COLLES' FRACTURE
Transcript of COLLES' FRACTURE
1365
10. Andersson, M., Walker, A. R. P., Lutz, W., Higginson, J. Arch. Path.1959, 68, 380.
11. Yudkin, J. Lancet, 1957, ii, 155.12. Keys, A. Circulation, 1961, 23, 805.13. Bronte-Stewart, B. Brit. med. Bull. 1958, 14, 243.14. Keys, A., Kimura, N., Kusukawa, A., Bronte-Stewart, B., Larsen, N.,
Keys, M. H. Ann. intern. Med. 1958, 48, 83.15. Becker, B. J. P. Lancet, 1958, ii, 1019.16. Charters, A. D., Arya, B. P. ibid. 1960, i, 288.17. Charters, A. D. ibid. 1961, i, 773.18. Walker, A. R. P. ibid. p. 512.19. Walker, A. R. P. Amer. J. clin. Nutr. 1961, 9, 461.20. Isaacson, C., Seftel, H. C., Schamroth, L., Keeley, K. J. Lancet, July 1
1961, p. 50.21. Walker, A. R. P. Brit. med. J. 1960, i, 1660.
with advances in the classification of lesions, some clarificationmay be expected. Our investigations 10 suggest that percentageof mineral matter (especially calcium) in arterial tissue mayprovide a more objective index of atheroma than naked-eyeappraisal of lesions. But knowledge is incomplete: for example,we urgently need to know whether there is or is not a grossdifference in the coronary atherosclerosis picture at LondonHospital,2 compared with Presbyterian Hospital, New YorkCity,3 as the cited publications suggest.Yudkin refers again 1 to the increase in mortality from c.H.D.
in Britain paralleling that of increase of licenses issued for radioand television. His earlier view 11 has been commented on bya number of writers, recently by Keys,12 to whom he may bereplying.He mentions the limited correlation between total fat intake
and mortality-rate from c.H.D., and states that correlation is nobetter if attempts are made to differentiate between saturatedand unsaturated fats. This conclusion is at variance with thatof Bronte-Stewart,13 who holds that " qualitative rather thanquantitative differences in the dietary fat intake could explainbetter the reported differences in mortality from the disease."The statement that the Japanese are said to have as much
atherosclerosis as white Americans is hardly true. In one
investigation, postmortem studies have indicated that severecoronary atherosclerosis in Japanese men is about a tenth ofthat of white Americans." Furthermore, Yudkin’s statementthat there is still some doubt whether the South African Bantuhave much or little atherosclerosis is also incorrect. Every largepostmortem series has amply demonstrated that atherosclerosiscertainly occurs among the Bantu, but that the incidence andseverity, and certainly the complications in so far as C.H.D. isconcerned, are less than they are in white populations.15Yudkin refers to the anomalous situation regarding fat intake
and C.H.D. among Indians in Kenya. Now, according to Chartersand Arya,16 the Gugerati Indians (vegetarian) in Nairobi con-sume about 100 g. fat per day, whereas the Punjabi Indians(non-vegetarian) consume about 130 g. fat per day. I certainlydo not regard 100 g. as a " little
" fat intake. FurthermoreC.H.D. mortality among both groups is not " low ", it is high 17 ;indeed, among immigrant Indian groups elsewhere, whether inSingapore, Kampala, Johannesburg or Durban, C.H.D.
mortality-rates among males are among the highest in theworld.18
With the main burden of Professor Yudkin’s paper 1-
namely, that the part played by deficiency of essentialfatty acids in the pathogenesis of c.H.D. is far fromestablished-there can be no quarrel. I think, withProfessor Yudkin, that the study of populations providingexceptions, real or apparent, to current hypotheses can bevery salutary. In Johannesburg, with 600,000 Bantu, wehave a moiety of prosperous persons, owning motor cars;we have many old Bantu; we have some Bantu withhigh serum-cholesterol levels (over 300 mg. per 100 ml.),with long blood-clot-lysis times, with severe arterial
lesions, and with hypertension.19 Yet at BaragwanathHospital (2000 beds), there is so far an average of about1 death per year from myocardial infarction.20 Further
north, in certain regions, among indigenous African
groups, there are very high consumers of animal fat21;yet our inquiries, direct and indirect, do not suggest ahigh incidence of C.H.D. among them; and this impression
22. Salomon, M. I. Amer. Heart J. 1961, 62, 143.23. Lancet, 1961, i, 1141.
is supported by Salomon.22 It remains our hope that thestudy of populations of the type described, and of popula-tions in transition, may contribute valuable information.The studies mentioned are being financed in part by a grant from
the National Heart Institute, United States Public Health Service.
ALEXANDER R. P. WALKER.
South African Institutefor Medical Research,
Johannesburg,South Africa.
COLLES’ FRACTURE
G. A. STANTON.
SIR,-I must share with Mr. Stone (Dec. 9) his astonish-ment at your annotation of Oct. 28. Anyone who has hadyears of experience in the treatment of Colles’ fracturemust agree that failure to obtain a good functional resultis rare.
As he points out, in the younger age group it is rare to haveanything but a good cosmetic and functional result. In peopleover 40, who include the only entity which can with truth betermed a Colles’ fracture, the functional result seems to dependfar less on complete reduction of the fracture and is consistentwith even a marked degree of ultimate deformity. Thosefractures which do badly are found in those patients who refuseto follow explicit instructions to keep the fingers, elbow, andshoulders on the move.
It is our rule at the Leicester Royal Infirmary fractureclinic to ask each one of these patients who is being dischargedat the ninth week, having been in plaster for the first six weeks,to come back and report at the desk if they have any furthertrouble. In nine years, involving some hundreds of cases, thenumber of people returning could be counted on the fingers ofone hand. In view of these excellent functional results the useof Steinmann’s pins in order to achieve 100% reduction seemsto be unnecessary.
Great Glen,Leicestershire.
IS NOTIFICATION USEFUL ?
I. GORDONMedical Officer of Health.
Public Health Offices,Ilford.
SIR,-My appreciation of the publicity you gave to myannual report in your issue of Dec. 9 (p. 1314) is some-what tempered by the thought that within a few days Ishall, as a result, receive a rather peremptory letter fromthe Minister of Health and the county medical officer ofhealth for Essex, inquiring why Ilford, alone of all
sanitary authorities in England, has had no notificationsof whooping-cough, measles, or scarlatina during 1960.
In fact, as you will note from the relevant pages in thereport, 397, 73, and 234 notifications respectively of thesediseases were received. Very possibly you looked at thetable which stated that there were no deaths from thesediseases.
*** We are very sorry.-ED. L.
MEASUREMENT OF URINARY PROTEIN
SiR,-The turbidometric method described by Lewisand Richards 23 was originally published by my collabora-tor B. Minz in Klinische Wochenschrift in 1930. We used,at that time a Zeiss nephelometer and casein solution asstandard. We also found that 10% salicylsulphonic acidwas the best concentration for the reagent.
It must be pointed out, however, that, to obtain reliableresults, the urine should be filtered before the reagent is added.It was with this method that we first established the thenunrecognised fact that small amounts of protein of the orderof 3-9 mg. per day are excreted by normal people, and thatthe amount is increased in inflammatory conditions.The method has since been used repeatedly with human