Stadium Recommendation Presentation

download Stadium Recommendation Presentation

of 9

Transcript of Stadium Recommendation Presentation

  • 8/10/2019 Stadium Recommendation Presentation

    1/9

    Stadium Recommendationto the Board of Governors

    of the CSU System

    December 5, 2014

  • 8/10/2019 Stadium Recommendation Presentation

    2/9

    Process February - August 2012: Stadium Advisory Committee

    Amy Parsons, VP for University Operations

    Tim Romani, CEO, ICON

    Martin Carcasson, Director, Center for Public Deliberation

    October 2012: Initial Recommendation and BOG Action

    March - September, 2014: Community Design Development Advisory Committee

    Bob McCluskey, Chair

    October 2014: Second Recommendation and BOG Action

    November 2014 Kevin Unger, Community Leadership Committee

    Drs. Katherine Leigh and Susan LaRue, Campus Leadership Committee

    Department of Athletics and CSU Facilities

    Overview of Public Process

    Tom Milligan, VP for External Relations

  • 8/10/2019 Stadium Recommendation Presentation

    3/9

    Assumptions Football will continue to be played as a collegiate sport and will remain popular with a w

    segment of the population.

    In Colorado and at Colorado State, as elsewhere, there is abundant interest in attendingsporting events, obviously with a competitive product deriving more interest and attenda

    Colorado State University is an exceptional comprehensive, student-centered researchuniversity, yet the brand of the university is not as broadly understood as we might wish

    Intercollegiate athletics, despite the obvious flaws and challenges we face in our day, adto the life of the campus, the life of the community and whether we might think appropexcessive or not draw a great deal of attention to a university.

    Intercollegiate athletics, despite the large sums of money and costs associated with the

    worthy of some rational investment. At Colorado State, our net investment is extraordinaand I believe the return on reasonable additional investments will be very high.

    Improvements in intercollegiate athletics do not have to come at the expense of academeither fiscally or in focus. Our budgets, investments and priorities have been and will remunambiguously focused on our academic mission.

    There is no substitute for expecting excellence in everything we do as a university.

  • 8/10/2019 Stadium Recommendation Presentation

    4/9

    Risk Analysis General Fund

    No Impact

    Option #1 10 years - $30M - $60M bond cost - General Fund

    Options #2 and #4

    Option #3 50% philanthropy and 50% revenue bonds

    Most Recent Analysis

    CSL Study is a key element

  • 8/10/2019 Stadium Recommendation Presentation

    5/9

    CSL Survey methodology

    95% confidence interval and 1.2% margin of error

    National comparisons Historical CSU data

    Weighting of various inputs based on their professional methodology (grounded in experience)

    Track record

    Low, base, high, and hybrid cases

    Attendance Projected at 27,000 per game

    9% increase over 10-year mean (survey = 22%)

    Average attendance in winning seasons since 1994: 29,900

    Product New mix

    Doubling of club and loge boxes; 15% increase in suite seats; 27% increase in capacity

    Projected at 75% sold

    Pricing Within existing range with premium and priority seating donations

    ECA methodology review

  • 8/10/2019 Stadium Recommendation Presentation

    6/9

    Annual Total

    General Fund Budget: $

    Annual Total Debt GeneraDebt Service Payments:

    Annual Total CSU Budget: $952M Annual Total Debt Service

    Payments: $34.6M

    Annual New Faculty Hires:79

    Annual Faculty Start-ups: $16M

    Annual Incremental E

    Budget Change:$31.

    Annual Incremental AcaQuality Investments: $6

    All figures are for FY2013-14

  • 8/10/2019 Stadium Recommendation Presentation

    7/9

  • 8/10/2019 Stadium Recommendation Presentation

    8/9

    Conclusion

    I believe we can attain a CSU-owned and -operated facility with

    minimal changes to the full scope of the original design that mee

    the fiscal standard weve established: the lowest risk of any neg

    impact on the general fund.

    In fact, I believe it is likely that there will be no impact on the gen

    fund, and I believe that the minimal level of risk that remains is m

    than adequately buffered by non-general fund sources.

    Such a facility is, in my opinion, in the best long-term interests o

    Colorado State University.

  • 8/10/2019 Stadium Recommendation Presentation

    9/9

    Recommendation

    Approve the construction of a new multi-use stadium located on

    Colorado State Universitys main campus.

    Authorize me to return to the Board with both a final program plan

    a plan of finance in accord with State and Board policies.

    Authorize me to select a scope of plan and financing option that m

    the standard of minimizing the risk of any negative impact to the

    general fund.