3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseñanza
-
Upload
juan-carlos-guillen-ramirez -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
0
Transcript of 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseñanza
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
1/34
TEACHING STRATEGIES ASINSTRUMENTS OF
SEMIOTIC MEDIATION
Nstor Daniel Roselli
IRICE (CONICET) ARGENTINA
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
2/34
TEACHING IN A CONCEPTUAL VIEW
Is communicative interaction(a social activity mediated by lingistic
signs)
addressed to take notice of the symbolic social system calledculture (included the scientific knowledge)
(curriculum)
LEARNING(internalization in conscience as mental activity)
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
3/34
Through a present exchange of communicative activity(negociation or social construction of meanings)
it is possible to incorporate in conscience
the symbolic social construction of the human history
This learning process needs a teaching external source
but then it is necessary the transfer of the controlof the activity to the own learner
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
4/34
Teaching in a concrete view(as a social practice)
is a complex activity that involves
Social system
Physical system External symbolic systems
orallanguage
writtenlanguage
numeralsystem
system of graphicrepresentation
scientificvocabulary
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
5/34
Teaching strategies
They are cultural instruments by
themselves
refer not only to different ways to learn culture
They have a semiotic effect on learningand the mental construction of knowledge
Each strategy involves a different conceptionand practice of teaching, and different learning results
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
6/34
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
7/34
RESEARCH RESULTS
In this research we compare these three teaching styles. Groups of 5or 6 students from the first year of secondary school (13 years old)received teaching sessions (70`) following this quasi-experimentaldesign pre-test / post-test:
Expositive condition: 2 teachers, 2 classes each one.Participative condition: 2 teachers, 2 classes each one.Collaborative condition: 2 teachers, 2 classes each one.
The theme taught was a biological one: Birds. Pre and Post-test: open questionaire and a personal conversation aboutthem.
Procedure instruction: It was very general, to allow the teacher to usethis personal criteria. Aims:
a) To analyse non-explicit (hidden) aspects of teaching processb) To analyse learning results in many ways (qualitative andquantitative effects).
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
8/34
TEACHING PROCESS
EXPOSITIVE PARTICIPATIVETEACHER
CONSTANCY INTRAINDIVIDUAL(fixed pattern)
VARIABILITY INTRAINDIVIDUAL(variable course)
Strong knowledge systematization Weak knowledge systematization
More dependence on the text (onlythemes coming from the text)
Less dependence on the text (manyemergent themes)
Based on oral discourse (less use ofexternal symbolic systems)
Based on oral discourse and the useof external symbolic systems
Restricted use of the space Free use of the space
Less use of gestures, mimics andhand movements
More use of gestures, mimics andhand movements
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
9/34
TEACHING PROCESS
EXPOSITIVE PARTICIPATIVE
LEARNERShort participation High participation
Induced participation Induced and spontaneousparticipation
Participation: specially withquestions
Participation: questions, answersand affirmations
More quiter environment More noisier and relaxedenvironment
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
10/34
LEARNING
EXPOSITIVE PARTICIPATIVELEARNER
Learning focused on the specifictopics that had been taught
More extended learning, includingconnected topics (emergent
knowledge)More interindividual heterogeneity More interindividual homogeneity
More dependence on teacher More independence from teacher
Less permanence on time of learnedknowledge More permanence on time of learnedknowledgeMore independent of the peer
interindividual supportMore dependent of the peer
interindividual support
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
11/34
TEACHINGTEACHER
1. CONSTANCY / VARIABILITY INTRAINDIVIDUAL(fixed pattern / variable course)
1.1 Sequence of the general development (big topics)
Expositive Participative
Class 1 Class 2 Class 1 Class 2
Nancy ABCDE ABCDE Carlos ABCDE ABCDE
Ana ABCDE ABCDE Ins ABCDE ABCDE
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
12/34
1.2. SEQUENCE OF SPECIFIC TOPICS
1.2.1. FEATHERS (A, B, C)
Nancy(expositive)
Class1
Class2
A A
B BC C
Carlos(participative)
Class1
Class2
A A
C BB C
Ana(expositive)
Class1
Class2
A AB BC C
Ins(participative)
Class1
Class2
A AB CC B
3
3
5
5
Scale: from 3 to 6.
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
13/34
1.2.2. PHYSICAL EXPLANATION OF THE FLIGHT (A, B, C, D, E, F, G)
Nancy(exp)
Class 1 Class 2
A AB BC CD DE EF FG G
Carlos(part)
Class 1 Class 2
A AC BB CE D-- EG FD G
Ana(exp)
Class 1 Class 2
A A
B CC BD DE EF F
G G
Ins(part)
Class 1 Class 2
-- A
B CC BD DE EG F
F GScale: from 7 to 14
7 13
9 12
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
14/34
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
15/34
2.2 Number of parcial synthesis in Feathers
NANCY Class 1: 0(expositive)
ANA Class 1: 0(expositive)
CARLOS Class 1: 3(participative)
Aa Ba Ca Ac Ab Bc Bb Cc Cb Ad Bd Cd
INS Class 1: 3(participative)
Aa Ab Ac AdBa Bb Bc BdCa Cb Cc Cd
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
16/34
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
17/34
3.3 Dependence in the mention of minor themes: Topic Bb
Concepts N c. 1 A c. 1 C c. 1 I c. 1
No vuelo en elvaco X X X X
Estados de lamateria
X X X X
Agua: lquido Aire: gas
(ambos sonmateria)
X X X X
Formados pormolculas
X X
Tienen peso yvolumen
X
Son fluidos(estructura msflexible)
X X X
Ave: slido eninteraccin conmateria gaseosa
X X X X
6 7 5 4
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
18/34
Analoga ave-avin en la explicacin fsica del vuelo.
Referencia a la explicacin del vuelo de un globo aerosttico.
Referencia explcita a la ley de gravitacin universal.
Otras funciones de las plumas, cortejo sexual, ahuyentar aotras aves, defensa.
Diferencias funcionales entre las alas y las extremidadessuperiores de los humanos.
Otros ejemplos de adaptacin morfolgica al medio en lasaves y en otras especies.
Otros ejemplos de adaptacin dinmica al medio en las avesy en otras especies.
EMERGENT THEMES FROM
THE P RTICIP TIVE CL SSES
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
19/34
3.4 Linguistic dependence
Text (Topic Bb) N c. 1 A c. 1 C c. 1 I c. 1
El ave no es un cuerpo material que vuelaen el vaco
X X X X
La materia puede tener 3 estados X X X X
El aire es un gas X X X X
Est formado por molculas X X
Tiene peso y volumen X X
Impresiona nuestros sentidos X
Los lquidos y los gases son fluidos XTiene estructura ms flexible, ms libre einforme
X X X
Interrelacin entre un cuerpo slido y uncuerpo gaseoso que lo rodea
X X X X
7 9 5 4
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
20/34
Nancy Class 1 Ana Class 1 Carlos Class 1 Ins Class 1
A B C D E A B C D E A B C D E A B C D E
Oral discourse X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Embalmed Bird X X X X X X X
Picture whith manyBirds
X X X X X X X X X X X
Blackboard
Sketchestaken from
the text
X X X X
Own sketches X X
Key-wordsanddefinitions
X X X X X X X X X X X
Summarytables/
ConceptualMaps
X X X X X X
Students Notebooks orfolders (Dictation orguided formulation)
X X X X X X X X X X X X
Other Materials X
4. USE OF EXTERNAL SYMBOLIC SYSTEMS
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
21/34
5. Use of the space
Nancyclass 1
Insclass 1
Anaclass 1
Carlosclass 1
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
22/34
6. At present, we are analizing theuse of the body in teaching:
Gestures and mimics.
Hand movements
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
23/34
LEARNERLearner participation
Induced SpontaneousQuestion Answer Affirmation Question Answer Affirmation
Nancy Class 1(expositive)
8 3 7 3 0 2
Ana Class 1(expositive)
12 4 6 5 1 1
Carlos Class 1
(partipative)
7 38 16 21 9 13
Ins Class 1(participative)
10 42 19 22 11 16
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
24/34
ENVIRONMENT
Exposi t ive : more much quiterenvironment, without movement.
Part icipat ive: A much noisier and relaxedenvironment, with movement.
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
25/34
Mean, SD, Median and Range of post-test in the specific taught topics .
Mean SD Median RangE N
Expositive 30,33 5,04 29,00 17 9 Participative 30,71 4,73 32,50 13 14
Collaborative 30,09 3,11 30,00 12 11
Note: Scale from 10 to 40
LEARNING LEARNER
1. Learning of specific topics (Taught topics)
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
26/34
2. LEARNING OF NON-SPECIFIC TOPICS (CONNECTEDTOPICS)
Preguntas de asociacin y transferencia(temas no enseados especficamente)
1- Por qu hay que remar en un sentido para avanzar en elotro sentido?2- Qu ocurre si ests parado y te pasa un tren o un camina gran velocidad muy cerca, casi rozndote?Por qu?3- Ejemplos de adaptacin morfolgica (que no sean los
tratados en clase)4- Ejemplos de adaptacin dinmica o comportamental (queno sean los tratados en clase)5- Qu tienen en comn y en qu se diferencian los seresvivos de los objetos?
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
27/34
2. Learning of non-specifictopics (connected topics)
Mean and SD of post-test in non-specificquestions.
Mean SD NExpositive 7,5 1,8 9
Participative 12,2 3,3 14
Collaborative 8,1 2,1 11
Note: Scale from 5 to 20. T test p < 0.01.
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
28/34
3. HOMOGENEITY / HETEROGENEITY OFLEARNING RESULTS IN SPECIFIC TAUGHT TOPICS.
Distance pre-test / post-test in the specific taught topics.
I II III IV Total
Expositive 2 2 4 1 9 (22,22) (22,22) (44,44) (11,11) (100%)
Participative 1 9 3 1 14 (7,14) (64,29) (21,43) (7,14) (100%)
Collaborative 0 4 5 2 11 (0) (36,36) (45,45) (18,18) (100%)
Note: I: more distance, more progress.IV: less distance, less progress
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
29/34
4. Dependence on the teacher4.1 Rememoration of sequence of thematic development
Mean SD N
Expositive
(Nancy and Ana, Class1)
6.16 0.98 9
Participative(Carlos and
Ins, Class1)
8.01 0.82 14
Note : Scale from 5 to 10. T test: p < 0.05 5: more coincidence10: more non-coincidence
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
30/34
4. 2 . Lingistic dependence on the teacherExpositive (Nancy and Ana,
Class 1)Participative (Carlosand Ins, Class 1)
El ave no es un cuerpo material que vuela en elvaco
7 9
La materia puede tener tres estados 8 12
El aire es un gas 9 11
Interrelacin entre un cuerpo slido y un cuerpogaseoso
8 8
Proportion: 0.88 0.71
expositive participative
Coincidence 32 40
Non-coincidence 4 16
total 36 56
Chi square: p < 0.05
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
31/34
5. Permanence of learning of specific topics (taughttopics). One month later
Mean SD Median Range NExpositive 25,00 4,26 25,00 14 9 Participative 26,80 5,99 27,00 18 10 Collaborative 20,22 1,98 20,00 6 9
Note: Scale from 10 to 40Mann-Whitney test: expositive / participative p=0.014
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
32/34
6. Recovery of specific learning throughthe peer interindividual support
One month laterMean SD N
Expositive 26.60 4.33 9
Participative 29.48 4.02 10
Mann Whitney: p < 0.05.
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
33/34
Learner Learner
ParticipativeTeacher Teacher
Expositive
Specific cognitive field
Amplificatedcognitivefield
Specificcognitivefield
-
8/13/2019 3.1 Efectos cognitivos ocultos de dos estilos contrapuestos de enseanza
34/34
Cuadro sinptico de los conceptos enseados