Dr. Rafael Cantón Volver a la Página Inicial · Departamento de Microbiología II Universidad...
Transcript of Dr. Rafael Cantón Volver a la Página Inicial · Departamento de Microbiología II Universidad...
Controversias en PROA y en la
lucha contra las IRAS y las
resistencias
Resistencia a los
antibióticos en España:
¿qué es lo que nos debe
preocupar más?
Departamento de
Microbiología II
Universidad
Complutense. Madrid
Hospital Universitario Ramón y CajalSERVICIO DE MICROBIOLOGÍA Y PARASITOLOGÍA
Dr. Rafael Cantón
1 de diciembre de 2017
Agradecimientos
▪ Elevado consumo de antimicrobianos
▪ Altas tasas de resistencia y tendencia
a su mayor aumento
▪ ¿Resistencias ocultas?
▪ Resistencia a nuevos antibióticos
▪Herramientas poco adecuadas en el
estudio de sensibilidad
Resistencias: ¿qué nos debe preocupar?
Laxminarayan et al. Science 2016; 10.1126/science.aaf9286
Países con mayor consumo de antimicrobianos, 2014
(datos de IMS Health MIDAS)
Resistencias: ¿qué nos debe preocupar?
Resistencias: ¿qué nos debe preocupar?
▪ Elevado consumo de antimicrobianos (2016) en la comunicad en
comparación con otros países con aumento en los últimos años (2012-16)
ECDC. Summary of the latest data on antibiotic consumption in the EU. ESAC-Net surveillance data. Nov 2017
Consumption of
antibiotics for
systemic use in the
community, EU/EEA
countries, 2016
(expressed as DDD/
1000 inhabitants/day)
Resistencias: ¿qué nos debe preocupar?
ECDC. Summary of the latest data on antibiotic consumption in the EU. ESAC-Net surveillance data. Nov 2017
Consumption of
antibiotics for
systemic use in the
community by
antibiotic group,
EU/EEA countries,
2016 (at ATC group
level 3, expressed
as DDD/1.000
inhabitants/day)
(b) Spain provided reimbursement data (i.e. not
including consumption without a prescription
or other non-reimbursed courses)
Resistencias: ¿qué nos debe preocupar?
▪ Ausencia de datos de consumo de antimicrobianos agregados en los
hospitales españoles en informes del ECDC
ECDC. Summary of the latest data on antibiotic consumption in the EU. ESAC-Net surveillance data. Nov 2017
Consumption of
antibiotics for
systemic use in
the hospital
sector, EU/EEA
countries, 2016
(expressed as
DDD/1000
inhabitants/day)
Point prevalence survey of healthcare associated infections and antimicrobial use
in European acute care hospitals. 2011-12. Stockholm: ECDC; 2013
Carbapenem use in EU (2011-12)
Resistencias: ¿qué nos debe preocupar?
Tigecycline/colistin use in EU (2011-12)
Sales of colistin for use in food producing animals in 2014 (in mg/PCU), including the 5 and 1 mg/PCU levels
Updated advice on the use of colistin products in animals within the European Union: development
of resistance and possible impact on human and animal health EMA/CVMP/CHMP/231573/2016
PCU: population correction unit,
1 PCU: 1 kg animal
Resistencias: ¿qué nos debe preocupar?
▪ Elevado consumo de antimicrobianos
▪ Altas tasas de resistencia y tendencia
a su mayor aumento
▪ ¿Resistencias ocultas?
▪ Resistencia a nuevos antibióticos
▪Herramientas poco adecuadas en el
estudio de sensibilidad
Resistencias: ¿qué nos debe preocupar?
GLOBAL PRIORITY LIST OF ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANT BACTERIA TO GUIDE RESEARCH, DISCOVERY, AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEW ANTIBIOTICS
Tacconelli and Magrini, 25 Feb 2017
▪ Previous pathogen list issued by the
CDC1 and the Public Health Agency
of Canada2
▪ Guided by pharma companies
according to perceived/unmet
medical need, pressure of
investors, market size, scientific
discovery potential, and availability
of specific technologies
▪ Issued to guide prioritization of
funding and incentives, aling R&D
priorities and coordination in the
fight against antimicrobial resistant
bacteria1CDC, Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2013; Disponible en:
http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/.2Garner MJ. et al. An Assessment of Antimicrobial Resistant Disease Threats in
Canada. PLoS ONE 2015; 10(4): e0125155. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125155.
Disponible en: http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/WHO-PPL-
Short_Summary_25Feb-ET_NM_WHO.pdf?ua=1
3rd generation cephalosporin resistance in Europe
(invasive isolates, EARS-net 2016)
Escherichia coli Klebsiella pneumoniae
ECDC. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe 2016. Annual Report of the European
Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net). Stockholm: ECDC; 2017
22.3%
3rd gen. cephalosporin resistance in Spain
(invasive isolates, EARS-net)
15,0%
E. coli
K. pneumoniae
Gráficos extraídos de: ECDC. Surveillance Atlas of Infectious Disease. 2016. Disponible en: http://atlas.ecdc.europa.eu/public/index.aspx
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
% a
isla
do
s
Años
E. coli K.neumoniae
SMART Spain (2002 – 2015)
Evolution of E. coli and K. pneumoniae ESBL producers*
Actualizado de Cantón et al. Rev Esp Quimiother 2011; 24:223-32
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
AUG P/T CTX CAZ CPE IMP ETP AK CIP
non-ESBL 2002-2010
non ESBL 2011-2015
ESBL 2002-2010
ESBL 2011-2015
% of susceptible E. coli isolates with and without ESBLs
Updated information from Cantón et al. Rev Esp Quimiother 2011; 24:223-32
SMART España (2002 – 2015)
SMART España (2002 – 2015)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
AUG P/T CTX CAZ CPE IMP ETP AK CIP
non-ESBL 2002-2010
non-ESBL 2011-2015
ESBL 2002-2015
ESBL 2011-2015
Actualizado de Cantón et al. Rev Esp Quimiother 2011; 24:223-32
¿Carbapenemases?
% of susceptible K. pnuemoniae isolates with and without ESBLs
Enterobacterias productoras de carbapenemasas (EPCs)
▪Carbapenemasas: Grupo heterogéneo de enzimas que
hidrolizan carbapenems y, en general, otros β-lactámicos
▪ Clase A KPC, …
▪ Clase B VIM, IMP, NDM, …
▪ Clase D OXA-48
Diferente epidemiología
Expresión variable (detección compleja)
Limitaciones terapéuticas
Manejo del paciente colonizado
Escherichia coli Klebsiella pneumoniae
Carbapenem resistance in Europe
(invasive isolates, EARS-net 2016)
ECDC. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe 2016. Annual Report of the European
Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net). Stockholm: ECDC; 2017
Carbapenem resistance in Spain
(invasive isolates, EARS-net)
3.8%
0.1%E. coli
K. pneumoniae
Gráficos extraídos de: ECDC. Surveillance Atlas of Infectious Disease. 2016. Disponible en: http://atlas.ecdc.europa.eu/public/index.aspx
▪ 2003 Detection of sporadic cases in Barcelona (VIM)Tórtola et al. AAC 2005; 49:3492-4
▪ 2005-09 Outbreaks in different hospitals in Madrid area (VIM and
KPC) with no associated travel history Tato et al. CID 2007; 45:1171-8; Curiao et al. JAC 2010; 65:1608-14
Sánchez-Romero et al. AAC 2012; 56:420-7
▪ 2009 Demonstration of a very low prevalence (mainly VIM) in a
national multicenter study (VIM)Miró et al. EJCMID 2013; 32:253-9
▪ 2010 Detection of imported cases: sporadic cases (NDM) and
important hospital outbreaks (OXA-48) Struelens et al. Euro Surveill 2010; 15:pii:19716; Sole et al. AAC 2011; 55:4402-4
▪ 2011-13 Extrahospitalary cases with no previous sanitary contact Gijón et al. JCM 2012; 50:1558-63
Local outbreaks and dispersion in different areas (OXA-48)Paño-Pardo JAC 2013; 68:89-96; Oteo et al. JAC 2013; 68:317-21
Oteo et al . AAC 2013 ; 57:6344-7
▪ 2017Increase of complexity
Carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae – Spain
Carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae – Europe
Endemic
Interregional spread
Regional spread
Independent hospital outbreaks
Single hospital outbreaks
Sporadic occurrence
Not reported / no data
KPC
VIM
NDM
OXA-48
Other countries:
Israel
Luxembourg
Cantón et al. Clin
Microbiol Infect 2012;
18:413-31
February, 2012
March, 2013
Glasner et al. Euro
Surveillance
2013 ; 18(28) doi:pii: 20525
CPE: enzyme distribution in Europe: 2015
Albiger et al. Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Europe: assessment
by national experts from 38 countries, May 2015 (EUSCAPE Project)
KPC
OXA-48 NDM
VIM
Anual evolution of E. coli with carbapenemases
Towards an endemic
situation similar to
that of CTX-M ESBLs?
Hospital No. of
specimens
CPE
(%)
Carbapenemase type
KPC NDM VIM OXA-48 Other
MBL
CHUAC 3088 60 (1.9) 0 0 0 60 0
HCB 1593 28 (1.7) 0 1 0 27 0
HURS 814 15 (1.8) 10 0 0 4 1
HULP 3700 38 (1.0) 0 0 7 31 0
HURyC 2631 48 (1.8) 3 1 2 42 0
Total 11826 189 (1.6) 13 2 9 164 1
169 K. pneumoniae; 9 E. coli; 6 E. cloacae; 4 S. marcescens; 3 K. oxytoca; 1 E. aerogenes
García-Castillo et al. SEIMC 2017. Málaga. Abstract 901
Prevalence of CPE in urine specimens
(iCREST study*, Spain)
*octubre 2016 – enero 2017
Carbapenem and colistin resistance in K. pneumoniae
in Europe (invasive isolates, EARS-net 2016)
ECDC. Summary of the latest data on antibiotic resistance in the EU.
EARS-Net surveillance data November 2017
Colistin resistance in CPE
Chromosomal colistin resistance epidemics
Poirel et al. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017; 30:557-96
▪ 21 hospitals across Italy. November 2013 to April 2014, EuSCAPE
▪ Consecutive non-replicatecarbapenem non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae
clinical isolates (n=191)
- 93% (n=178) KPC producers
- 82% (n=146) trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-R+I
- 43% (n=76) colistin-R
- 16% (n=29) gentamicin-R+I
- 6% (n=11) tigecyclin-R+I
Multidrug resistant K. pneumoniae
▪ KPC-producing K pneumoniae isolates
increasingly spreading in Spain, mainly
due to the non-ST258 high-risk clones:
- ST11/KPC-2
- ST101/KPC-2 (highly R, hypervirulent)
- ST512/KPC-3 (colistin-R due to a 11 bp
deletion in mgrB gene)
▪ Similar clones than those spreading in
Italy
mcr-1 worldwide
Marston et al. JAMA 2016; 316:1193-1204
Eurosurveillance , 31 March 2016
Euro Surveill. 2017 Aug 3;22(31)
Eurosurveillance; 28 April 2016
mcr-1 gene can be also present in
colistin-susceptible E. coli isolates
mcr-1-(+) isolates
Colistin MIC distribution (EUCAST database)
Antimicrobial resistance in P. aeruginosa(invasive isolates, EARS-net, 2016)
Ceftazidime
Carbapenems
ECDC. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe 2016. Annual Report of the European
Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net). Stockholm: ECDC; 2017
% of invasive isolates with combined resistance to ≥3 antimicrobials* in 2016 (*piper/tazob, ceftazidime, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides and/or carbapenems)
Antimicrobial resistance in P. aeruginosa(invasive isolates, EARS-net, 2016)
ECDC. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe 2016. Annual Report of the European
Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net). Stockholm: ECDC; 2017
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
% of isolates
Antimicrobial resistance in P. aeruginosa(invasive isolates, Spain EARS-net)
% of invasive isolates with combined resistance* to ≥3 antimicrobials (*piper/tazob, ceftazidime, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides and/or carbapenems)
http://atlas.ecdc.europa.eu/public/index.aspx
▪ Elevado consumo de antimicrobianos
▪ Altas tasas de resistencia y tendencia
a su mayor aumento
▪ ¿Resistencias ocultas?
▪ Resistencia a nuevos antibióticos
▪Herramientas poco adecuadas en el
estudio de sensibilidad
Resistencias: ¿qué nos debe preocupar?
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1983-1987 1988-1992 1993-1997 1998-2002 2003-2007 2008-2012 2013-2017
nu
mb
er
of
ne
w a
nti
mic
roib
ials
Years
Update information from Spielberg, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;3 1: 1279-86
Ceftobiprole (2013)
Telavancina (2014)
Dalbavancina (2015)
Tedizolid (2015)
Oritavancina (2015)
Ceftolozano-tazobactam (2015)
Ceftazidima-avibactam (2016)
Delafloxacina (2017)
Meropenem-vaborbactam (2017)
Nuevos antibacterianos aprobados (FDA y/o EMA)
Ceftaroline (2010)
Fidaxomicin (2012)
En proceso de autorización:
Plazomicina, eravaciclina, imipenem-relebactam, cefepime-tazobactam, aztreonam-avibactam,
cefidericol, fosfomicina (ZTI-01)…
Antibacterials recently approved (FDA or EMA)
Antibacterial drug Approved for Other indications
Ceftaroline CABP, ABSSSI (incl. MRSA)
Fidaxomicin CDI
Telavancin NP due to S. aureus (limited to MRSA in EU) ABSSSI
Dalbavacin ABSSSI CABP, osteomyelitis
Oritavancin ABSSSI due to Gram-(+)s including MRSA
Tedizolid ABSSSI NP
Ceftobiprol HABP (not VABP), CABP
Ceftolozane-tazobactam cUTI (incl. acute pyelonephritis), cIAI
(+ metronidazole)
HABP, VABP
Ceftazidime-avibactam cUTI (incl. acute pyelonephritis), cIAI
(+metronidazole), HABP incl. VABP, multi-R
Delafloxacin cUTI (incl. acute pyelonephritis) ABSSSI
Meropenem-vaborbactam cUTI (incl. acute pyelonephritis) cIAI, HABP, VABP, …
ABSSSI: acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infections; cIAI: complicated intraabdominal infecions; CDI: C. difficile
infection, cUTI: complicated urinary tract infections; CABP: community acquired bacterial pneumonia; HABP: hospital
acquired bacterial pneumonia; NP: nosocomia pneumonia; VABP: ventilator associated bacterial pneumonia
Resistencias: ¿qué nos debe preocupar?
Emergence of ceftolozane-tazobactam (TZC) resistance in P. aeruginosa
▪ In-vitro selection of TZC resistance requires multiple mutations leading
to over expression and structural modifications of AmpC
Cabot et al. AAC 2014; 58:3091-9
▪ In-vivo emergence of TZC resistance in TZC treated patients
MacVane et al. AAC 2017; 61: e01183-17; Fraile-Ribot et al, AAC 2017; 61(9). pii: e01117-17Fraile-Ribot et al. JAC 2017; Nov 14 [Epub ahead of print]
AmpC-high (new mutations/
deletion) + OprD low
CAZ: 16-32 mg/L
IMP: 16 mg/L
TZC: 32->32 mg/L
OXA-14 / OXA-53, OprD-low
CAZ: >64 mg/L
IMP: 16 mg/L
TZC: 32 mg/L
WT
CAZ: 2 mg/L
IMP: 1 mg/L
TZC: 0.5 mg/L
AmpC-high +
OprD-low
CAZ: 16-32 mg/L
IMP: 16 mg/L
TZC: 2 mg/L
OXA-2 / OXA-10
CAZ: 2 mg/L
IMP: 2 mg/L
TZC: 4 mg/L
Resistencias: ¿qué nos debe preocupar?
Emergence of ceftolozane-tazobactam resistance in P. aeruginosa
▪ From isolates with previous hyperproduction of AmpC (ceftazidme
resistance) and porin OprD deficiency (carbapenem resistance)
▪ From isolates with classical acquired β-lactamases (OXA-2 / OXA-10)
widely present in P. aeruginosa
▪ Affecting high-risk clones (i.e. ST175)
▪ In all cases causes resistance to cefazidime-avibactam but might
decrease imipenem and piper.-tazobactam MICs (not in OXA-variants)
Cabot et al. AAC 2014; 58:3091-9; MacVane et al. AAC 2017; 61: e01183-17; Fraile-Ribot et al, AAC 2017; 61(9). pii: e01117-17; Fraile-Ribot et al. JAC 2017; Nov 14 [Epub ahead of print]
2015; 59:5324-30
▪ MIC increase from 2-4 mg/L
to 32->256 mg/L in isolates
from three patients (8%, 3/37)
• Patients with resistant isolates
were treated during 15 days
(range 10-19 days)
▪ Mutations in the bla sequence
after ceftazidime-avibactam
exposure
Resistencias: ¿qué nos debe preocupar?
Resistencias: ¿qué nos debe preocupar?
Emergence of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in Enteobacteriaceae
▪ Overexpression of extended-spectrum AmpC (ESAC) in E. cloacaeLahiri et al. JAC 2014; 69:2942-6
▪ KPC-K. pneumoniae with multiple resistance mechanisms:
- KPC-3 overexpression plus porin deficiency (OmpK35/OmpK36),
and SHV-12 and enhance efflux activity (AcrAB)Nelson et al. AAC 2017; 61:e00989-17; Humphries et al. AAC 2017; 61:e00537-17
- Doble or triple blaKPC-3 mutationsShields et al, AAAC 2017; 61: e02097-16; Haidar et al. AAC 2017;e02534-16
Lahiri et al. AAC 2017; 61:e00079-17
- blaKPC-2 mutationsCompain et al. AAC 2017; 61:e00451-17
▪ Increase hydrolitic activity of bla CTX-M-14 variantsBoth et al.J Antmicrob Chemother 2017; 72: 2483–8
▪ Restoration of carbapenem susceptibility, expression as an ESBL
▪ Elevado consumo de antimicrobianos
▪ Altas tasas de resistencia y tendencia
a su mayor aumento
▪ ¿Resistencias ocultas?
▪ Resistencia a nuevos antibióticos
▪Herramientas poco adecuadas en el
estudio de sensibilidad
Resistencias: ¿qué nos debe preocupar?
J Clin Microbiol 2017; 55:344-5
Tendency to report R as S (VME)
Resistencias: ¿qué nos debe preocupar?
S I R EA CA VME ME mE
BMD 65
(90.3)
1
(1.4)
6
(8.3)
- - - - -
Etest 64
(88.9)
2
(1.4)
6
(8.3)
57/72
(79.2)
69/72
(95.8)
0
(0.0)
0
(0.0)
3/72
(4.2)
Disk 63
(87.5)
3
(4.2)
6
(8.3)
- 68/72
(75.7)
0
(0.0)
0
(0.0)
4/72
(5.5)
CLSI criteria: S≤ 4/4 mg/L; I: 8/4 mg/L; R≥16/4 mg/L
EA: essential agreement; CA: categorical agreement
VME: very major errors; ME: major errors; mE: minor errors
▪ Essential and categorical agreement between BMD and Etest or
disk diffusion susceptibility testing methods for ceftolozane-
tazobactam with 72 carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa
Shields et al. J Clin Microbiol 2017; 22 Nov [Epub ahead of print]
Resistencias: ¿qué nos debe preocupar?
Ceftolozano – tazobactam
sensible
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Ceftolozano – tazobactam
Resistentes
Dra. MI. Morosni
Resistencias: ¿qué nos debe preocupar?
S I R EA CA VME ME mE
BMD 61
(81.4)
-
-
13
(18.6)
- - - - -
Etest 63
(85.1)
-
-
11
(14.9)
66/74
(89.2)
72/74
(97.3)
2/13
(15.4)
0
(0.0)
-
Disk 43
(81.1)
14
(18.9)
- 56/74
(75.7)
0
(0.0)
18/59
(30.5)
-
CLSI criteria: S≤ 8/4 mg/L; R≥16/4 mg/L
EA: essential agreement; CA: categorical agreement
VME: very major errors; ME: major errors; mE: minor errors
▪ Essential and categorical agreement between BMD and Etest or
disk diffusion susceptibility testing methods for ceftazidime-
avibactam with 74 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae
Shields et al. J Clin Microbiol 2017; 22 Nov [Epub ahead of print]
▪ Elevado consumo de antimicrobianos
▪ Altas tasas de resistencia y tendencia
a su mayor aumento
▪ ¿Resistencias ocultas?
▪ Resistencia a nuevos antibióticos
▪Herramientas poco adecuadas en el
estudio de sensibilidad
Resistencias: ¿qué nos debe preocupar?
Controversias en PROA y en la
lucha contra las IRAS y las
resistencias
Resistencia a los
antibióticos en España:
¿qué es lo que nos debe
preocupar más?
Departamento de
Microbiología II
Universidad
Complutense. Madrid
Hospital Universitario Ramón y CajalSERVICIO DE MICROBIOLOGÍA Y PARASITOLOGÍA
Dr. Rafael Cantón
1 de diciembre de 2017