Phase 4 Presentation

16
XPres Presentation Tool Combating Sexual Violence through Education

Transcript of Phase 4 Presentation

Page 1: Phase 4 Presentation

XPres Presentation ToolCombating Sexual Violence through

Education

Juan Fernando Maestre
good slogan!
Page 2: Phase 4 Presentation

The Problem: Rape and Violence Against Women Normalized

Page 3: Phase 4 Presentation

Finding the Solution● Familiarize ourselves with the topic● Interview advocates at WRAC, RVAP, RVA

(Chicago), and Iowa CASA (D.M.) to learn what they are trying to do

● Research apps that address the problem

Page 4: Phase 4 Presentation

● Advocates struggling to reach teen and college-aged audiences

● Agencies fighting to collect relevant data to help secure needed funding

● Static apps that did not support interaction with knowledgeable support personnel

● SOLUTION: Support advocates and agencies in their quest to provide effective preventative education

What Did We Find?

Page 5: Phase 4 Presentation

THE IDEA:

● Create an interactive presentation tool that not only allowed presenters to create adaptive presentations, but also gave digital access to content for the audience

● Such a tool would also provide presenter the power to wirelessly collect demographic and effective data automatically stored in a database system

● WE CALLED IT . . .

Page 6: Phase 4 Presentation

Presentation Creation Wizard

● Conversing Model● Quicker for first-time

and infrequent users● Give access to most

important aspects of full program

● Allow experienced users ability to avoid or bypass

Page 7: Phase 4 Presentation

Timeline Concept

● Both presentation and mobile interactions should be displayed on screen

● Users can drop material directly into a timeline

● Audience interaction through mobile devices

Page 8: Phase 4 Presentation

Mobile Interaction App

● Must encourage increased audience participation

● Must allow anonymous and secure usage

● Must allow ability to preview content

● Must support wireless access

Page 9: Phase 4 Presentation

DEMONSTRATION

Juan Fernando Maestre
I don't think we can have a link. The app would have to be uploaded on the Internet for that. Yet, if the app runs from the computer (like from the hard drive) it will run faster.
Michael Watson
Sounds good. I say we put the main screen here.
Juan Fernando Maestre
I think we could just switch the presentation to the desktop or folder containing the files and open the html file...
Page 10: Phase 4 Presentation

Results of Usability Testing: PROS

● Easy to navigate● Familiar interface ● Steps to complete tasks proved memorable● Pop-up windows and error messages provided

helpful feedback● No broken links or unexpected behaviors

Page 11: Phase 4 Presentation

Results of Usability Testing: CONS

● Some confusing labels (too similar in meaning)

● Mis-understanding of the terms (‘wizard’)● Lack of digital clues to help users interact

with timeline interface● Missing functionality (‘tab’ between fields,

direct text entry, quicker error correction for draggable objects)

● No ability to retrieve forgotten login information

Page 12: Phase 4 Presentation

Demographics

● 3 females, 3 males● Gifted and Talented counselor, PhD Counseling

Education student, Public Policy Specialist, Teacher, 2 Public Health Graduate Students

● Most had experience with Powerpoint, Prezi, and basic Windows applications

● All had considerable experience with laptop, smartphone, and tablet technology

● All had given slide presentations in past, but none created such objects more than once a week

Michael Watson
Any additional info from your test subjects here? (program experience in line above as well)
Michael Watson
add other vocations here
Page 13: Phase 4 Presentation

Tasks Completed

*Expected times based on program performance, not on user experience or expertise

Page 14: Phase 4 Presentation

Brief discussion of results

● Large discrepancy in expected and observed times suggest obstacles exist for users to complete desired tasks

● Most likely reasons for discrepancy: Interactive items on page not recognizable with mouse over, lack of contextual changes in interface to indicate system progress, limited keyboard shortcuts

Page 15: Phase 4 Presentation

The future . . .

● Use Java as the programing language● Maintain basic look and feel already established in hi-fi

prototype, improving interactive elements● Address issues raised in usability study● Develop and design additional functionality not included

in prototype● Re-test completed program with new study, including

original target demographic, but also branching out to other educational areas