


Chart 43

District 01 n= 573

District 03 n= 447

District 05 n= 386

District 09 n= 452

District 11 n= 374

Province n= 2232

Chart 44

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam by District, Including

the Province


Grade 8

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

District 01

81 79

66 6571 73

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

target


Sainte‐Anne n= 92


Le Mascaret n= 186


District 01 n= 573

Province n= 2232

n= 53

Carrefour de

l'Acadien= 183


wrote the exam

Samuel‐de‐

Champlain

49

73

81

75

82

75

79

88

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Abbey‐Landry

Le Mascaret


Arc‐en‐ciel

Sainte‐Anne

Champlain

Percentages

target


Chart 45

Ernest‐Lang n= 7

Sainte‐Anne n= 25


Régionale Saint‐

Basilen= 36

Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerollen= 20

Centre

d'apprentissage du

Haut‐Madawaska

n= 21

District 03


wrote the exam

Carrefour de la

Jeunessen= 39

Grade 8

Mathématiques

73

86

86

70

60

71

95

79

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph



Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang

Centre d'apprentissage …




Notre‐Dame n= 48





District 03 n= 447

Province n= 2232

50

73

79

68

76

73

81

96

73

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Marie‐Gaétane

A.‐J.‐Savoie

Grande‐Rivière

Thomas‐Albert

Notre‐Dame

Saint‐Jacques

Percentages

target


Chart 46

Place‐des‐Jeunes n= 86

Séjour‐Jeunesse n= 9

Roland‐Pépin n= 41




Daiglen= 24

La Croisée n= 21

District 05


wrote the exam

Grade 8

Mathématiques

Le Domaine‐

Étudiantn= 49

École Carrefour‐

Étudiantn= 43

66

100

48

54

70

57

73

Roland‐Pépin

Séjour‐Jeunesse

La Croisée






District 05 n= 386

Province n= 2232

51

Domaine‐des‐

Copainsn= 20

Académie Notre‐

Damen= 22

73

66

65

26

77

75

66

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05


Arthur‐Pinet


Versant‐Nord

Roland‐Pépin

Percentages

target


Graphique 47


Centre la fontaine* n= 0


L'Amitié n= 16

La Source n= 57

Le Tremplin n= 59

La Passerelle n= 28

L'Envolée n= 52

L'Étincelle n= 21

La‐Rivière n= 10

Mathématiques

8e année

District 09

Nombre d'élèves qui

ont écrit l'examen


Isidoren= 20

Pourcentage d'élèves au niveau acceptable et plus à l'examen de mathématiques 8e année

57

63

70

57

64

72

50

33

65

L'Étincelle

L'Envolée


La Passerelle

Le Tremplin

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine*



Ola‐léger n= 14


District 09 n= 452

Province n= 2232


Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandren= 33

Marguerite‐

Bourgeoysn= 41

52

73

65

79

57

64

68

82

64

50

57

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09


Ola‐léger





La‐Rivière

L'Étincelle

Percentages

target

*Results from this school were not published for exceptional reasons.


Chart 48





La Marée‐

Montanten= 35

Secondaire

Assomptionn= 23


Sainte‐Annen= 11


wrote the exam

Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 16


Grade 8

Mathématiques

District 11

72

59

76

76

45

65

100

54

81



Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue



Le Soleil‐Levant



Mont‐Carmel n= 10


Saint‐Paul* n= 4


Notre‐Dame n= 19

District 11 n= 374

Province n= 2232

LeBlancn= 27

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeoisn= 54

Blanche‐Bourgeois

53

n= 16

Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaudn= 33

73

71

36

81

89

79

88

100

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame


Saint‐Paul*

Camille‐Vautour

Mont‐Carmel

Bourgeois

Percentages

target



Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the Grade 8 Français exam by school, including the districts and province

54


Chart 49

District 01 n= 570

District 03 n= 444

District 05 n= 380

District 09 n= 470

District 11 n= 370

Province n= 2234

Chart 50

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Français Exam by District, Including the

Province


Grade 8

Français


wrote the exam

District 01

69 68 65

73

56

67

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

target


Sainte‐Anne n= 91


Le Mascaret n= 185


District 01 n= 570

Province n= 2234

55


wrote the exam

Samuel‐de‐

Champlainn= 54

Carrefour de

l'Acadien= 181

67

69

68

68

68

89

70

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Abbey‐Landry

Le Mascaret


Arc‐en‐ciel

Sainte‐Anne

Champlain

Percentages

target


Chart 51

Ernest‐Lang n= 7

Sainte‐Anne n= 25

n= 36


Grade 8

Français

District 03


wrote the exam

Carrefour de la

Jeunessen= 39

Centre

d'apprentissage du

Haut‐Madawaska

n= 20

Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerollen= 19

Régionale Saint‐

Basile

70

68

72

74

52

71

70

79

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph



Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang

Centre d'apprentissage …




Notre‐Dame n= 48





District 03 n= 444

Province n= 2234

56

67

68

67

76

41

57

83

70

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Marie‐Gaétane

A.‐J.‐Savoie

Grande‐Rivière

Thomas‐Albert

Notre‐Dame

Saint‐Jacques

Percentages

target


Chart 52

Place‐des‐Jeunes n= 83

n= 21

Séjour‐Jeunesse n= 9

Roland‐Pépin n= 41


Grade 8

Français

District 05

Le Domaine‐

Étudiantn= 48

École Carrefour‐

Étudiant


wrote the exam

n= 41

La Croisée



Daiglen= 24

Académie Notre‐n= 22 85

67

62

67

83

54

55

Roland‐Pépin

Séjour‐Jeunesse

La Croisée






District 05 n= 380

Province n= 2234

57

Damen= 22

Domaine‐des‐

Copainsn= 20

67

65

55

37

64

73

85

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05


Arthur‐Pinet


Versant‐Nord

Roland‐Pépin

Percentages

target


Chart 53




L'Amitié n= 16

La Source n= 58

Le Tremplin n= 58

La Passerelle n= 29

L'Envolée n= 49

L'Étincelle n= 20

La‐Rivière n= 10

Grade 8

Français



Isidoren= 20


wrote the exam

45

84

80

76

88

71

50

50

82

47

L'Étincelle

L'Envolée


La Passerelle

Le Tremplin

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine



Ola‐léger n= 15

n= 14

District 09 n= 470

Province n= 2234

58


Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandren= 33

Marguerite‐

Bourgeoysn= 40


67

73

79

67

57

83

81

67

70

45

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09


Ola‐léger





La‐Rivière

L'Étincelle

Percentages

target


Chart 54






Secondaire

Assomptionn= 23


Sainte‐Annen= 11

n= 27

Grade 8

Français

District 11


wrote the exam

Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 16

La Marée‐

Montanten= 34

62

44

68

59

36

39

68

53

75



Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue



Le Soleil‐Levant



Mont‐Carmel n= 10


Saint‐Paul * n= 4


Notre‐Dame n= 19

District 11 n= 370

Province n= 2234

59

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeoisn= 53


LeBlancn= 27

Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaudn= 33

67

56

36

63

63

43

58

80

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame


Saint‐Paul *

Camille‐Vautour

Mont‐Carmel

Bourgeois

Percentages

target



Elementary school results by sex, including the districts and province

60


Reading comprehension

Chart 55

District Boys Girls

01 349 347

03 212 224

05 184 166

09 197 185

11 201 174

Province 1143 1096

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Silent Reading Test by Sex and by District, Including the Province

Grade 2

Literacy


wrote the exam

73 7368

72 70 71

8073 70

81 8178

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

Garçons Filles

target

Oral reading

Chart 56

District Boys Girls

01 347 348

03 212 224

05 184 164

09 197 185

11 201 174

Province 1141 1095

Grade 2

Literacy


wrote the exam

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Oral Reading Test by Sex and by District, Including the Province

61

6977

69

79

6772

8375

8288

83 82

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

Garçons Filles

target


Chart 57

District Boys Girls

01 332 320

03 200 207

05 183 155

09 206 206

11 180 185

Province 1101 1073

Grade 3

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam by Sex and by District, Including

the Province

7782

64

73

64

7378

83

66

75

64

74

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

Garçons Filles

target

Chart 58

District Boys Girls

01 277 271

03 195 217

05 169 166

09 197 196

11 176 201

Province 1014 1051


wrote the exam

Grade 4

Literacy

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Grade 4 Literacy Assessment by Sex and by District, Including the

Province

62

56

46

6759

38

53

6569

7478

50

67

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

Garçons Filles

target


Chart 59

District Boys Girls

01 253 346

03 196 225

05 198 186

09 264 213

11 184 189

Province 1095 1159


wrote the exam

Grade 5

Sciences et

technologies

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 5 Sciences & technologies Exam by Sex and by District,


87

74 72 7074 76

8085

80 78 7580

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

Garçons Filles

target

Chart 60

District Boys Girls

01 253 346

03 196 225

05 198 186

09 264 213

11 184 189

Province 1095 1159

63


the ProvinceNumber of students who

wrote the examen

Grade 5

Mathématiques

81 7872 69

74 7581

8579 76 76

80

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

Garçons Filles

target


Chart 61

District Boys Girls

01 253 346

03 196 224

05 198 186

09 264 213

11 184 187

Province 1095 1156

Grade 5

Français

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 8 Français Exam by Sex and by District, Including the

ProvinceNumber of students who

wrote the exam

7370

65

56 5664

8591

8579

73

83

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

Garçons Filles

target

Chart 62

District Boys Girls

01 273 307

03 214 238

05 216 179

09 230 253

11 203 174

Province 1136 1151

64

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 8 Sciences & technologies Exam by Sex and by District,


Grade 8

Sciences et

technologies


wrote the examen

7974 72

6771 73

8379

70 68

76 76

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

Garçons Filles

target


Chart 63

District Boys Girls

01 273 307

03 215 237

05 214 181

09 218 243

11 203 174

Province 1123 1142


the Province

Grade 8

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

77 76

6561

66 69

84 83

67 68

77 77

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

Garçons Filles

target

Chart 64

District Boys Girls

01 273 307

03 215 240

05 216 182

09 231 254

11 203 174

Province 1138 1157

65

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 8 Français Exam by Sex and by District, Including the

Province

Grade 8 Français


wrote the exam

57 56 5661

43

55

7975

68

80

7075

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

Garçons Filles

target


66

Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results

Chapter 3

Provincial High School Examination Results

Provincial Evaluation Program at the High School Level


The provincial high school examinations areintended to provide provincial certification ofstudies done in Grade 11 Français andGrade 11 Mathématiques. Students enrolledin regular courses write one set of exams and

Grade 10 students’ ESL oral proficiency isreported using a five-level scale. The studentsreceive a certificate attesting to their level ofESL proficiency. Oral proficiency results donot affect Grade 10 ESL course marks.

The results reported in this chapter indicatethe situation for the entire 2010-20111 school

67

Chapter 3

Provincial High School Examination Results

Provincial Evaluation Program at the High School Level


The provincial high school examinations areintended to provide provincial certification ofstudies done in Grade 11 Français andGrade 11 Mathématiques. Students enrolledin regular courses write one set of exams, andthose enrolled in modified courses writeanother.

The provincial exams also assess ESL OralProficiency in Grade 10.

What is the passing grade?

The final passing grade is 55% for Grade 11Français and Mathématiques. The final gradeconsists of 60% of the school mark and 40%of the provincial exam mark.

Grade 10 students’ ESL oral proficiency isreported using a five-level scale. The studentsreceive a certificate attesting to their level ofESL proficiency. Oral proficiency results donot affect Grade 10 ESL course marks.

The results reported in this chapter indicatethe situation for the entire 2010-20111 schoolyear by combining the results for bothsemesters, except in the case of Grade 11Français, which is a full-year course .

__________________1 January and June results are combined on the premise that the exams given in the two semesters are equivalent. The experts who help develop and correct the provincial examinations ensure that the exams given in the two semesters are as parallel as possible.

Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3

Chart 65Provincial exam enrolment rates by course and sex

45%

74%

42%

55%

26%

58%

Mathématiques 11

Français 11 (mod.)

Français 11 (rég.)

Provincial exam enrolmentrates by course and sex

Chart 65 clearly shows that boys have atendency to enrol in modified courses. We alsosee that female enrolment rates areconsistently higher in all regular courses.

The gap is especially pronounced in themodified Grade 11 Français course, with boysaccounting for 74% of enrolments and girls for26%. The difference in enrolment rates showsgirls predominant in the following regularcourses: Grade 11 Français (by 16percentage points) and Grade 11Mathématiques (by 10 percentage points)..

68

58%

45%

42%

55%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Mathématiques 11 (mod.)

Mathématiques 11 (rég.)

Percentages

Boys Girls


Chart 66

Regular level

% of N.B. students enrolled in

regular courses

Grade 11 Mathématiques: 81%

Grade 11 Français: 91%

Provincial Exam Averages by Subject and Sex - Regular Level

67

59

6663

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

Ave

rag

e

Do the provincial exam results differ according to sex?

The provincial results (Charts 66 and 67)show that in the regular courses, girlsoutperformed boys in Mathématiques. Maleand female performance was significantlyequal in Français. In the modified courses,girls and boys obtained comparable results inFrançais, whereas the boys outperformed thegirls in Mathématiques.

Chart 67

Modified level

% of N.B. students enrolled in

modified courses

Grade 11 Français: 11%

Grade 11 Mathématiques: 18%

Provincial Exam Averages by Subject and Sex - Modified Level

69

63

58

63

58

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

Français 11 Mathématiques 11

Ave

rag

e

Boys Girls

40Français 11 Mathématiques 11

Boys Girls

En français 11e, la moyenne provinciale (garçons et filles combinés) est de 61 % et en mathématiques, de 66 %.The provincial average (boys and girls combined) is 63% in Grade 11 Français and 59% in Grade 11 Mathématiques.

The provincial average (boys and girls combined) is 59% in Grade 11 Français and60% in Grade 11 Mathématiques .

N.B. .: Differences in averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.


Chart 68

District Boys Girls

01 262 291

03 243 211

05 227 185

09 229 245

11 234 180

Province 1195 1112


were interviewed

Grade 10 English Second Language

Percentage of Students at Intermediate Level or Higher on ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment, by Sex and District, Including the

Province

96

40

69

38

98

69

96

53

68

43

98

72

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100


Per

cen

tag

es

target

Chart 69

70

Percentage of Students at Each ESL Oral Proficiency Level , by Sex, for the Province

1 17

23

33

29

70 0 4

23

3032

10

0

10

20

30

40

Exempté Non cotable Novice De base Intermédiaire Avancé Supérieur

Per

cen

tag

es

Boys Girls

Boys Girls


Difference between provincial exam average and school mark average

71


Is there an appreciable difference between the exam marks and theschool marks?

Charts 70 to 81 show that there is often an appreciable difference between provincial exammarks and school marks. This difference is especially pronounced for the regular courses,with school marks being as much as 24 percentage points higher. For a district overall, thegap generally hovers around 14 percentage points. In the modified courses, the differencebetween provincial exam marks and school marks is smaller, hovering around 9 percentagepoints, although it may be as high as 13 percentage points, depending on the course andthe district.

72


Chart 70

Regular level

District 01 n= 432

District 03 n= 387

District 05 n= 286

District 09 n= 375

District 11 n= 293

Province n= 1773


wrote the exam

Français 11 Averages by District - Regular Level

Grade 11

Français

73 74 76 74 70 73

64 62 62 6257

61

0

20

40

60

80

100

Di t i t 01 Di t i t 03 Di t i t 05 Di t i t 09 Di t i t 11 P i

Per

cen

tag

e

Français 10331 and 10332 averages by district -school marks and provincial exam marks

The Français curricula are based on a communicative approach, whichexplains why the Français examination consists of two tests, a readingtest and a writing test, each worth 50%. The mark for the writing testincludes a “language” component (60%) and a “discourse andcommunication” component (40%).

Chart 71

Modified level

District 01 n= 43

District 03 n= 42

District 05 n= 17

District 09 n= 51

District 11 n= 32

Province n= 185


wrote the exam

73

Français 11 averagesby District - Modified Level

0District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province

School mark Provincial exam

62 62 62 60 61 616156 57 60

5558

0

20

40

60

80

100


Per

cen

tag

e


N.B. Differences in averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.


Chart 72

Regular level

Grade 11

Français

Province‐wide difference

between provincial exam

average and school mark

average: ‐11,9 percentage

points

Difference, by School, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average in Français 10331

-21,7

-18,8

-18,8

-16,0

-16,0

-14,1

-13,3

-13,0

-12,9

-12,8

-11,9

-11,9

-11,2

-10,3

-9,5

-9,4

-9,2

-7,7

-6,2

-5,9

-5,7

-1,4

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne

Clément-Cormier

Carrefour Beausoleil

Thomas-Albert

Louis-Mailloux

Sainte-Anne

Marie-Gaétane

Cité-des-Jeunes

Centre La fontaine

Secondaire Népisiguit


Province

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard

W.-A.-Losier

Samuel-de-Champlain

Mathieu-Martin

Marie-Esther

Roland-Pépin

Louis-J.-Robichaud

Grande-Rivière

L'Odyssée

A.-J.-Savoie

Chart 73

Regular level

74

Difference, by District, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average in Français 10331

-23,6

21,7

-30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5

Aux quatre vents

Rég. de Baie Sainte Anne

Percentage points

-13,6

-13,4

-12,1

-12,0

-11,9

-9,3

-15 -10 -5 0 5 10

District 05

District 11

District 03

District 09

Province

District 01

Percentage points


Chart 74

Modified level

Grade 11

Français




average: ‐3.3 percentage

points


-10,6-6,4-6,4

-5,6-4,0-3,5-3,3

-1,5-0,8-0,7

0,27,2

15 10 5 0 5 10

Grande-Rivière**Carrefour Beausoleil**

Sainte-Anne*Thomas-Albert*Marie-Gaétane*

Aux quatre vents*Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne*

Secondaire Assomption*Centre La fontaine*

Samuel-de-Champlain*A.-J.-Savoie*

Clément-CormierLouis-Mailloux

Cité-des-JeunesMgr-M.-F.-Richard

Louis-J.-RobichaudSecondaire Népisiguit

ProvinceRoland-Pépin

Mathieu-MartinL'Odyssée

W.-A.-LosierMarie-Esther

Chart 75

Modified level

75


-15 -10 -5 0 5 10

Percentage points

-6,4

-6,0

-4,3

-3,3

-1,7

-0,3

-10 -5 0 5

District 11

District 03

District 05

Province

District 01

District 09

Percentage points

* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.** These schools had no students who wrote the modified-level exam


Chart 76

Regular level

District 01 n= 449

District 03 n= 348

District 05 n= 237

District 09 n= 335

District 11 n= 303

Province n= 1672

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

Mathématiques 11 Averagesby District - Regular Level

7771

76 74 76 7570

63 6268 65 66

0

20

40

60

80

100


Per

cen

tag

e

Mathématiques 30311 and 30312 averages by district -school marks and provincial exam marks

In Mathématiques, more than 80% of students write their exam in January, at the end of the first semester of Grade 11. Generally speaking, students display a satisfactory understanding of mathematical concepts and their decontextualized application. The main challenges lie with the problem-solving component, but students are increasingly demonstrating effective solving strategies.

Province n= 1672

Chart 77

Modified level

District 01 n= 61

District 03 n= 112

District 05 n= 35

District 09 n= 145

District 11 n= 49

Province n= 402

76


wrote the exam

Mathématiques 11 Averages, by District, Modified Level



63 6168 66 63 6463 63

56

6657

63

0

20

40

60

80

100


Per

cen

tag

e


N.B. Differences in averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.


Chart 78

Regular level

Grade 11

Mathématiques





points

Difference, by School, between the Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average in Mathématiques 30311

-21,6

-14,5

-14,4

-13,2

-12,4

-12,1

-11,8

-11,8

-11,6

-8,7

-8,2

-8,0

-8,0

-7,8

-6,3

-5,7

-4,4

-4,3

-3,8

-0,7

-0,5

1,8

Roland-Pépin*

Aux quatre vents

Clément-Cormier

Thomas-Albert

A.-J.-Savoie

Marie-Gaétane

Louis-J.-Robichaud


Centre La fontaine


Province

L'Odyssée

Marie-Esther

Louis-Mailloux

Sainte-Anne

Samuel-de-Champlain

Mathieu-Martin

Cité-des-Jeunes


Grande-Rivière

W.-A.-Losier

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard


Chart 79

Regular level

77

Difference, by District, between the Provincial Mark Average and the School Mark Average in Mathématiques 30311

-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5

p

Percentage points

-14,2

-10,4

-8,7

-8,2

-7,0

-6,2

-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5

District 05

District 11

Province

District 03

District 01

District 09

Percentage points

* The exam was not administered for the first trimester due to exceptionalcircumstances.


Chart 80

Modified level

Grade 11

Mathématiques





points

Difference, by School, between the Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average in Mathématiques 30312

-13,3

-10,8

-8,9

-8,4

-7,1

-6,6

-3,3

-1,0

0,2

0,5

0,5

1,0

5,0

6,5

6,8

Roland-Pépin**

Centre La fontaine*

Samuel-de-Champlain*

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne*

Carrefour Beausoleil*

Secondaire Assomption*

Grande-Rivière*

Marie-Gaétane*


Clément-Cormier

Province

Marie-Esther

Aux quatre vents

Louis-J.-Robichaud

Louis-Mailloux

L'Odyssée

Mathieu-Martin

Cité-des-Jeunes

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard

Thomas-Albert

A.-J.-Savoie

W.-A.-Losier

Sainte-Anne

Chart 81

Modified levelDifference, by District, between the Provincial Exam Average and

School Mark Average in Mathématiques 30312

78

-15 -10 -5 0 5 10

Roland-Pépin**

Percentage points

-12,8

-11,0

-8,9

-8,5

-7,0

-7,0

-15 -10 -5 0 5 10

District 05

District 11

Province

District 03

District 09

District 01

Percentage points

* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.** The exam was not administered for the first trimester due to exceptionalcircumstances.


Performance indices for Français and Mathématiques by school, including the districts and province

79


What is the performance index?

The performance index gives the percentage of students in regular and modified courseswho earned a passing mark on the regular-level examinations. Since one objective of theeducation system is to prepare students for post-secondary studies, it is important that theybe able to pass the regular-level exams. This is an excellent indicator of their level ofpreparedness for post-secondary education.

Sample performance index calculation

Say that 75% of all students at school X are enrolled in the regular Mathématiques course.

Now say that 64% of the students who wrote the regular-level Mathématiques exam passed it .

The performance index is then calculated as follows:

(75 64)/100 = 48

Consequently, it can be said that 48% of all students at school X passed the regular-level Mathématiques exam. The performance index for school X is 48 for the Mathématiques

80

course.


Chart 82

Grade 11

Français

Performance Index by School for Grade 11 Français

67

58

72

73

65

58

69

75

53

64

62

44

64

60

0 20 40 60 80 100

Mathieu-Martin

L'Odyssée

Sainte-Anne

Samuel-de-Champlain

District 01

Marie-Gaétane

A.-J.-Savoie

Grande-Rivière

Thomas-Albert

Cité-des-Jeunes

District 03

Aux-Quatre-Vents

Roland-Pépin

S d i Né i i it

81

60

57

58

62

50

48

55

42

57

46

52

39

90

48

58


District 05

Louis-Mailloux

Marie-Esther

W.-Arthur-Losier

La fontaine

District 09

Clément-Cormier

Louis-J.-Robichaud

Rég. De Baie-Sainte-Anne


Mgr-M.-F.-Richard


District 11

Province

Percentage points

target


Chart 83Performance Index by School for Grade 11 Mathématiques

Grade 11

Mathématiques

68

67

73

87

70

33

37

68

47

57

51

45

0 20 40 60 80 100

Mathieu-Martin

L'Odyssée

Sainte-Anne

Samuel-de-Champlain

District 01

Marie-Gaétane

A.-J.-Savoie

Grande-Rivière

Thomas-Albert

Cité-des-Jeunes

District 03

Aux-Quatre-Vents

Roland-Pépin *

82

55

52

63

51

47

50

53

55

49

84

52

78

83

58

57

Roland-Pépin


District 05

Louis-Mailloux

Marie-Esther

W.-Arthur-Losier

Centre La fontaine

District 09

Clément-Cormier

Louis-J.-Robichaud

Rég. De Baie-Sainte-Anne


Mgr-M.-F.-Richard


District 11

Province

Percentage points

target

* The exam was not administered for the first trimester due to exceptional circumstances.


Chart 84 District and Provincial Performance Indices for Grade 11 Français since 2007

Grade 11

Français

30

40

50

60

70

80

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Perform

ance index

District 01 District 03 District 05

District 09 District 11 Province

Chart 85 District and Provincial Performance Indices for Grade 11 Mathématiques since 2007

83

Grade 11

Mathématiques

30

40

50

60

70

80

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Perform

ance index

District 01 District 03 District 05

District 09 District 11 Province


Percentage of students having achieved intermediate level or higher on the Grade 10 ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment, by school, including the districts and province

Second language oral proficiency scale

Novice Able to satisfy immediate needs using rehearsed phrases. No real autonomy of expression, flexibility, or spontaneity. Can ask questions or make statements with reasonable accuracy but only with memorized phrases. Vocabulary is very limited.

Basic Able to create with the language by combining and recombining learned elements. Can satisfy minimum courtesy requirements and maintain very simple face-to-face interaction with native speakers accustomed to dealing with second language learners. Almost every utterance contains fractured syntax and grammatical errors. Vocabulary is adequate to express most elementary needs.

Intermediate* Able to initiate and maintain routine conversations and satisfy predictable requirements in

84

Able to initiate and maintain routine conversations and satisfy predictable requirements in school/work settings. Able to provide autobiographical information in some detail and give explanations with some degree of accuracy, but language is awkward . Able to state facts and narrate, describe, report on and speak of current, past, and future activities. Can give directions from one place to another; can give accurate instructions in a field of personal expertise. Has a speaking vocabulary to converse simply, with some paraphrasing. Accent, though often quite faulty, is intelligible. Uses high-frequency language structures accurately, but does not have a thorough or confident control of grammar. In certain situations, diction would probably distract a native speaker.

* Intermediate is the level expected of students at the end of Grade 10.


AdvancedAble to speak the language with sufficient structural accuracy and vocabulary to participate effectively in most formal and in all informal conversations, on practical, social, and academic or work-related topics. Control of grammar is good and speech is fluent. Can describe in detail and narrate accurately. Can discuss abstract topics and ideas as well as events. Can support opinions and hypothesize. Accent may be obvious but never interferes with understanding. Sporadic errors still occur, but they would not distract a native speaker or interfere with communication.

SuperiorAble to use the language fluently and accurately on all levels normally pertinent to personal situation (academic, social, work-related).Can understand and participate in any conversation with a high degree of fluency and precision of vocabulary.Accent is good, but the speaker would not necessarily be taken for a native speaker.

85


Chart 86

Sainte‐Anne n=97

L'Odyssée n=185

Mathieu‐Martin n=237

District 01 n=553

Cité‐des‐Jeunes n=261

Thomas‐Albert n=103

Grande‐Rivière n=22

A.‐J.‐Savoie n=38

Marie‐Gaétane n=30

District 03 n=454

Number of students

interviewed:

Samuel‐de‐

Champlain

Grade 10 English

Second Language

n=34

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Intermediate Level or Higher on ESL Proficiency Assessment , at Grade 10, by School

62

69

46

10

13

77

83

38

96

98

95

92

97

Roland-Pépin


District 03

Marie-Gaétane

A.-J.-Savoie

Grande-Rivière

Thomas-Albert

Cité-des-Jeunes

District 01

Mathieu-Martin

L'Odyssée

Sainte-Anne

Samuel-de-Champlain

Secondaire Népisigu n=255

Aux quatre vents n=60

District 05 n=412

Centre La Fontaine n=48

W.‐A.‐Losier n=183

Marie‐Esther n=114

Louis‐Mailloux n=129

District 09 n=474

Carrefour Beausoleil n=17

Mgr‐M.‐F.‐Richard n=60

Rég. de Baie‐Sainte‐An=13

Clément‐Cormier n=116

District 11 n=414

Province n=2307

86

Roland‐Pépin

Secondaire

Assomption

Louis‐J.‐Robichaud

n=97

n=26

n=182

70

98

97

97

100

100

100

100

40

32

40

34

88

68

78

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11

Clément-Cormier

Louis-J.-Robichaud



Mgr-M.-F.-Richard


District 09

Louis-Mailloux

Marie-Esther

W.-A.-Losier

Centre La Fontaine

District 05

Aux quatre vents

p

Percentages

cible


Percentage of students having achieved a provincial exam result of 55% or more (acceptable level) or 70% (competent level) by subject and school, including the districts and province, since 2007

87

Percentage of students having achieved a provincial exam result of 55% or more (acceptable level) or 70% (competent level) by subject and school, including the districts and province, since 2007


Regular level

Chart 87

2007 2008 2009

School 173 173 188

District 404 451 414

Province 2027 2026 1961

2010 2011

School 191 201

District 444 456

Province 1639 1879

Français

Grade 11

District 01 École Mathieu‐Martin


wrote the exam

Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages

School (55 % +) District 01 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)


Regular level

Chart 88

2007 2008 2009

School 183 186 189


Province 1999 1874 1956

2010 2011

School 204 198

District 464 454

Province 1803 1696

Mathématiques

Grade 11


wrote the exam

88

Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 89

2007 2008 2009

School 151 147 137


Province 2027 2026 1961

2010 2011

School 137 138

District 444 456

Province 1639 1879


wrote the exam

District 01 École L'Odyssée

Français

Grade 11


0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 90

2007 2008 2009

School 137 160 137


Province 1999 1874 1956

2010 2011

School 146 145

District 464 454

Province 1803 1696

Mathématiques

Grade 11


wrote the exam

89


0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 91

2007 2008 2009

School 59 97 58


Province 2027 2026 1961

2010 2011

School 84 90

District 444 456

Province 1639 1879


wrote the exam

District 01 École Sainte‐Anne

Français

Grade 11


0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 92

2007 2008 2009

School 60 87 68


Province 1999 1874 1956

2010 2011

School 84 83

District 464 454

Province 1803 1696

Mathématiques

Grade 11


wrote the exam

90


0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 93

2007 2008 2009

School 21 34 31


Province 2027 2026 1961

2010 2011

School 32 27

District 444 456

Province 1639 1879


wrote the exam

District 01 École Samuel‐de‐Champlain

Français

Grade 11


0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 94

2007 2008 2009

School 23 31 36


Province 1999 1874 1956

2010 2011

School 30 28

District 464 454

Province 1803 1696


wrote the exam

Mathématiques

Grade 11

91


0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 95

2007 2008 2009

School 28 41 30


Province 2027 2026 1961

2010 2011

School 32 36

District 359 391

Province 1639 1879


wrote the exam

District 03 École Marie‐Gaétane

Français

Grade 11


0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 96

2007 2008 2009

School 22 38 37


Province 1999 1874 1956

2010 2011

School 31 34

District 357 349

Province 1803 1696

Mathématiques

Grade 11


wrote the exam

92


0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 97

2007 2008 2009

School 51 43 49


Province 2027 2026 1961

2010 2011

School 40 44

District 359 391

Province 1639 1879


wrote the exam

District 03 Polyvalente A.‐J.‐Savoie

Français

Grade 11


0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 98

2007 2008 2009

School 45 52 53


Province 1999 1874 1956

2010 2011

School 40 38

District 357 349

Province 1803 1696


wrote the exam

93

Mathématiques

Grade 11


0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 99

2007 2008 2009

School 26 24 17


Province 2027 2026 1961

2010 2011

School 15 19

District 359 391

Province 1639 1879


wrote the exam

Français

Grade 11

District 03 École Grande‐Rivière


0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 100

2007 2008 2009

School 31 24 16


Province 1999 1874 1956

2010 2011

School 13 16

District 357 349

Province 1803 1696

Mathématiques

Grade 11


wrote the exam


94

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 101

2007 2008 2009

School 98 106 98


Province 2027 2026 1961

2010 2011

School 86 90

District 359 391

Province 1639 1879


wrote the exam


Polyvalente Thomas‐Albert

Français

Grade 11

District 03

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 102

2007 2008 2009

School 99 93 95


Province 1999 1874 1956

2010 2011

School 90 75

District 357 349

Province 1803 1696


wrote the exam

Mathématiques

Grade 11


95

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 103

2007 2008 2009

School 230 241 224


Province 2027 2026 1961

2010 2011

School 186 202

District 359 391

Province 1639 1879

District 03 Cité‐des‐Jeunes A.‐M.‐Sormany

Français

Grade 11



wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 104

2007 2008 2009

School 220 246 225


Province 1999 1874 1956

2010 2011

School 183 186

District 357 349

Province 1803 1696


wrote the exam


Mathématiques

Grade 11

96

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 105

2007 2008 2009

School 66 72 49


Province 2027 2026 1961

2010 2011

School 63 62

District 128 316

Province 1639 1879


wrote the exam

District 05 École Aux quatre vents

Français

Grade 11


0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 106

2007 2008 2009

School 78 74 55


Province 1999 1874 1956

2010 2011

School 65 61

District 318 252

Province 1803 1696

Mathématiques

Grade 11


wrote the exam


97

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 107

2007 2008 2009

School 72 93 85


Province 2027 2026 1961

2010 2011

School 65 75

District 128 316

Province 1639 1879


wrote the exam

District 05 Polyvalente Roland‐Pépin*


Français

Grade 11

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 108

2007 2008 2009

School 83 109 99


Province 1999 1874 1956

2010 2011

School 88 2

District 318 252

Province 1803 1696

* Exam was not administer in January 2011 due to exceptional reasons.


wrote the exam

Mathématiques

Grade 11


98

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 109

2007 2008 2009

School 237 183 214


Province 2027 2026 1961

2010 2011

School 0 179

District 128 316

Province 1639 1879

District 05 École Secondaire Népisiguit *

Français

Grade 11



wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Pourcen

tages



* Results were not published for exceptional reasons in 2010.

Regular level

Chart 110

2007 2008 2009

School 234 35 218


Province 1999 1874 1956

2010 2011

School 165 189

District 318 252

Province 1803 1696

* The exam was optional in January 2008 because of an exceptional situation.


wrote the exam


99

Mathématiques

Grade 11

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 111

2007 2008 2009

School 124 110 120


Province 2027 2026 1961

2010 2011

School 114 125

District 411 402

Province 1639 1879

Français

Grade 11


wrote the exam


District 09 Polyvalente Louis‐Mailloux

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 112

2007 2008 2009

School 111 117 108


Province 1999 1874 1956

2010 2011

School 118 111

District 361 337

Province 1803 1696

Mathématiques

Grade 11


100


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 113

2007 2008 2009

School 122 120 114


Province 2027 2026 1961

2010 2011

School 115 106

District 411 402

Province 1639 1879


wrote the exam


District 09 École Marie‐Esther

Français

Grade 11

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 114

2007 2008 2009

School 102 111 110


Province 1999 1874 1956

2010 2011

School 91 102

District 361 337

Province 1803 1696

Mathématiques

Grade 11


wrote the exam


101

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 115

2007 2008 2009

School 179 196 165


Province 2027 2026 1961

2010 2011

School 148 147

District 411 402

Province 1639 1879

District 09 Polyvalente W.‐Arthur‐Losier

Français

Grade 11


wrote the exam


0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 116

2007 2008 2009

School 158 149 116


Province 1999 1874 1956

2010 2011

School 119 99

District 361 337

Province 1803 1696


wrote the exam


102

Mathématiques

Grade 11

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 117

2007 2008 2009

School 43 34 36


Province 2027 2026 1961

2010 2011

School 34 24

District 411 402

Province 1639 1879

District 09 Centre scolaire‐communautaire La Fontaine

Français

Grade 11


wrote the exam


0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 118

2007 2008 2009

School 44 31 40


Province 1999 1874 1956

2010 2011

School 33 25

District 361 337

Province 1803 1696


wrote the exam

Mathématiques

Grade 11


103

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 119

2007 2008 2009

School 115 96 105


Province 2027 2026 1961

2010 2011

School 107 108

District 297 314

Province 1639 1879


wrote the exam

District 11 École Clément‐Cormier


Français

Grade 11

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 120

2007 2008 2009

School 117 99 112


Province 1999 1874 1956

2010 2011

School 109 103

District 303 304

Province 1803 1696

Mathématiques

Grade 11


wrote the exam


104

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 121

2007 2008 2009

School 137 120 134


Province 2027 2026 1961

2010 2011

School 106 92

District 297 314

Province 1639 1879


wrote the exam


District 11 École Louis‐J.‐Robichaud

Français

Grade 11

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 122

2007 2008 2009

School 141 127 134


Province 1999 1874 1956

2010 2011

School 109 109

District 303 304

Province 1803 1696

Mathématiques

Grade 11


wrote the exam


105

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 123

2007 2008 2009

School 9 12 9


Province 2027 2026 1961

2010 2011

School 6 22

District 297 314

Province 1639 1879

District 11 École Régionale de Baie‐Sainte‐Anne

Français

Grade 11


wrote the exam


0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 124

2007 2008 2009

School 11 10 9


Province 1999 1874 1956

2010 2011

School 11 18

District 303 304

Province 1803 1696

Mathématiques

Grade 11


wrote the exam

106


0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 125

2007 2008 2009

School 21 23 23


Province 2027 2026 1961

2010 2011

School 16 21

District 297 314

Province 1639 1879


wrote the exam


District 11 École Secondaire Assomption

Français

Grade 11

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 126

2007 2008 2009

School 24 26 28


Province 1999 1874 1956

2010 2011

School 18 22

District 303 304

Province 1803 1696

Mathématiques

Grade 11


wrote the exam


107

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 127

2007 2008 2009

School 57 51 65


Province 2027 2026 1961

2010 2011

School 55 61

District 297 314

Province 1639 1879


wrote the exam

Français

Grade 11


District 11 École Mgr‐M.‐F.‐Richard

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 128

2007 2008 2009

School 65 57 61


Province 1999 1874 1956

2010 2011

School 49 42

District 303 304

Province 1803 1696

Mathématiques

Grade 11


wrote the exam


108

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 129

2007 2008 2009

School 8 10 10


Province 2027 2026 1961

2010 2011

School 7 10

District 297 314

Province 1639 1879

District 11 École Carrefour Beausoleil

Français

Grade 11


wrote the exam


0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 130

2007 2008 2009

School 11 12 10


Province 1999 1874 1956

2010 2011

School 7 10

District 303 304

Province 1803 1696

Mathématiques

Grade 11


wrote the exam

109


0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Tables by subject, level, and school at the high school level

110


Schools

Mathieu-Martin 4 12 189 91 75 65 76 71 98 67 18 9 185 86 70 64 75 67 95 61

L'Odyssée 1 8 130 87 69 63 71 67 96 58 2 2 135 86 71 64 73 68 93 58

Sainte-Anne 0 1 89 96 75 61 76 70 98 72 1 1 83 92 74 62 68 69 98 62

Samuel-de-Champlain 2 3 24 92 77 68 81 73 100 73 1 1 32 100 72 64 78 69 97 74

District 01 7 24 432 91 73 64 75 70 97 65 22 13 435 88 71 64 73 68 95 61Marie-Gaétane 1 0 36 97 73 59 64 67 100 58 3 0 32 91 69 65 69 68 88 59

A.-J.-Savoie 0 0 44 90 65 64 77 65 75 69 1 0 40 98 68 63 73 66 85 69

Grande-Rivière 0 0 19 100 68 62 79 66 95 75 0 0 15 94 69 59 67 65 87 63

Thomas-Albert 3 0 90 95 73 57 59 66 95 53 3 0 86 83 74 57 56 68 91 46

Cité-des-Jeunes 9 4 198 86 77 64 75 72 95 64 7 3 183 85 76 64 73 71 97 61

District 03 13 4 387 90 74 62 71 69 93 62 14 3 356 87 74 62 68 69 93 58Aux quatre vents 2 10 52 96 79 55 50 71 97 44 2 3 60 92 77 61 62 71 98 52

Roland-Pépin 5 5 70 92 71 63 72 68 92 64 7 2 65 89 70 61 63 67 87 51

Secondaire Népisiguit ** 4 15 164 95 76 64 69 71 95 60 0 - - - 77 - - - - -

Final Mark*

% PassFinal Mark

Perfor-mance Index

No. of Absen-

tees

% of Students in This Level

SchoolMark

Prov. Exam Mark

% Pass Exam

No. of Atten-dees

No. of Absen-

tees

No. of Atten-dees


SchoolMark

Prov. Exam Mark

% Pass Exam

Final Mark*

% PassFinal Mark

Perfor-mance Index

No of exemp-

tions

No of exemp-

tions

Français Grade 11 (regular level)2010-2011

Français Grade 11 (regular level)2009-2010

p g

District 05 11 30 286 94 76 62 66 70 95 57 9 12 125 74 76 61 63 72 96 52Louis-Mailloux 6 10 115 93 79 63 67 73 98 58 5 1 113 89 76 61 65 71 97 51

Marie-Esther 2 5 101 88 72 63 73 68 91 62 7 7 109 91 70 65 77 68 96 67

W.-A.-Losier 2 11 136 85 71 60 61 67 86 50 4 0 148 86 74 62 68 69 89 57

Centre La Fontaine 2 1 23 82 71 58 58 66 96 48 1 0 34 87 63 58 56 61 77 45

District 09 12 27 375 88 74 62 66 69 92 55 17 8 404 88 73 62 69 69 92 57Clément-Cormier 4 6 102 92 73 54 46 66 91 42 9 5 105 90 71 54 42 65 89 35

Louis-J.-Robichaud 3 6 86 87 67 61 67 64 84 57 1 2 105 81 69 62 75 66 95 59

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne 0 0 22 96 75 54 50 67 95 46 0 1 5 83 79 62 67 72 100 57

Secondaire Assomption 1 1 20 91 71 59 57 66 95 52 1 2 15 71 70 60 56 66 94 38

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 0 8 53 88 67 56 44 63 82 39 0 5 50 94 66 56 45 62 73 42

Carrefour Beausoleil 0 0 10 100 84 65 90 77 100 90 0 0 7 70 83 62 86 74 100 55

District 11 8 21 293 90 70 57 54 65 88 48 11 15 287 85 70 58 57 65 89 46

Province 51 106 1773 91 73 61 67 69 93 58 73 51 1607 86 73 62 67 69 93 56

* Passing grade: 55 %** Results were not published for exceptional reasons.

111


Schools

Mathieu-Martin 0 8 18 9 63 62 50 62 100 2 11 29 14 64 57 46 62 92

L'Odyssée 1 11 19 13 61 61 43 61 97 1 10 22 14 65 59 41 63 94

Sainte-Anne** 0 1 4 - - - - - - 1 0 7 8 58 52 43 56 71

Samuel-de-Champlain ** 0 1 2 - - - - - - 0 1 0 - - - - - -

District 01 1 21 43 9 62 61 47 62 98 4 22 58 12 64 57 43 62 91Marie-Gaétane ** 0 2 1 - - - - - - 1 1 3 - - - - - -

A.-J.-Savoie ** 0 0 5 - - - - - - 0 0 1 - - - - - -

Grande-Rivière ** 1 0 0 - - - - - - 0 0 1 - - - - - -

Thomas-Albert** 4 0 5 - - - - - - 1 0 17 17 63 52 29 58 88

Cité-des-Jeunes 0 1 31 14 63 57 59 61 97 1 0 32 15 62 58 69 61 97

District 03 5 3 42 10 62 56 53 60 93 3 1 54 13 63 55 53 60 91Aux quatre vents** 0 7 2 - - - - - - 0 6 5 8 62 59 27 61 82

Roland-Pépin 0 4 6 8 61 59 50 62 90 4 3 8 11 67 58 67 64 100

Secondaire Népisiguit 0 21 9 5 59 55 13 58 73 2 6 31 100 66 57 59 63 97

% PassFinal Mark

Prov. Exam Mark

% Pass Exam

Final Mark*

SchoolMark

No. of Absen-

tees

No. of Atten-dees


SchoolMark


Prov. Exam Mark

% Pass Exam

Final Mark*

% PassFinal Mark

No. of Absen-

tees

No. of Atten-dees

No of exemp-

tions

No of exemp-

tions

Français Grade 11 (modified level)2010-2011

Français Grade 11 (modified level)2009-2010

p g

District 05 0 32 17 6 62 57 20 61 82 6 15 44 26 65 57 54 63 95Louis-Mailloux 0 9 9 7 68 62 44 67 100 4 12 14 11 65 57 38 64 96

Marie-Esther 2 2 14 12 57 64 88 60 100 1 4 11 9 55 61 64 57 67

W.-A.-Losier 1 8 24 15 57 57 50 57 71 2 2 24 14 57 52 27 55 56

Centre La Fontaine ** 0 0 5 - - - - - - 0 0 5 - - - - - -

District 09 3 19 52 12 60 60 56 60 86 7 18 54 12 59 55 39 59 72Clément-Cormier 0 2 9 8 62 51 27 59 80 3 8 12 10 60 52 12 59 84

Louis-J.-Robichaud 2 1 13 13 62 58 50 60 100 0 2 25 19 59 53 41 57 85

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne ** 0 1 1 - - - - - - 0 0 1 - - ‐ - - -

Secondaire Assomption ** 0 0 2 - - - - - - 0 0 6 29 61 58 67 60 83

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 0 2 7 12 58 53 33 57 78 0 0 3 - - - - - -

Carrefour Beausoleil ** 0 0 0 - - - - - - 0 1 3 - - - - - -

District 11 2 6 32 10 61 55 37 59 89 3 11 50 15 60 53 34 58 83

Province 4 81 186 9 61 58 44 61 90 23 67 260 14 62 56 44 60 86

* Passing grade: 55 %

112

** The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the restuls for the district and province.


Schools

Mathieu-Martin 2 2 196 84 77 72 83 75 96 68 3 0 204 84 72 68 74 71 91 60

L'Odyssée 1 2 143 90 75 67 76 72 98 67 6 0 146 90 76 64 60 71 95 53

Sainte-Anne 2 0 83 92 80 72 80 77 99 73 2 0 84 93 80 70 77 76 99 70

Samuel-de-Champlain 0 1 27 93 82 76 93 79 100 87 1 0 30 97 83 76 83 80 100 81

District 01 5 5 449 88 77 70 81 75 98 70 12 0 464 88 76 68 70 73 94 61Marie-Gaétane 1 1 33 89 69 57 41 67 76 33 0 0 31 91 78 57 52 69 90 46

A.-J.-Savoie 0 0 38 84 69 55 45 63 82 37 1 1 39 93 77 48 23 66 95 21

Grande-Rivière 0 0 16 84 69 65 81 67 81 68 0 0 13 81 70 61 62 66 92 50

Thomas-Albert 0 0 75 77 73 58 61 67 93 47 2 0 90 87 75 56 43 67 92 36

Cité-des-Jeunes 3 0 186 71 71 67 81 70 89 57 8 1 182 74 74 62 53 70 86 38

District 03 4 1 348 76 71 63 69 68 87 51 11 2 355 80 75 58 47 69 89 37Aux quatre vents 4 7 54 87 79 57 54 71 92 45 6 2 63 81 78 59 45 71 93 35

Roland-Pépin** 3 1 1 - - - - - - - 5 0 88 79 67 59 49 64 81 38

Secondaire Népisiguit 1 7 182 87 76 64 68 71 93 55 4 2 163 76 75 62 56 70 95 42

% PassFinal Mark

Perfor-mance Index

% Pass Exam

No. of Atten-dees

No. of Absen-

tees

Mathématiques Grade 11 (regular level)2010-2011

Mathématiques Grade 11 (regular level)2009-2010

Final Mark*

% PassFinal Mark

Perfor-mance Index

No. of Absen-

tees


SchoolMark

Prov. Exam Mark

% Pass Exam

Final Mark*

No of exemp-

tions

No of exemp-

tions

No. of Atten-dees


SchoolMark

Prov. Exam Mark

p g

District 05 8 15 237 87 76 62 64 71 93 52 15 4 314 78 74 60 52 69 90 40Louis-Mailloux 4 0 111 78 77 70 86 75 94 63 3 1 117 72 76 65 74 72 93 52

Marie-Esther 3 0 102 73 74 66 71 71 95 51 5 0 91 76 78 59 55 71 93 42

W.-A.-Losier 3 2 97 57 70 69 83 70 97 47 8 0 119 64 70 64 62 68 91 36

Centre La Fontaine 2 0 25 89 72 60 56 67 72 50 1 0 33 80 78 56 48 69 97 39

District 09 12 2 335 70 74 68 78 72 94 53 17 1 360 71 75 62 63 70 93 43Clément-Cormier 0 0 103 87 79 65 65 73 97 55 9 0 109 89 74 58 47 68 91 40

Louis-J.-Robichaud 4 1 108 84 74 62 60 70 92 49 4 0 109 77 75 68 69 72 95 52

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne 0 0 18 95 73 69 89 71 94 84 1 0 11 85 73 63 60 69 100 46

Secondaire Assomption 1 0 22 88 75 63 59 72 95 52 0 0 18 95 75 60 56 69 78 50

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 0 0 42 86 72 72 90 72 95 78 2 0 49 80 72 64 67 69 96 54

Carrefour Beausoleil 0 0 10 83 74 76 100 75 100 83 0 0 7 88 82 75 86 79 100 75

District 11 5 1 303 86 76 65 69 72 95 58 16 0 303 83 74 63 60 70 93 48

Province 34 24 1672 81 75 66 73 72 93 57 71 7 1796 80 75 63 59 70 92 46

* Passing grade: 55 %** Results were not published for exceptional reasons.

113


Schools

Mathieu-Martin 2 5 36 16 63 63 68 64 88 6 2 38 16 68 60 60 65 86

L'Odyssée 1 1 16 10 62 61 71 62 100 0 1 17 10 61 59 56 60 83

Sainte-Anne 0 0 7 8 60 67 86 62 100 1 0 6 7 65 55 67 61 100

Samuel-de-Champlain ** 0 0 2 - - - - - - 0 0 1 - - - - - -

District 01 3 6 61 12 63 63 70 63 93 7 3 62 12 66 59 60 63 87Marie-Gaétane ** 0 0 4 - - - - - - 1 0 3 - - - - - -

A.-J.-Savoie ** 0 0 7 - - - - - - 0 0 3 - - - - - -

Grande-Rivière ** 0 0 3 - - - - - - 0 0 3 - - - - - -

Thomas-Albert 0 0 22 23 61 62 82 61 95 3 1 14 13 71 60 53 67 100

Cité-des-Jeunes 1 0 76 29 64 64 83 64 92 6 0 63 26 67 62 73 65 94

District 03 1 0 112 24 61 63 79 62 89 10 1 86 20 67 61 68 65 94Aux quatre vents 1 3 8 13 64 57 36 65 91 0 1 15 19 65 55 38 61 81

Roland-Pépin*** 0 0 0 - - - - - - 1 0 23 21 73 57 57 67 92

Secondaire Népisiguit 0 16 27 13 70 56 40 66 90 1 1 52 24 68 57 53 64 91

% Pass Exam

No of exemp-

tionsSchoolMark

Prov. Exam Mark

% PassFinal Mark

No. of Atten-dees


% Pass Exam

Final Mark*

No. of Absen-

tees

Mathématiques Grade 11 (modified level)2009-2010

Mathématiques Grade 11 (modified level)2010-2011

No of exemp-

tions

No. of Atten-dees


SchoolMark

Prov. Exam Mark

Final Mark*

% PassFinal Mark

No. of Absen-

tees

p g

District 05 1 19 35 13 68 56 39 65 91 2 2 90 22 69 56 51 64 89Louis-Mailloux 1 2 32 22 68 65 76 67 94 3 2 45 28 75 61 70 70 98

Marie-Esther 0 0 37 27 69 60 78 66 95 2 0 29 24 69 57 69 64 86

W.-A.-Losier 2 1 73 43 63 69 88 66 88 11 5 67 36 58 62 69 61 81

Centre La Fontaine ** 0 0 3 - - - - - - 0 0 8 20 65 53 38 60 88

District 09 3 3 145 30 66 66 83 66 91 16 7 149 29 65 60 68 64 88Clément-Cormier 2 0 16 13 70 59 75 67 94 1 0 14 11 61 57 50 60 86

Louis-J.-Robichaud 0 0 20 16 59 52 30 56 70 2 0 32 23 68 57 50 64 84

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne ** 0 0 1 - - - - - - 0 0 2 - - - - - -

Secondaire Assomption ** 0 0 3 - - - - - - 1 0 1 - - - - - -

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 0 0 7 14 56 57 57 57 86 0 0 12 20 61 60 83 61 100

Carrefour Beausoleil ** 0 0 2 - - - - - - 0 0 1 - - - - - -

District 11 2 0 49 14 63 57 57 61 84 4 0 62 17 64 59 60 62 89

Province 10 28 402 19 64 63 72 64 90 39 13 449 20 66 59 62 64 89* Passing grade: 55 %

114

** The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the restuls for the district and province.*** Results were not published for exceptional reasons.


Schools

Mathieu-Martin 8 237 0,0 0,0 0,4 1,3 23,2 57,4 17,7 13 235 0,0 0,9 0,0 2,1 20,4 55,3 21,3

L'Odyssée 5 185 1,1 0,0 0,5 3,2 23,8 51,9 19,5 1 177 0,0 0,0 0,6 5,6 13,6 60,5 19,8

Sainte-Anne 6 97 0,0 0,0 1,0 7,2 14,4 30,9 46,4 4 108 0,0 1,9 0,0 2,8 16,7 38,0 40,7

Samuel-de-Champlain 5 34 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,9 8,8 11,8 76,5 0 49 4,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 6,1 26,5 63,3

District 01 24 553 0,4 0,0 0,5 3,1 21,0 48,1 26,9 18 569 0,4 0,7 0,2 3,2 16,3 51,1 28,1

Marie-Gaétane 3 30 26,7 0,0 10,0 53,3 6,7 3,3 0,0 0 32 0,0 3,1 18,8 59,4 18,8 0,0 0,0

A.-J.-Savoie 0 38 0,0 0,0 2,6 84,2 13,2 0,0 0,0 1 50 0,0 0,0 0,0 32,0 64,0 4,0 0,0

Grande-Rivière 1 22 9,1 0,0 0,0 13,6 59,1 13,6 4,5 0 23 0,0 0,0 0,0 52,2 34,8 13,0 0,0

Thomas-Albert 3 103 0,0 0,0 3,9 12,6 47,6 33,0 2,9 1 91 0,0 0,0 2,2 34,1 44,0 18,7 1,1

Cité-des-Jeunes 6 261 1,5 0,4 13,8 46,4 27,2 10,0 0,8 9 239 0,4 0,0 11,3 53,1 25,1 9,6 0,4

District 03 13 454 3,1 0,2 9,7 40,7 30,8 14,1 1,3 11 435 0,2 0,2 8,0 47,1 33,6 10,3 0,5

Aux quatre vents 1 60 0,0 0,0 6,7 15,0 45,0 30,0 3,3 0 72 0,0 0,0 4,2 27,8 31,9 27,8 8,3

Roland-Pépin 4 97 1,0 2,1 5,2 29,9 41,2 17,5 3,1 2 89 1,1 0,0 0,0 33,7 48,3 14,6 2,2

Secondaire Népisiguit 11 255 0,0 0,8 5,1 25,5 42,7 23,5 2,4 6 246 0,0 0,8 3,3 22,0 46,7 24,4 2,8

District 05 16 412 0,2 1,0 5,3 25,0 42,7 23,1 2,7 8 407 0,2 0,5 2,7 25,6 44,5 22,9 3,7

Louis-Mailloux 3 129 1,6 0,0 11,6 55,0 24,0 6,2 1,6 8 140 0,0 0,0 13,6 62,1 19,3 5,0 0,0

Novice

No. of Atten-dees

ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment Grade 10 (all levels) 2010-2011

ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment Grade 10 (all levels) 2009-2010

No. of Atten-dees

Inter-mediateBasicNoviceUnratable SuperiorAdvancedExemptedExempted

No. of Absen-

tees Superior

No. of Absen-

teesBasic

Inter-mediate AdvancedUnratable

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Marie-Esther 6 114 0,0 0,9 14,9 43,9 29,8 10,5 0,0 4 150 0,0 2,0 22,7 52,7 16,7 6,0 0,0

W.-A.-Losier 4 183 0,5 3,3 12,0 50,3 28,4 5,5 0,0 5 182 0,0 2,2 9,3 53,8 29,1 5,5 0,0

Centre La Fontaine 4 48 0,0 0,0 2,1 10,4 50,0 33,3 4,2 1 37 0,0 0,0 2,7 18,9 48,6 27,0 2,7

District 09 17 474 0,6 1,5 11,6 46,0 29,7 9,7 0,8 18 509 0,0 1,4 13,9 53,2 24,2 7,1 0,2

Clément-Cormier 2 116 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,6 50,0 44,0 3,4 3 127 0,8 0,0 0,0 6,3 55,9 34,6 2,4

Louis-J.-Robichaud 4 182 0,5 0,0 0,0 2,2 37,9 54,9 4,4 4 124 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,8 43,5 46,8 4,8

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne 0 13 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 23,1 76,9 0,0 1 22 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 18,2 81,8 0,0

Secondaire Assomption 0 26 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 26,9 73,1 0,0 2 29 3,4 0,0 0,0 3,4 27,6 58,6 6,9

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 1 60 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 36,7 61,7 1,7 3 83 0,0 0,0 0,0 3,6 48,2 44,6 3,6

Carrefour Beausoleil 0 17 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 11,8 58,8 29,4 0 12 0,0 0,0 0,0 16,7 25,0 33,3 25,0

District 11 7 414 0,2 0,0 0,0 1,7 38,9 54,8 4,3 13 397 0,5 0,0 0,0 5,0 45,3 44,8 4,3

Province 77 2307 0,9 0,5 5,4 23,0 31,8 30,3 8,1 68 2317 0,3 0,6 5,1 26,7 31,2 27,8 8,4

115


116

Chapitre 4 ‐ Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale

Chapter 4

Results of Pan-Canadian and International Assessments

Pan-Canadian (PCAP/SAIP) and International (PISA) Assessment Programs

What are SAIP and PCAP?1

The School Achievement Indicators Program(SAIP) was a cyclical program of pan-Canadian assessments of studentachievement in mathematics, reading andwriting, and science that was conducted bythe Council of Ministers of Education Canada

Why did CMEC develop SAIP and PCAP?

Canadians have long been interested in howwell their education systems are meeting theneeds of students and society. To provideinformation on this issue, the provinces andterritories through CMEC developed SAIP

117

Chapter 4

Results of Pan-Canadian and International Assessments

Pan-Canadian (PCAP/SAIP) and International (PISA) Assessment Programs

What are SAIP and PCAP?1

The School Achievement Indicators Program(SAIP) was a cyclical program of pan-Canadian assessments of studentachievement in mathematics, reading andwriting, and science that was conducted bythe Council of Ministers of Education, Canada(CMEC) between 1993 and 2004. The Pan-Canadian Assessment Program (PCAP) hassince then replaced SAIP. The first PCAPassessment took place in the spring of 2007.PCAP will continue to assess performance inthe same three core subjects as SAIP but willhave room for other subjects to be added asthe need arises.

_______________1 CMEC (2006). The Pan-Canadian AssessmentProgram (PCAP) and the School AchievementIndicators Program (SAIP). Taken on December 11,2006 from http://www.cmec.ca/pcap/indexe.stm .

Why did CMEC develop SAIP and PCAP?

Canadians have long been interested in howwell their education systems are meeting theneeds of students and society. To provideinformation on this issue, the provinces andterritories, through CMEC, developed SAIPand then PCAP to assess the performance ofstudents in mathematics, reading, andscience. Three cycles of pan-Canadianassessments have been conducted since1993. The information revealed in eachassessment, together with the reviewmechanisms of individual jurisdictions, hasgiven ministers of education a basis forexamining their curriculum and other aspectsof their school system.

Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4

Why did CMEC replace SAIP with PCAP?

At its 83rd meeting (held on April 2, 2003, inLondon, Ontario), CMEC approved thedevelopment of PCAP to replace SAIP. Theneed for a new pan-Canadian program thatwould reflect changes made in jurisdictionalcurricula within the past decade had becomeapparent in Canadian provinces andterritories. PCAP also recognizes theincreased jurisdictional emphasis now placedon international assessments. It assessesperformance in reading, science, andmathematics, and will have room for othersubjects as the need arises. PCAP assesses13-year-old students and enables provincesand territories to improve their ownassessments and validate their resultsagainst national and international results.

What is PISA?2

The Program for International Student

The assessment covers three domains:reading, mathematics, and science. Althougheach assessment has questions from all threedomains, the focus shifts with eachassessment. In 2000 and 2009 the focus wason reading, in 2003 on mathematics, and in2006 on science. In 2003, an assessment ofproblem-solving skills was also conducted.

In Canada, the first PISA assessment tookplace in April and May 2000 at the same timeas the Youth in Transition Survey (YITS) foryouth aged 15. The second assessment wasconducted in 2003.

Who participates in PISA?

Although the samples in most countries arebetween 4,000 and 10,000 students, inCanada, over 23,000 students are tested,which allows results to be produced at theprovincial level.

The survey includes a two-hour written test tomeasure students’ knowledge in reading

118

The Program for International StudentAssessment (PISA) is an internationalassessment of the skills and knowledge of15-year-olds. The study is being directed bythe Organization for Economic Co-operationand Development (OECD) and involves over69 countries. As the study will be repeated inother years, it will continue to produce resultsthat can be compared internationally .

_______________2CMEC (2006). The Program for International StudentAssessment (PISA). Taken on December 11, 2006 fromhttp://www.cmec.ca/pisa/indexe.stm .

The survey includes a two-hour written test tomeasure students’ knowledge in reading,mathematics, and science, as well as variousquestionnaires to gather general informationabout the students and their schools.


How are students selected? (PISA)

About 1,000 schools across Canada arerandomly selected to participate in PISA andYITS. In these schools, a random selection ismade of 15-year-old students to determinewho will participate.

How is the information used? (PISA)

Because PISA is an international studyinvolving over 69 countries, it provides aunique examination of the levels ofachievement of 15-year-olds around theworld. It gives a clear indication of thepreparedness of these students as theycontinue in their studies and enter the workforce. It is able to address questions such as :

How well are young adults prepared tomeet the challenges of the future?

Results from PISA are invaluable toeducators, social policy analysts, and humanrights advocacy groups. These researchersand analysts have access to importantinformation that can be used in developingprograms to deal with both short-term andlong-term problems or barriers that youngadults may face in their pursuit of highereducation or in gaining work experience.Information from the survey helps to evaluatethe effectiveness of existing programs andpractices, to determine the most appropriateage at which to introduce new programs, andto better target programs to those most inneed .

Young adults themselves are able to see howtheir own experiences compare with those ofother young adults.

119

meet the challenges of the future?

Are they able to analyze, reasonand communicate their ideaseffectively?

Are some kinds of school policiesand practices more effective thanothers?


Average scores and confidence intervals, by provinceand country, for each PCAP 2010 domain

Mathematics as primary domain

The mathematics component of PCAP 2010 is alinged on the jurisdictions' curricula and onthe National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). Regardless of the terms used todefine mathematics, curricula across Canada are structured to enable students “to usemathematics in his or her personal life, in the workplace, and in further study.

The PCAP mathematics domain is divided into four strands or subdomains asdescribed below:

• numbers and operations (properties, equivalent representations, and magnitude);• geometry and measurement (properties of 2-D figures and 3-D shapes, relative

position, transformations, and measurement);• patterns and relationships (patterns and algebraic expressions, linear relations, and

equations); and• data management and probability (data collection and analysis, experimental and

theoretical probability).

These subdomains in turn involve the five processes listed below:

• problem solving

120

• problem solving• communication• representation• reasoning and proof• connections

Performance descriptors for scores at each level of thegeneral scale

Level 1 scores (357 and below)Students at this level were able to solve problems at a low cognitive level that weredetermined to be fairly easy questions. Typically, at this level, students were able to retrieveinformation from a graph or solve previously learned routine problems. At this level,students could solve problems that required mostly recalland recognition.

Level 2 scores (358 to 513)Students at this level were required to recall facts, definitions, or terms and carry outpreviously learned procedures such as performing one or more operations, employingformulae, evaluating a variable expression, retrieving information from a table or a graphand applying it to solve a problem.


Typically, students at this level were able to identify a simple number of geometric patterns.Students were able to solve problems that were clearly defined as to what was required,with no extraneous information or hidden assumptions. At this level, students could solveproblems that were mostly of low and moderate cognitive demand.

Level 3 scores (514 to 668)Students at this level were able to apply what they know to new situations, identify hiddenassumptions, and distinguish between relevant and irrelevant information needed to solvea problem. They had to select appropriate procedures or strategies to solve a problem andsometimes had to apply skills from different domains to solve problems. Students at thislevel were able to represent a problem in different ways and use informal reasoning to solveproblems. At this level students could solve problems that were mostly of moderate to highcognitive demand.

Level 4 scores (669 and above)Students at this level were able to solve problems that require complex reasoning at theanalysis and synthesis levels. Solutions clearly show a mastery of the appropriateconceptual and procedural knowledge necessary to solve complex problems. Students wereable to generalize a pattern and write the rule algebraically. They were also able to explainor justify their solutions and strategies clearly. At this level, students could solve problemsthat were generally of high cognitive demand and determined to be difficult questions.

Reading assessment

The reading framework statement for PCAP 2010 has not been altered from that used to

121

The reading framework statement for PCAP 2010 has not been altered from that used todefine reading performance in the 2007 assessment in which reading was the majordomain. This enables comparisons over time between the two cohorts. According tocurricula across Canada, reading is a dynamic, interactive process whereby the readerconstructs meaning from texts. The process of reading effectively involves the interaction ofreader, text, purpose, and context before, during, and after reading.

In light of the interactive process linking the reader, text, purpose, and context, thisassessment of the domain of reading considers the reader’s engagement with the text andhis or her response to it. Language arts curricula across Canada identify comprehension,interpretation, and response and reflection as major organizing aspects of reading literacy.In this assessment, three subdomains of the integrated process of reading are assessed:comprehension, interpretation, and response to text (which includes response andreflection).

Comprehension: Students understand the explicit and implicit information provided by the text. In particular, they understand the vocabulary, parts, elements, and events of the text.


Interpretation: Students make meaning by analyzing and synthesizing the parts/elements/events to develop a broader perspective and/or meaning for the text. They may identifytheme/thesis and support that with references to details, events, symbols, patterns, and/or text features.

Response to text: In responding, the readers engage with the text in many ways: bymaking personal connections between aspects of the text and their own real/vicarious/prior experiences, knowledge, values and/or point of view; by responding emotionally tocentral ideas or aspects of the text; and/or by taking an evaluative stance about the qualityor value of the text, possibly in relation to other texts and/or social or cultural factors.

Science assessment

The concept of “scientific literacy” is generally accepted as the overarching goal of sciencecurricula across Canada. The PCAP science assessment is founded on a definition ofscientific literacy that advocates that students’ evolving competencies in applying science-related attitudes, skills, and knowledge, as well as an understanding of the nature ofscience, enable them to conduct inquiries, solve problems, and make evidence-baseddecisions about science-related issues. Embedded in this definition of scientific literacy isthe supposition that students have knowledge of the life sciences, physical sciences(chemistry and physics), and Earth and space sciences, as well as an understanding of thenature of science as a human endeavour.

As reflected in most science curriculum documents across Canadian provinces andterritories, three competencies are associated with demonstrating scientific literacy: science

122

territories, three competencies are associated with demonstrating scientific literacy: scienceinquiry, problem solving, and decision making. Each of these competencies requiresunderstanding the nature of science, applying relevant scientific knowledge, using skillsrequired for scientific and technological inquiry, and demonstrating attitudes as a reflectionof scientific literacy. For the purposes of PCAP 2010, all of these are considered interrelatedand mutually supportive. Additionally, one of the purposes of PCAP as identified by CMECwas to align itself with international assessments such as the Organisation for EconomicCo-operation and Development’s (OECD) Programme for International StudentAssessment. Adopting a similar definition of scientific literacy enhances the possibility offinding some areas of comparability between the two assessments.

Reporting scales for the minor domains

As was the case for reading, one mean scale score for each of the minor domains has beenused for reporting the achievement results. The pan-Canadian mean score was set at 500with a standard deviation of 100.


Chart 131

PCAP (2010) Mathematics

Pan-Canadian Results in Reading by Language

498

500

503

504

504

507

507

507

511

515

516

Saskatchewan (F)

Canada

Nova Scotia (F)

British Columbia (F)

Alberta (F)

Quebec (E)

New Brunswick (F)

Ontario (E)

Ontario (F)

Canada (F)

Quebec (F)

Ranking of jurisdictions on PCAP (2007) MathematicsAssessment

123

460

466

467

468

472

473

474

480

481

495

495

400 425 450 475 500 525 550

Prince Edward Island (E)

New Brunswick (E)

Manitoba (E)

Yukon (E)

Newfoundland and Labrador (E)

Nove Scotia (E)

Saskatchewan (E)

Manitoba (F)

British Columbia (E)

Alberta (E)

Canada (E)

( )

Scores

N.B. Averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.


Chart 132


Distribution (%) of Performance Levels in Reading by Language

9

9

9

10

11

12

12

13

13

14

16

45

47

58

55

50

52

53

56

58

53

50

43

41

31

33

37

34

32

30

29

30

33

3

3

2

2

2

2

3

1

0

3

1

Saskatchewan (F)

Canada (E)

Manitoba (F)

Saskatchewan (E)



Nove Scotia (E)

New Brunswick (E)


Yukon (E)

Manitoba (E)

Percentage of Students by Performance Level on PCAP

124

4

5

6

7

7

8

8

8

9

9

9

9

50

46

43

47

50

38

38

43

42

42

45

45

44

46

46

44

40

50

50

45

45

44

43

43

2

3

5

2

3

4

4

4

4

5

3

3

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Alberta (F)


Ontario (F)

Nova Scotia (F)

Alberta (E)

Canada (F)

Quebec (F)

Ontario (E)

New Brunswick (F)

Quebec (E)

Canada

Saskatchewan (F)

Niveau 1 (%) Niveau 2 (%)Niveau 3 (%) Niveau 4 (%)


Chart 133


518

465

476

499

500

503

504

479

489

496

500

511

513

Canada (F)

New Brunswick (E)

New Brunswick

Canada (E)

Canada

New Brunswick (F)

Canada (F)

New Brunswick (E)

Nouveau-Brunswick

Canada (E)

Canada

Canada (F)

New Brunswick (F)

Pat

tern

s an

d R

elat

ions

hips

Dat

a m

anag

emen

t and

P

roba

bilit

y

Results by Mathematics Subdomain and by Language atPCAP (2010) for Canada and New Brunswick Sectors

125

479

494

500

507

519

520

457

472

494

500

508

400 425 450 475 500 525 550

New Brunswick (E)

Canada (E)

Canada

New Brunswick (F)

Canada (F)

New Brunswick

New Brunswick (E)

New Brunswick

Canada (E)

Canada

New Brunswick (F)

Num

bers

and

Ope

ratio

nsG

eom

atriy

and

M

easu

rem

ent

Scores




Chart 134

477

478

481

486

490

491

499

500

504

508

509

513

523

Saskatchewan (M)

Nova Scotia (F)

Yukon (M)

New Brunswick (F)

British Columbia (M)

Alberta (F)

Canada (F)

Alberta (M)

Canada (M)

Ontario (M)

Ontario (F)

Quebec (F)

Quebec (M)

Results in Mathematics by Gender and Language at PCAP 2010)

126

453

468

468

470

470

471

473

473

475

475

476

400 425 450 475 500 525 550

Prince Edward Island (F)

Prince Edward Island (M)

Manitoba (F)

Yukon (F)

Manitoba (M)

Newfoundland and Labrador (M)

Nova Scotia (M)

New Brunswick (M)

Saskatchewan (F)


Newfoundland and Labrador (F)

Scores



Chart 135

PCAP (2010) Reading

482

486

486

489

490

492

492

499

500

506

507

517


New Brunswick (E)


Nove Scotia (E)

Alberta (F)

Quebec (E)

Saskatchewan (E)


Canada

Alberta (E)

Canada (E)

Ontario (E)

Results in Reading on PCAP (2010) by Jurisdiction andLanguage

127

464

464

468

468

473

475

478

480

480

481

400 425 450 475 500 525 550

New Brunswick (F)

Yukon (E)

Saskatchewan (F)

Manitoba (F)


Nova Scotia (F)

Manitoba (E)

Canada (F)

Quebec (F)

Ontario (F)

Scores



PCAP (2010) Sciences

Chart 136

489

490

493

496

497

497

500

501

504

506

510

515

Nove Scotia (E)

Quebec (E)




Ontario (F)

Canada

Nova Scotia (F)

Canada (E)

Alberta (F)

Ontario (E)

Alberta (E)

Results in Sciences on PCAP (2010) by Jurisdiction andLanguage

128

478

482

482

486

486

486

487

487

488

489

400 425 450 475 500 525

Yukon (E)

New Brunswick (F)

Manitoba (F)

Saskatchewan (F)

Manitoba (E)

Quebec (F)


Canada (F)

Saskatchewan (E)

New Brunswick (E)

Scores



Average scores and confidence intervals, by province and country, for each PISA domain (2000 to 2009)

129


PISA 2000Reading

The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100.

Chart 137 Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: READING

507

516

517

517

521

522

523

525

527

528

529

529

529

533

534

536

538

546

550

AustriaSweden

Newfoundland and Lab.Prince Edward Island

Nova ScotiaJapan

United KingdomKorea

IrelandAustralia

New ZealandSaskatchewan

ManitobaOntario

CANADAQuebec

British ColumbiaFinlandAlberta

Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2000 reading assessment

N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.

130

396

422

441

458

462

470

474

479

480

483

484

487

492

493

494

497

500

501

504

505

505

507

507

507

375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

BrazilMexico

LuxembourgLatvia

Russian FederationPortugalGreecePoland

HungaryLichtenstein

GemanyItaly

Czech RepublicSpain

SwitzerlandDenmark

OECD AverageNew BrunswickUnited States

FranceNorwayIceland

BelgiumAustria

Scores


PISA 2000Mathematics


Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country : MATHEMATICS

Chart 138

514

514

515

517

520

524

525

529

529

533

533

533

534

536

537

547

547

550

557

IcelandDenmark

AustriaFrance

BelgiumOntario

SaskatchewanUnited Kingdom

SwitzerlandCANADAManitobaAustralia

British ColumbiaFinland

New ZealandKorea

AlbertaQuebec

Japan


Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2000 mathematics assessment

131

334

387

446

447

454

457

463

470

476

478

488

490

493

498

499

500

503

506

509

510

512

513

514

514

300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

BrazilMexico

LuxembourgGreece

PortugalItaly

LatviaPolandSpain

Russian FederationHungary

GermanyUnited States

Czech RepublicNorway

OECD AverageIreland

New BrunswickNewfoundland and Lab.

SwedenPrince Edward Island

Nova ScotiaLichtenstein

Iceland

Scores



Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country : SCIENCE

Chart 139

PISA 2000Science

511

512

513

516

516

519

522

522

527

528

528

529

532

533

538

541

546

550

552

Czech RepublicSwedenIreland

Nova ScotiaNewfoundland and Lab.

AustriaSaskatchewan

OntarioManitobaAustralia

New ZealandCANADA

United KingdomBritish Columbia

FinlandQuebecAlbertaJapanKorea


Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2000 science assessment

132

375

422

443

459

460

460

461

476

478

481

483

487

491

496

496

496

496

497

499

500

500

500

508

511

350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

BrazilMexico

LuxembourgPortugal

LatviaRussian Federation

GreeceLichtenstein

ItalyDenmark

PolandGermany

SpainSwitzerland

BelgiumIceland

HungaryNew Brunswick

United StatesOECD Average

NorwayFrance

Prince Edward IslandCzech Republic

Scores


Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: READING

PISA 2003Reading

Chart 140

499500500503507510512513513514515520521522525525525528530534535543543

SwitzerlandOECD Average

NorwayNew Brunswick

BelgiumHong Kong-China

SaskatchewanNetherlandsNova Scotia

SwedenIreland

ManitobaNewfoundland and Lab.

New ZealandLichtenstein

AustraliaQuebec

CANADAOntario

KoreaBritish Columbia

AlbertaFinland

N.B. Differences in scores ares statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.


133

375

382400403

412420

434441442

469472476478479481482489491491491492492495495496497498498499

350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

TunisiaIndonesia

MexicoBrazil

Serbia and MontenegroThailandUruguay

TurkeyRussian Federation

SlovakiaGreece

ItalyPortugal

LuxembourgSpain

HungaryCzech Republic

LatviaAustria

GermanyIceland

DenmarkPrince Edward Island

United StatesFrancePoland

Macao-ChinaJapan

Switzerland

Scores



Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country : MATHEMATICS


Chart 141

515515516516517523524527527528529530532534536537538538542544549550

IcelandNova Scotia

Czech RepublicSaskatchewan

Newfoundland and Lab.New Zealand

AustraliaSwitzerland

Macao-ChinaManitobaBelgiumOntario

CANADAJapan

LichtensteinQuebec

NetherlandsBritish Columbia

KoreaFinlandAlberta

Hong Kong-China



134

356

359360

385417422423

437445

466466468

483483485490490493495498500500503503506509511512514

325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

BrazilTunisia

IndonesiaMexico

ThailandUruguay

TurkeySerbia and Montenegro

GreeceItaly

PortugalRussian Federation

United StatesLatviaSpain

HungaryPoland

LuxembourgNorway

SlovakiaOECD Average

Prince Edward IslandIreland

GermanyAustria

SwedenFrance

New BrunswickDenmark

Scores


PISA 2003Sciences

Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: SCIENCE

Chart 142

505506506509511512513514515519520521523524525525525527

538539539

548548

Nova ScotiaSaskatchewan

SwedenBelgiumFrance

ManitobaSwitzerland

Newfoundland and Lab.Ontario

CANADAQuebec

New ZealandCzech Republic

NetherlandsMacao-China

AustraliaLichtenstein

British ColumbiaCorée

AlbertaHong Kong-China

JapanFinland

Scores moyens et intervalles de confiance par provincecanadienne et par pays au volet sciences à l'épreuve duAverage scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2003 science assessment


135

385

390395

405429434436438

468475481483484486487489489489491491494495495498498502503505505

350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

TunisiaBrazil

IndonesiaMexico

ThailandTurkey

Serbia and MontenegroUruguayPortugal

DenmarkGreece

LuxembourgNorway

ItalySpain

Prince Edward IslandLatvia

Russian FederationAustria

United StatesOECD Average

IcelandSlovakia

New BrunswickPoland

GermanyHungary

IrelandNova Scotia

Scores



PISA 2006Reading


508

510

513

514

516

517

521

522

527

528

534

535

536

547

556

Poland

Lichtenstein

Australia

Newfoundland and …

Manitoba

Ireland

New Zealand

Quebec

Canada

British Columbia

Ontario

Alberta

China-Hong Kong

Finland

Korea

Scores moyens et intervalles de confiance par provincecanadienne et par pays au volet lecture à l'épreuve du PISA2006



136

488

490

491

492

494

494

495

495

496

497

497

498

499

501

501

505

507

507

507

275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

France

Austria

OECD Average

China-Macao

Slovenia

Denmark

United Kingdom

Germany

Chinese Taipei

Prince Edward Island

New Brunswick

Japan

Switzerland

Estonia

Belgium

Nova Scotia

Sweden

Saskatchewan

Netherlands

Scores


PISA 2006Reading

Continued from Chart 144

Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: READING (continued)

447

460

461

466

469

470

472

477

479

479

482

483

484

484

Turkey

Greece

Spain

Slovakia

Italy

Lithuania

Portugal

Croatia

Luxemburg

Latvia

Hungary

Czech Republic

Norway

Iceland




137

285

312

353

374

380

385

392

393

393

396

401

401

402

410

413

417

439

440

442

275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

Kyrgyzstan

Qatar

Azerbaijan

Argentina

Tunisia

Colombia

Montenegro

Indonesia

Brazil

Romania

Serbia

Jordan

Bulgaria

Mexico

Uruguay

Thailand

Israel

Russian Federation

Chile

Scores



Chart 145 Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country : MATHEMATICS

522

523

523

525

525

526

527

530

530

531

540

547

547

548

549

New Zealand

Japan

British Columbia

Lichtenstein

China-Macao

Ontario

Canada

Switzerland

Alberta

Netherlands

Quebec

Korea

China-Hong Kong

Finland

Chinese Taipei

Scores moyens et intervalles de confiance par provincecanadienne et par pays au volet mathématiques à l'épreuvedu PISA 2006



138

496

498

501

501

502

504

504

505

506

506

506

507

507

510

513

515

520

520

521

275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

France

OECD Average


Ireland

Sweden

Slovenia

Germany

Austria

Nova Scotia

New Brunswick

Iceland

Saskatchewan


Czech Republic

Denmark

Estonia

Australia

Belgium

Manitoba

Scores




Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: MATHEMATICS (continued)

462

466

467

474

476

476

480

486

486

490

490

491

492

495

495

Italy

Portugal

Croatia

United States

Russian Federation

Azerbaijan

Spain

Lithuania

Latvia

Norway

Luxemburg

Hongrie

Slovakia

United Kingdom

Poland



139

311

318

365

370

370

381

384

391

399

406

411

413

415

417

424

427

435

442

459

275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

Kyrgyzistan

Qatar

Tunisia

Colombia

Brazil

Argentina

Jordan

Indonesia

Montenegro

Mexico

Chile

Bulgaria

Romania

Thailand

Turkey

Uruguay

Serbia

Israel

Greece

Scores


PISA 2006Science

Chart 146

The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100

Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: SCIENCE

522

523

525

526

527

530

531

531

531

532

534

537

539

542

550

563

Korea

Manitoba

Netherlands


Australia

New Zealand

Quebec

Japan

Estonia

Chinese Taipei

Canada

Ontario

British Columbia

China-Hong Kong

Alberta

Finland

Scores moyens et intervalles de confiance par provincecanadienne et par pays au volet science à l'épreuve du PISA2006



140

495

496

498

500

503

504

506

508

509

510

511

511

512

513

515

516

517

519

520

522

300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

France

Denmark

Poland

OECD Average

Sweden

Hongrie

New Brunswick

Ireland


Belgium

China-Macao

Austria

Switzerland

Czech Republic

United Kingdom

Germany

Saskatchewan

Slovenia

Nova Scotia

Lichtenstein

Scores


PISA 2006Science



Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: SCIENCE (continued)

454

473

474

475

479

486

487

488

488

488

489

490

491

493

Israel

Greece

Portugal

Italy

Russian Federation

Luxemburg

Norway

Spain

Slovakia

Lithuania

United States

Latvia

Iceland

Croatia

Scores moyens et intervalles de confiance par provincecanadienne et par pays au volet sciences à l'épreuve duPISA 2006


N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant if their confidence levels do not overlap.

141

322

349

382

386

388

390

391

393

410

412

418

421

422

424

428

434

436

438

300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

Kyrgyzistan

Qatar

Azerbaijan

Tunisia

Colombia

Brazil

Argentina

Indonesia

Mexico

Montenegro

Romania

Thailand

Jordan

Turkey

Uruguay

Bulgaria

Serbia

Chile

Scores


PISA 2009Reading



506

506

508

515

516

520

521

522

524

525

526

531

533

533

536

539

556

Newfoundland and Labrador

Belgium

Netherlands

Australia

Nova Scotia

Japan

New Zealand

Quebec

Canada

British Columbia

Singapore

Ontario

Alberta

China-Hong Kong

Finland

Korea

Shanghai (China)



142

487

489

494

494

495

495

495

496

496

497

497

499

499

500

500

500

501

501

503

504

506

300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

China-Macao

Portugal

Hongrie

United Kingdom

Manitoba

Chinese Taipei

Denmark

France

Ireland

Sweden

Germany

Lichtenstein

New Brunswick

United States

Poland

Iceland

Estonia

Switzerland

Norway

Saskatchewan


Scores



PISA 2009Reading

Continued from Chart Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and

Country: READING (continued)

459

459

464

468

470

472

474

476

477

478

481

483

483

484

486

486

Russian Federation

Dubai

Turkey

Lithuania

Austria

Luxemburg

Israel

Croatia

Slovakia

Czech Republic

Spain

Greece

Slovenia

Latvia


Italy




143

314

362

370

371

372

385

390

398

402

404

405

408

412

413

416

421

424

425

426

429

442

449

300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

Kyrgyzstan

Azerbaijan

Peru

Panama

Qatar

Albania

Kazakhstan

Argentina

Indonesia

Tunisia

Jordan

Montenegro

Brazil

Colombia

Trinidad and Tobago

Thailand

Romania

Mexico

Uruguay

Bulgaria

Serbia

Chile

Scores


PISA 2009 Mathematics

Chart 148 Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: MATHEMATICS


519

523

525

526

526

527

529

529

534

536

541

543

543

546

555

562

600

Ne Zealand

British Columbia

China-Macao

Netherlands

Ontario

Canada

Alberta

Japan

Switzerland

Lichtenstein

Finland

Quebec

Chinese Taipei

Korea

China-Hong Kong

Singapore

Shanghai (China)



144

492

493

494

495

496

497

497

498

501

501

503

503

504

506

507

512

512

513

514

515

519

275 350 425 500 575

United Kingdom

Czech Republic

Sweden

Poland

Austria

France

Slovakia

Norway

Manitoba

Slovenia


Denmark

New Brunswick

Saskatchewan

Iceland

Estonia

Nova Scotia

Germany

Australia

Belgium

New Zealand

Scores


PISA 2009 Mathematics


Country: MATHEMATICS (continued)


442

445

447

453

460

466

468

477

482

483

483

487

487

487

487

489

490

Serbia

Turkey

Israel

Dubai

Croatia

Greece

Russian Federation

Lithuania

Latvia

Spain

Italy

United States

Portugal

Ireland


Luxemburg

Hongrie



145

331

360

365

368

371

371

377

381

386

387

388

403

405

414

419

419

421

427

427

428

431

275 350 425 500 575

Kyrgyzstan

Panama

Peru

Qatar

Indonesia

Tunisia

Albania

Colombia

Brazil

Jordan

Argentina

Montenegro

Kazakhstan

Trinidad and Tobago

Thailand

Mexico

Chile

Romania

Uruguay

Bulgaria

Azerbaijan

Scores



PISA 2009Sciences

Chart 149 Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: SCIENCES

520

522

523

524

527

528

529

531

532

535

538

539

542

545

549

554

575

Chinese Taipei

Netherlands

Nova Scotia

Quebec

Australia

Estonia

Canada

Ontario

New Zealand

British Columbia

Korea

Japan

Singapore

Alberta

China-Hong Kong

Finland

Shanghai (China)


Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2009 sciences assessment

146

496

498

499

500

500

501

502

503

506

507

508

508

511

512

513

514

517

518

520

520

520

300 350 400 450 500 550 600

Iceland

France

Denmark

Czech Republic

Norway

New Brunswick

United States

Hongrie

Manitoba

Belgium

Ireland

Poland

China-Macao

Slovenia

Saskatchewan

United Kingdom

Switzerland


Lichtenstein

Germany

Chinese Taipei

Scores


PISA 2009Sciences


Country: SCIENCES (continued)


447

454

455

466

470

478

484

486

488

489

490

491

493

494

494

495

495

Chile

Turkey

Israel

Dubai

Greece

Russian Federation

Luxemburg

Croatia

Spain

Italy

Slovakia

Lithuania

Portugal

Austria

Latvia

Sweden



Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2009 sciences assessment

147

330

369

373

376

379

383

391

400

401

401

401

402

405

410

415

416

425

427

428

439

443

300 350 400 450 500 550 600

Kyrgyzstan

Peru

Azerbaijan

Panama

Qatar

Indonesia

Albania

Kazakhstan

Argentina

Tunisia

Montenegro

Colombia

Brazil

Trinidad and Tobago

Jordan

Mexico

Thailand

Uruguay

Romania

Bulgaria

Serbia

Scores


148

Conclusion

Conclusion

This marks the seventeenth year of publication of New Brunswick’s provincial examination results by school and district. The Department of Education releases these results to meet the requirements of accountability and transparency.

The production of this report is the outcome of a lengthy process of preparation and then compilation of the data gathered from the provincial examinations administered in the 2010-2011 school year. This year, an effort was made to reduce the size of the report while maintaining the level of information presented. The Department chose the most relevant data so as to produce a report accessible to everyone.

These results show all education partners and decision makers how New Brunswick students are doing in the subjects that make up the compulsory portion of the curriculum .

149

Conclusion

This marks the seventeenth year of publication of New Brunswick’s provincial examination results by school and district. The Department of Education releases these results to meet the requirements of accountability and transparency.

The production of this report is the outcome of a lengthy process of preparation and then compilation of the data gathered from the provincial examinations administered in the 2010-2011 school year. This year, an effort was made to reduce the size of the report while maintaining the level of information presented. The Department chose the most relevant data so as to produce a report accessible to everyone.

These results show all education partners and decision makers how New Brunswick students are doing in the subjects that make up the compulsory portion of the curriculum .

We would appreciate receiving your comments by mail or e-mail once you have read this report. Please send them to the addresses indicated at the beginning. The Department will examine your questionnaire responses and comments with great care.

Note, too, that school principals and district superintendents, as well as appropriate departmental staff, are available to answer any further questions you may have.

Provincial Examination Results - New Brunswick · 2018. 9. 1. · Chapter 1 ‐ Provincial...

Documents

Transcript of Provincial Examination Results - New Brunswick · 2018. 9. 1. · Chapter 1 ‐ Provincial...