Maritza Salcido-Rocha, A200 832 424 (BIA Sept. 26, 2013)

7/27/2019 Maritza Salcido-Rocha, A200 832 424 (BIA Sept. 26, 2013)

1/7

Oltarsh, Jennifer Esq.494 Eighth Avenue Suite 1704New York NY 10001

Name: SALCIDO-ROCHA, MARITZA

pm Jusi

Executve Oce r Imigation Reew

Board of Imigton ApealsOce of he Cek

50 b Pk Suite 2000Fals Chrc Vg 4

HS/ICE Oice of Chief Cousel SND880 Front St Room 1234San Diego CA 92101-8834

A 200-832-424

Date o his notice 9/26/2013

nclosed s a copy of the Boa's ecson a orde the above-eence case.

Enclosue

Pl Mb:Gran wa

Snceey,

DC cDonna Ca

Cef Clerk

: _ 1 r cket

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished

Cite as: Maritza Salcido-Rocha, A200 832 424 (BIA Sept. 26, 2013)


2/7

. I

U.S Departmet of JustceExecutivefce r Immaion Review

Fa Chch, Vrinia

Fie A200 832 424 - San Dego, CA

n re: ARITZ SALCDOROHA

N EMOVAL PROCEDNG

APPEAL

Dcson o the Boad of mmigao Appeals

DateSEP 2 6 013

ON BEHAL OF RESPONDEN: eifer Olsh, Esquire

O EHAL O HS

APPLAON eoenng

Ted Y YadaDeuty Chief ounse

Te responen as appeale om e Immgraion Judges deison dated June 7, 202 hemmation Judg dened e resondents oon o reoen roeedings in whic she wasordere removed in absentia. The reord wl e reme to e migrato Judge r herroeedings

he Bod rves Igraon Judg's dings of t clung ndngs as to ecrediliy of estmony unde e "lely eroeous stadard. 8 C.. 1003.()()(). TeBord reviews questions of law dscretion, judent al other issues in aeals om

decisios of Immatio uges de novo 8 ..R. 1003.d))ii).

On apeal resondet argues hat se has demostrated exeional circstaces rer ailure to apear 8 U.S 12a(b5)() and 122ae){) The responentaintains ha se was abe to board her erer seduled ight that would hae ensed heraival in San Diego CA, pior o er heing, ue to rgeng to bng her dentiaton to heapo. Te resondent roug ousel, nicates on the Note o Appea (Fom EOIR26) n her aelate bref at she aeared a e Immgraton Cur on he a o her eigHowever, the Imigratio udge d not me cual ndngs in s wrien eisionregdng wheer e respondent apeed in ou on the day of her heng. Pz

Muksy 516 3d 770, 774 Cir 008); Vlnc-Fgs Asc 321 3 204 (

ir. 2003) M f H 23 &N Dec 462 IA 2002 rovding at Bod has imied ndng auort on apea). n ght o he regong we nd i propae o remd eecord o e mgraon ge o make adonal ctual nings and r e enr o newdeson e respondent a te Dpamen o omeland Seurt sould be sred wi acop of te ecso and soud ereaer be gien oporni to subm riefs in acoanewt the regulations Acordngly, the lowing order wll be entered.

1 Ts od aoogizes r e mstake w rgard ouse's ey of an apee o bealfof e responen nd the mproer ssuce o e breng scheule n tis maer. We haeconsdered e otens o e responent's re in this mater.



3/7

00 3

OER Te reord reande to e mmration de r er roeednsonssen e regoin deson



4/7

-

D SAES PARM F JUTI

XCV FF OR GR RW

GR R

SO-ROA Z

221 L S

CAJN 221

N H F

ADRA, Z

401 WS A S, S #800

S O A 92101

F A -83-2 : un 7, 2012

AB RWD - DRSS OD

- ACH S CY F CSO H GR G. ' DCS'; IS FN L A S F W BRD F GRO SH 30 D Y A O OF Rf DCSN

S H NL FRS SCOS FOR RRY Y YOR OC CD OCS D F R F Q

S B D O BRD F GO

OFFC OF RK

B 853

FALS R, 22041

C S COY OF CSON O G J A H S

O R F YOR CD H

S DS FL S A O R FD N lORDC

WH SCO 242B(c)(3) F Y A 8 SC

SN 22B) 3) ON ROCG R SC 20)6)

8 S S 122ac) (6) N RCDGS. F Y

O RON YR S B F W S COR

HR

GRAON CR

401 WS A SR T 800

S DO, A 92101

ORLAD, DD DY E OS

80 R R 2

S DG C 2101

FF


5/7

UNITED STATS DPARTMNT OF STICE

XEUTVE OE R MMGATON REVEWUND STS MMIGRATION COT

40 West A Sreet, Suie 800an iego alfnia 920

Fe No: A200 82 424 ) ae: Jue 7 2012)

he Mtter of

Mrt SLCIOOCH,

Rspondent

ON BHALF OF RESPODNT:

Pro Se

)) N REOVL PREEGS

BEHA O DEPRTMET OHOMLAND SEURTY:

avd Orlad, squre880 Fron Seet, Suite 2246S iego, Ca 920

CHRGE: Sction 212a)6Ai o he Iigrton and Nationa ct,Present Wthot Adsson or ole)

PLICATION: Moton to Reopen

ECSON AND OE OF THE GRAON JUDGE

On October 2, 200, e epen o Hoed Scurt "S personaly served threspondent wit Notce to Apper "NA) (h 1 ), chging her wt reovabili uder section212(a6(A) of the ton nd Natonalty Act "Act), s an aien pest i the UtedSttes wthot bng adied or paroed, or who ived n the ned Staes t ny tme or pceor s designted by the toey General S aleged tt th rspodent is ntiead ctizn of Mexco who ved in the ntd States at uno octo on or bout Octobr2, 1995 d was not then adittd or proe ae inspection by an mition fcr OnOctober 22, 2010, t DS ed the NA wth the Phonx Igraton Cour, tereby sting itwth jursdiction oer te poceedngs S 8 C 1004() (200)

t the aster caendar hering on Apr 26, 2011, e respondent apped wthcounsl, d he Cort granted th respondnt a contnunc r attoy prprton At t nextmaster cend hng on Jury 24 202, he respondent, rough cousel, oved r a chgeof venue to e S iego Igration Cour ecas she hd oved to Cjon, C as

As neither p appeaed the Cos dcison, no ranscript hs ben producd;however, s nation is gleed om he ecord of Pocedigs and th udo recordg ofthe hearings, which te Cour revewed in prepation of ts decision.


6/7

evidenced by the Change of Address Form (Exh 4 The Cour granted the motion. (Order of theCour, Jauar 24, 2012. (Exh. 5. O Ju 31, 202, a Notce of Hering was ent by m tobt couse the repondet hersef oting them at e ext heig ws schedued in SaDiego on A 2012 at 30 a . (Exh. 6) Coune susequenty ed a moto to withdaw onFeru 6 2012. Howeer, the Cour reected ths ing on Feby 10, 202 r mroer proofof service. (Exh 7)

On Apri 10, 2012, the Cour went o the record at 10:21 a Neiher te resoet nor eattoey of record apeared No one ese appered on her behaf. The Cou noed that snce it hadreected reondent's coune' ig, counse reained the attoey of rcord in is cae. Neitherthe Cour nor e DHS coune had y formation bere em that woud expai thereonent's asence. The DHS requested at the Cour roceed bst uer section240( )((A) of the Act, d e Co, ding proper notice, ted e request. The DHS ed aRecord of Deorabe/nadmissibe Aien (Fo 213. The Cou hed that based on eirmation contaied i the Form -23, the DHS had presented ce, unequioc, d conicingevidence that e respondent was removabe s charged. As e resondent wa not resent toestabish eigibii r any reief om reova, the Cour ordered the respondent reoved to

Mexico on e charge contained i the NTA S Decision (Apri 0, 2012

On Ar 13, 2012, te repondent ed her Motio to Reoe The respondent gues atshe faed to apear at her hearng because her ight ied n San Dego at 1030 am. on the day ofthe heig. (Rep't Mot to Reopen.) She cas that her origia ight was scheued to re eday bere, but she mise ths ght ecaue she ad to retu hoe r a paspor Id Resondetaso mention that her hsbd d he re currety gong though a dvorce ad e uder nciatran Id. Respondent woud ike e Cou to consider that she has ied n te Unted Stateswithout incident r seveneen yers nd reopen her proceedigs Id Attached to the motion, were acoy of pe tickets o Tpa, Forida to Houston, Texas ad om Housto, Texas to S

Diego, Caia on Apr 10, 2012 showing expected arria i San Diego at 034 a.m, as we asa fee wer request. Id

O May 14, 202, he D e its Opposition o Resondet's Motion to Reopen. TheDH gued tat the resodent' mie ght the ay bere the eig and ate ara to SDiego on te day of te hearig ae ot exceptioa circumtces (DH' Opp'n, 2-3.)

A mmiation udge ay, upon a otion by an aen, reope y cse in whch he or shehas made a decision, unes ursdiction is vested in the Board of atio Appeas. CF.R. 1003.23(b)( (2012) A remoa order entered n bstpsut to secton 240(b)( of e Actay e recinded upo a otion to reopen ed within 180 days aer the date of te order f e

aien demonsates that the fure to ape was cause by excetioa circumce Section240(b)(5(C)(i) of e Act CF.R 1003.23()(4(ii)(A)() xceptiona crcmtce rrs tocircumstace beyond the contro of the aien, suc a battery or extree crue to the aien, seriouines o te aen, or serious iness or eath of the spouse, chid, or ent of the aien, but og

Resondet's request to waive the required ing e is ted

A200 32 424 2 e 7, 202


7/7

less comellng See secton 240e) ) of te Act e Cour "loos to te parcularzed ctspresented eac case n order to detene weter or not excetonal crcumstces exst ingh: IN 2 d 050 052 t Cr 2000

e Cour nds tat wle te resondents moton s tmely, based on te arcularzedcts n ts cse, te resondent as not sown, on te cuent record, tat er le to ae was

due to excetonal crcumstances beyond er control rsporato delays or comlcaos on teway to mmgraton ou eang, generally do not conttute excetonal ccumstances ascontemlated by te Act See Sharm NS, 8 d 545 t Cr 996) dng ac dcultesdd not qual as exceptonal ccumstnces justng rescsson of deportaton order entered inbsenti); DeMorles v. INS, 1 6 3d 45 5t Cr 1997) ndng mecncal breadown ofalen's automoble on te way to Cour coupled wt oter ctors s ot an excetoalcrcumsce; te of-A2 I&N ec 050 B 997) ndg delays caused by ea acdo not consttute excetona crcumstances e respondent camed at se mssed her orgnalgt, scedled to are on te day bere te heng because se ad to re ome r aassor Rest Mot to Reope Se as not suored er moto wt sucet edence tosow exceptona crcstances beyond er control er moton, e resondent wrote se had "to

ret ome n ama, yet te address se roded sows er ome to be n S ego Coun Inaddton, te resondent s not roded roof of er orgnly sceduled gt to San egoureore, the resondent as not exaned wy se ws ama or why se resceduled ergt to e n S ego at 104 am on te day of er eng wen er erg was scheduledr 80 am us, uon consderaton of te edence cuently bere t, te Cour does not ndtat respondet as sown excetonal crcmstance beyond her contro excusng er le toaear

Accordngly te llowng order wll be entered

ORDER

S ORDED tat te moton to reopen s denied.

cc e Respondent

Mr Orland r te HS

A200 832 424 une 7 202

Maritza Salcido-Rocha, A200 832 424 (BIA Sept. 26, 2013)

Documents

Transcript of Maritza Salcido-Rocha, A200 832 424 (BIA Sept. 26, 2013)