Provincial Examination Results - New Brunswick · 2018. 9. 1. · Provincial Examination Results...

PPrroovviinncciiaall EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss FFrraannccoopphhoonnee SScchhooooll DDiissttrriiccttss

Department of Education and Early Childhood Development Francophone Assessment and Evaluation Branch

DDeecceemmbbeerr 22001100

To obtain additional copies of this report, or to forward your comments, please use the following address:

Francophone Assessment and Evaluation Branch Department of Education and Early Childhood Development

of New Brunswick P.O. Box 6000 Fredericton, NB

E3B 5H1

Tel.: 506-453-2157 Fax: 506-462-2201

E-mail: [email protected]

Internet : http://www.gnb.ca/0000/francophone-f.asp#1

December 2010 _____________________________________________________________

Une version française de ce document est également disponible.

Contact/Téléphonez aux Communications 506-444-4714

Fax/Télécopie: 506-457-4810

E-ail: [email protected] Internet : http://www.gnb.ca/0000/francophone-f.asp#1

PPrroovviinncciiaall EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss

FFrraannccoopphhoonnee SScchhooooll DDiissttrriiccttss DDeecceemmbbeerr 22001100

ISBN : 978-1-55471-469-1

Francophone School Districts

IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn

i

IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn

he Department of Education and Early Childhood Development is pleased to present this provincial

statistical report to give school staff, parents, and the public a general idea of how students in New Brunswick’s Francophone school districts did on the provincial examinations administered in the 2009-2010 school year. This document has four chapters. The first is an overview of the learning evaluation program. The second chapter provides details on the learning evaluation program at the elementary level. It contains the results of the examinations in Grade 2 and Grade 4 Literacy, Grades 5 and 8 Sciences et technologies, Grades 3, 5, and 8 Mathématiques, and Grades 5 and 8 Français.

The third chapter provides details on the learning evaluation program at the high school level. It contains the results of the examinations in Grade 11 Mathématiques and Grade 11 Français, as well as the Grade 10 ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment. The fourth chapter contains a brief description of pan-Canadian and international assessments in addition to results showing how New Brunswick matches up against the other Canadian provinces and the OECD member countries on these assessments. Any comments likely to make this report more informative and complete should be sent to the following address: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development Francophone Assessment and Evaluation Branch P.O. Box 6000 Fredericton, N.B. E3B 5H1

T

Table of Contents

iii

TTaabbllee ooff CCoonntteennttss IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn......................................................................................................................... i

CChhaapptteerr 11 PPrroovviinncciiaall EEvvaalluuaattiioonn PPrrooggrraamm aatt tthhee EElleemmeennttaarryy aanndd HHiigghh SScchhooooll LLeevveellss

Why is there a provincial evaluation program in New Brunswick schools?............. 1 What subjects were tested? ................................................................................... 1

How are the exams prepared? ............................................................................... 1

How are the exams administered? ......................................................................... 2

How is exam marking coordinated? ....................................................................... 2

How are the exams marked? ................................................................................. 2

Are there any precautions to bear in mind when interpreting the results? .............. 2

How are the exams followed up? ........................................................................... 3

CChhaapptteerr 22 PPrroovviinncciiaall EElleemmeennttaarryy SScchhooooll EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss

Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary School Level...................... 5

What is the purpose of these exams? ........................................................ 5

What is tested? .......................................................................................... 5

CChhaapptteerr 33 PPrroovviinncciiaall HHiigghh SScchhooooll EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss

Provincial Evaluation Program at the High School Level ............................... 67

What is the purpose of these exams? ...................................................... 67

What is the passing grade? ...................................................................... 67

Table of Contents

iv

CChhaapptteerr 44 RReessuullttss ooff PPaann--CCaannaaddiiaann aanndd IInntteerrnnaattiioonnaall AAsssseessssmmeennttss

Pan-Canadian (PCAP/SAIP) and International (PISA)

Assessment Programs ................................................................................... 117

What are SAIP and PCAP? .................................................................... 117

Why did CMEC develop SAIP and PCAP? ............................................. 117

Why did CMEC replace SAIP with PCAP? ............................................. 118

What is PISA?......................................................................................... 118

Who participates in PISA? ...................................................................... 118

How are students selected? (PISA) ........................................................ 119

How is the information used? (PISA) ...................................................... 119

CCoonncclluussiioonn ....................................................................................................................... 143

Chapter 1 ‐ Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary and High School Levels

Chapter 1

Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary and High School Levels

Why is there a provincial evaluation program in New Brunswick schools?

For a number of years now, New Brunswickhas been looking more closely at theeducation system and its performance. Areschools preparing students to becomecommitted, productive, and responsiblecitizens? Will students be ready to meet thechallenges of the 21st century? These are

What subjects were tested?

All the results presented in this document arefrom the 14 provincial examinationsadministered from kindergarten to Grade 12 inthe 2009-2010 school year. The subjectstested were as follows:

- Grades 2 and 4 Literacy;- Grades 3, 5, and 8 Mathématiques;

1

Chapter 1

Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary and High School Levels

Why is there a provincial evaluation program in New Brunswick schools?

For a number of years now, New Brunswickhas been looking more closely at theeducation system and its performance. Areschools preparing students to becomecommitted, productive, and responsiblecitizens? Will students be ready to meet thechallenges of the 21st century? These arequestions being asked by parents, othereducation stakeholders, and New Brunswicktaxpayers as a whole.

To answer these questions, a provincialevaluation program was set up to assessstudents’ skills in literacy, mathematics, andscience and technology at key stages in theeducation system.

The provincial evaluations are also used toassess studies for the purpose of awardingthe high school diploma.

What subjects were tested?

All the results presented in this document arefrom the 14 provincial examinationsadministered from kindergarten to Grade 12 inthe 2009-2010 school year. The subjectstested were as follows:

- Grades 2 and 4 Literacy;- Grades 3, 5, and 8 Mathématiques;- Grades 5 and 8 Français;- Grades 5 and 8 Sciences &

technologies;- Grade10 ESL;- Grade 11 Mathématiques (regularand modified; and

- Grade 11 Français (regular and modified).

How are the exams prepared?

The provincial examinations are developedtogether with teaching staff. Supervision isprovided by provincial evaluation consultantsin association with the provincial and districtcurriculum officers concerned. The theoreticalfoundations and nature of the exams aredefined in the assessment framework for eachsubject.

Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary and High School Levels ‐ Chapter 1

How are the exams administered?

The rules and procedures to be followed inorder to ensure uniform administration of theexams are set out in an administration guide,which is updated and distributed to theschools for each exam session. TheFrancophone Assessment and EvaluationBranch is responsible for coordinating andadministering the exams .

How is exam marking coordinated?

For each subject tested, head markers aretrained beforehand to oversee the use of themarking grids and ensure uniform scoringprovince-wide. Marking is coordinated byprovincial evaluation consultants incooperation with provincial curriculum officers.

Are there any precautions to bear in mind when interpreting the results?

When comparing averages for a given subject,we must take into account the measurementerror associated with each score before wecan claim there is a difference between twoaverages. Using the standard error, a range(confidence interval) is established, withinwhich the true value of the average is locatedin 95% of cases. The 95% confidence intervalused in this report is calculated by adding twostandard errors on each side of the average.The difference between the averages of twoschools is said to be significant if theirconfidence intervals do not overlap.

In reviewing the provincial examination resultsat the high school level, it should be noted thatstudents enrolled in regular-level courses writeone set of exams, while those enrolled in

2

How are the exams marked?

Once the exams have been administered, thehigh school students’ booklets are sent tothree marking centres located in Shediac,Edmundston, and Bathurst. The elementaryschool students’ booklets are sent to a singlemarking centre at either the Moncton orEdmundston campus of the Université deMoncton. The constructed-response questionsare marked by teaching staff under thecoordination of the head markers (teachers ordistrict supervisors), who are trained by theprovincial evaluation consultants. Theselected-response questions are markedelectronically .

gone set of exams, while those enrolled inmodified-level courses write another.Interestingly, in schools having a largepercentage of students enrolled at the regularlevel, the results are often better than, or atleast comparable with, those of other schoolsfor both the regular- and modified-levelexams. This makes it very important toconsider the percentage of students enrolledat each level.

We must bear in mind as well that provincialexam marks and school marks are only two ofmany factors indicating a school’s overallsituation. Socioeconomic conditions,demographics, what is expected of students,and parental involvement also influencestudent performance. This report does nottake the latter factors into account.

Chapter 1 ‐ Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary and High School Levels

How are the exams followed up?

At the high school level, a statistical reportbreaking down the results by skill and contentis published after each exam session. Itcontains a description of the school resultsand the provincial average for each subject.This statistical report is available in PDFformat at the following Web address :

http://www.gnb.ca/education/francophone-f.asp#1

The school districts, together with the schooladministrators and teaching staff, areresponsible for interpreting the results anddeveloping an education plan. The statisticsare reviewed at the provincial level to aid indecision making regarding curricula.

3

Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary and High School Levels ‐ Chapter 1

4

Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results

Chapter 2

Provincial Elementary School Examination Results

Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary School Level

What is the purpose of these exams?

The provincial evaluation program at theelementary school level has a very specificobjective: to use the information obtained fromthe exams to determine whether or not

What is tested?

The exams are developed on the basis of a list of topics drawn up by school district personnel and Department consultants. The topics are derived from the provincial curricula and identify the elements essential for further

5

Chapter 2

Provincial Elementary School Examination Results

Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary School Level


The provincial evaluation program at theelementary school level has a very specificobjective: to use the information obtained fromthe exams to determine whether or notstudents have mastered the skills and abilitiesassociated with the curricula being evaluated.

Using the results, teaching staff and schooladministrators can develop and applyappropriate action strategies for correctingweaknesses noted among students, and canguide students in a review of what they havelearned.

The results are also analyzed by the schoolsand school districts and the Department ofEducation.

What is tested?

The exams are developed on the basis of a list of topics drawn up by school district personnel and Department consultants. The topics are derived from the provincial curricula and identify the elements essential for further development of skills in Grades 5 and 8 Sciences et technologies, in Grades 3, 5, and 8 Mathématiques, and in Grades 5 and 8 Français.

At the end of Grade 2, reading comprehensionis evaluated at the provincial level. This examconsists of a reading comprehension test andan oral reading test. Reading comprehensionis also evaluated at the beginning of Grade 4.

Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2

Grade 2 provincial literacy exam, percentage of students having achieved level 3 or 4

Description of performance levels for the Grade 2 literacy exam

Level 1 – The student has significant difficulty in reading.

Level 2 – The student will be able to:read and understand straightforward, illustrated texts geared to his/her level; read variousfamiliar words, e.g., cat, dog, happy, give; break down words into their constituent sounds,e.g., teach-er, pa-per; read various words made up of complex sounds, e.g., neighbour,bread; explain how he/she tackles new words when reading; read while making mistakesthat do not change the meaning of a text; retell what he/she has read and give additionaldetails when asked questions; identify the main characters and events.

Level 3* – The student will be able to:d d d t d ill t t d t t d t hi /h l l d f f ili d

6

Level 3 – The student will be able to:read and understand illustrated texts geared to his/her level; read a range of familiar words,e.g., eyes, red, morning, reading; read words made up of complex sounds, e.g., friend, said,would; explain how he/she tackles new words when reading; find the meaning of a wordbased on the context; read fluently and observe punctuation marks; retell what he/she hasread and describe most of the events of the story; describe the characters, the centralproblem, and how the problem is solved; find answers to questions using clues contained inthe text.

Level 4 – The student will be able to:read and understand texts geared to his/her level, with or without picture support; explain the varioustechniques he/she uses to read words; find the meaning of a word based on the context; readfluently and observe punctuation marks so as to read expressively; retell what he/she has read anddescribe the main events of the story; describe the characters, the central problem, and how theproblem is solved; find answers to questions using clues given in the text or by drawing on personalexperiences or even by making generalizations extending beyond the content of the text.

* By the end of Grade 2, students are expected to have attained Level 3.


Chart 1

District 01 n= 657

District 03 n= 412

District 05 n= 344

District 09 n= 429

District 11 n= 368

Province n= 2210

Chart 2

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy assessment at Grade 2 by District, Including the Province

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 2

Number of students who

wrote the exam

District 01

Grade 2

Literacy

74 75 74 71 73 737579 81

7673

77

0

20

40

60

80

100

District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province

Percentages

Reading Comprehension Oral Reading

target

S l d

Des Bâtisseurs n= 100

Arc‐en‐ciel n= 22

Saint‐Henri n= 74

Sainte‐Bernadette n= 22

Amirault n= 172

Abbey‐Landry n= 42

Sainte‐Thérèse n= 68

Champlain n= 102

District 01 n= 657

Province n= 2210

7


wrote the exam

n= 55Samuel‐de‐

Champlain

73

74

75

71

79

82

41

61

73

75

76

77

75

76

78

74

85

41

51

73

75

85

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Champlain

Sainte‐Thérèse

Abbey‐Landry

Amirault

Sainte‐Bernadette

Saint‐Henri

Arc‐en‐ciel

Des Bâtisseurs

Samuel‐de‐Champlain

Percentages

Oral Reading Reading Comprehension

target


Chart 3

Ernest‐Lang * n= 5

Sainte‐Anne n= 15

Saint‐Joseph n= 13


Grade 2

Literacy

Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerollen= 12

Centre d'appren‐

tissage du Haut‐

Madawaska

Carrefour de la

Jeunessen= 36

Régionale

Saint‐Basilen= 27


wrote the exam

District 03

n= 20

65

72

69

85

59

92

73

80

78

65

61

78

85

100

78

100

67

80

86

G d i iè

Élémentaire Sacré‐Coeur

Notre‐Dame

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph

Régionale Saint‐Basile

Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle

Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang *

Centre d'apprentissage du Haut‐Madawaska

Carrefour de la Jeunesse

Saint‐Jacques n= 39

Notre‐Dame n= 46

Grande‐Rivière n= 27

Mgr‐Lang n= 19

Marie‐Immaculée n= 30

Echo Jeunesse n= 31

Mgr‐Martin n= 41

District 03 n= 412

Province n= 2210

8

n= 31

n= 20

Élémentaire

Sacré‐Coeur

Régional de

Saint‐André

73

75

93

71

80

84

70

70

65

77

79

80

77

90

74

75

65

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Mgr‐Martin

Echo Jeunesse

Marie‐Immaculée

Mgr‐Lang

Régional de Saint‐André

Grande‐Rivière

Percentages


target

* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.


Chart 4

Cité‐de‐l'Amitié n= 64

n= 39

Le Tournesol n= 49

Séjour‐Jeunesse * n= 4


Grade 2

Literacy

La Découverte‐de‐

Saint‐Sauveurn= 6

Carrefour‐

Étudiantn= 30

François‐Xavier‐

Daiglen= 13

La Croisée

Académie

Assomptionn= 14


wrote the exam

District 05

59

80

93

69

59

54

77

50

91

59

90

86

76

79

92

77

83

86

Mgr‐Melanson

Apollo‐XI

Académie Assomption

Séjour‐Jeunesse *

Le Tournesol

La Croisée

François‐Xavier‐Daigle

Carrefour‐Étudiant

La Découverte‐de‐Saint‐Sauveur

Cité‐de‐l'Amitié

Apollo‐XI n= 40

Mgr‐Melanson n= 17

Versant‐Nord n= 17

Le Coin‐des‐Amis n= 6

Arthur‐Pinet n= 7

District 05 n= 344

Province n= 2210

9

n= 20

n= 18Académie

Notre‐Dame

Domaine‐des‐

Copains

73

74

50

43

67

83

88

59

77

81

75

86

67

89

88

59

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05

Domaine‐des‐Copains

Arthur‐Pinet

Le Coin‐des‐Amis

Académie Notre‐Dame

Versant‐Nord

Mgr‐Melanson

Percentages


target



Chart 5

La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 10

Centre la fontaine n= 23

René‐Chouinard n= 13

L'Amitié n= 21

La Source n= 34

La Ruche n= 64

La Passerelle n= 26

L'Envolée n= 47

L'Étincelle n= 15

La‐Rivière n= 12


Grade 2

Literacy

District 09


wrote the exam

La Relève‐de‐

Saint‐Isidoren= 23

50

87

79

61

69

67

76

52

38

65

70

75

87

89

83

81

67

91

38

62

65

60

La‐Rivière

L'Étincelle

L'Envolée

La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore

La Passerelle

La Ruche

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine

La Villa‐des‐Amis

Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 22

Le Maillon n= 13

Ola‐léger n= 17

Province n= 2210

District 09 n= 429

10

Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandren= 33

n= 10

Marguerite‐

Bourgeoysn= 46

L'Escale‐des‐

Jeunes

73

71

59

60

77

89

77

82

50

77

76

53

60

100

83

73

88

75

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09

Ola‐léger

L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes

Le Maillon

Marguerite‐Bourgeoys

Terre‐des‐Jeunes

Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre

La‐Rivière

Percentages


target


Chart 6

Le Soleil‐Levant n= 44

W‐F‐Boisvert n= 16

Grande‐Digue n= 23

Donat‐Robichaud n= 24


La Marée‐

Montanten= 29

Régionale‐de‐

Baie‐Sainte‐Annen= 17

Père‐Edgar‐

T.‐LeBlanc

Grade 2

Literacy

District 11

Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 20


wrote the exam

n= 30

80

63

63

88

78

88

75

77

62

95

60

70

70

67

87

82

69

80

66

85

Mont‐Carmel

Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois

Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc

Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue

Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne

W‐F‐Boisvert

Le Soleil‐Levant

La Marée‐Montante

Carrefour‐Beausoleil

Mont‐Carmel n= 15

Camille‐Vautour n= 23

Saint‐Paul n= 6

Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 12

Notre‐Dame n= 11

District 11 n= 368

Province n= 2210

Blanche‐

Bourgeoisn= 16

Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaudn= 28

11

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeoisn= 54

73

73

82

75

64

75

33

61

80

77

73

93

75

36

75

67

52

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11

Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud

Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame

Calixte‐F.‐Savoie

Saint‐Paul

Camille‐Vautour

Mont Carmel

Percentages


target


Percentage of students having passed the provincial Grade 3 Mathématiques exam

12


Chart 7

District 01 n= 586

District 03 n= 434

District 05 n= 333

District 09 n= 409

District 11 n= 374

Province n= 2136

Chart 8

Grade 3

Mathématiques

Percentage of Students Having Passed the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam by District, Including the Province


wrote the exam

District 01

Percentage of Students Having Passed the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam

7570 68

7267

71

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

target



Anna Malenfant n= 105

Saint‐Henri n= 75


Amirault n= 39


Sainte‐Thérèse n= 57

Champlain n= 93

District 01 n= 586

Province n= 2136


wrote the exam

Samuel‐de‐

Champlainn= 46

13

71

75

48

63

76

72

95

83

87

68

80

87

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Champlain

Sainte‐Thérèse

Abbey‐Landry

Amirault

Sainte‐Bernadette

Saint‐Henri

Anna Malenfant

Arc‐en‐ciel

Des Bâtisseurs


Percentages

target


Chart 9

Ernest‐Lang n= 9

Sainte‐Anne n= 13


Grade 3

Mathématiques

District 03 Percentage of Students Having Passed the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam


wrote the exam

Carrefour de la

Jeunessen= 42

Centre d'appren‐

tissage du Haut‐

Madawaska

n= 28

Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerollen= 11

Régionale

Saint‐Basilen= 22

82

53

65

91

77

82

85

56

79

64


Notre‐Dame

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph



Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang




Notre‐Dame n= 51


Mgr‐Lang n= 23


Echo Jeunesse n= 28

Mgr‐Martin n= 37

District 03 n= 434

Province n= 2136

Élémentaire

Sacré‐Coeurn= 38

Régional de

Saint‐Andrén= 18

14

71

70

76

79

94

61

44

50

82

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Mgr‐Martin

Echo Jeunesse

Marie‐Immaculée

Mgr‐Lang


Grande‐Rivière


Percentages

target


Chart 10

n= 57

n= 28

n= 48

n= 1

Carrefour‐Étudiant n= 39


Daiglen= 15

Académie

Assomptionn= 16

La Croisée

Le Tournesol



wrote the exam


Saint‐Sauveurn= 8

Grade 3

Mathématiques

District 05


Percentage of Students Having Passed the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam

79

67

100

54

50

93

54

88

75

M M l

Apollo‐XI



Le Tournesol

La Croisée





n= 36

n= 14

n= 16

n= 10

n= 6

District 05 n= 333

Province n= 2136

Mgr‐Melanson

Versant‐Nord

Arthur‐Pinet

Académie Notre‐

Damen= 23


Apollo‐XI

Domaine‐des‐

Copainsn= 16

15


71

68

81

83

50

52

88

79

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05


Arthur‐Pinet



Versant‐Nord

Mgr‐Melanson

Percentages

target


Chart 11




L'Amitié n= 22

La Source n= 36

La Ruche n= 54

La Passerelle n= 23

L'Envolée n= 45

L'Étincelle n= 18

La‐Rivière n= 12

n= 20La Relève‐de‐

Saint‐Isidore

Grade 3

Mathématiques



wrote the exam

75

61

67

70

74

72

67

73

78

75

67

La‐Rivière

L'Étincelle

L'Envolée


La Passerelle

La Ruche

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine



Le Maillon n= 13

Ola‐léger n= 13

District 09 n= 409

Province n= 2136

n= 41

L'Escale‐des‐

Jeunes

Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandre

16

n= 29

Marguerite‐

Bourgeoys

n= 16

71

72

69

88

100

88

68

55

75

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09

Ola‐léger


Le Maillon




La‐Rivière

Percentages

target


Chart 12





Régionale‐de‐

Baie‐Sainte‐Annen= 19

Père‐Edgar‐

T.‐LeBlancn= 26


wrote the exam

Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 19

La Marée‐

Montanten= 48

Grade 3

Mathématiques


91

81

58

68

89

84

47

53

52

84

Mont‐Carmel



Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue


W‐F‐Boisvert

Le Soleil‐Levant



Mont‐Carmel n= 11


Saint‐Paul n= 6


Notre‐Dame n= 12

District 11 n= 374

Province n= 2136

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeoisn= 57

Blanche‐

Bourgeoisn= 18

Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaudn= 19

17

71

67

42

56

92

83

67

57

91

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame


Saint‐Paul

Camille‐Vautour

Mont‐Carmel

Percentages

target


Provincial Grade 4 Literacy exam,percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher, by school, including the districts and province

Description of performance levels for the Grade 4 literacy exam

Level 1 – The student has significant difficulty in reading.

Level 2 – The student will be able to:find the meaning of certain words or expressions from the context; retrieve certain explicitinformation and combine information according to a proposed structure; identify the subjectof the text and most of the important information; make certain predictions when theinformation is explicit; provide meaning for certain substitution words; identify the structuralelements of the text; reconstruct the chronological order of certain events of the story; makeconnections between the different parts of the text and relate some ideas to personalexperiences; make inferences clearly suggested by the text but will sometimes have troublejustifying them; respond to the text with personal experiences.

Level 3* – The student will be able to:find the meaning of most of the words and expressions from the context; retrieve most of theexplicit information select various relevant pieces of information and combine them

18

find the meaning of most of the words and expressions from the context; retrieve most of theexplicit information, select various relevant pieces of information and combine themaccording to a proposed structure; identify the important information and the main idea;make accurate predictions when the information is explicit and certain predictions when theinformation is implicit; provide meaning for various substitution words and some linkingwords; use indices to guide understanding and interpret certain elements of pictorialrepresentation; reconstruct the chronological order and most of the events of the story;make connections between the different parts of the text and relate most of the ideas topersonal experiences; make inferences and justify them most of the time; respond to thetext based on the content and personal experiences

Level 4 – The student will be able to:find the meaning of the words and expressions from the context; retrieve explicitinformation, select the relevant information and put it together according to a proposedstructure; identify certain secondary ideas; make accurate predictions when the informationis implicit and adjust them as needed; provide meaning for substitution words and manylinking words; interpret pictorial representations; reconstruct the chronological order of theevents of the story; make connections between the different parts of the text and relate theideas to situations in everyday life and other texts; make inferences and justify them with thetext while formulating opinions.

* At the beginning of Grade 4, students are expected to have attained Level 3.


19


Chart 13

District 01 n= 586

District 03 n= 417

District 05 n= 374

District 09 n= 472

District 11 n= 370

Province n= 2219

Chart 14

District 01

Grade 4

Literacy

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 4 by District, Including the Province


wrote the exam

Percentage of students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 4

58 59 59 58

42

56

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

target



Anna Malenfant n= 176

Saint‐Henri n= 77



Champlain n= 80

District 01 n= 586

Province n= 2219


wrote the exam

Samuel‐de‐

Champlainn= 68

20

56

58

65

44

53

58

66

27

57

50

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Champlain

Abbey‐Landry

Sainte‐Bernadette

Saint‐Henri

Anna Malenfant

Arc‐en‐ciel

Des Bâtisseurs


Percentages

target


Chart 15

Ernest‐Lang n= 14

Sainte‐Anne n= 17


n= 8

Régionale Saint‐

Basilen= 28


wrote the exam

Carrefour de la

Jeunessen= 42

Centre

d'apprentissage du

Haut‐Madawaska

n= 19

Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerolle

District 03 Percentage of students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 4

Grade 4

Literacy

60

66

62

76

75

75

53

64

53

52


Notre‐Dame

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph



Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang




Notre‐Dame n= 47


Mgr‐Lang n= 30


Echo Jeunesse n= 22

Mgr‐Martin n= 35

District 03 n= 417

Province n= 2219

Régional de Saint‐

Andrén= 15

Élémentaire Sacré‐

Coeurn= 30

21

56

59

74

73

50

30

47

30

60

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Mgr‐Martin

Echo Jeunesse

Marie‐Immaculée

Mgr‐Lang


Grande‐Rivière


Percentages

target


Chart 16

Cité‐de‐l'Amitié n= 57

n= 38

Séjour‐Jeunesse n= 7

Grade 4

Literacy

District 05


wrote the exam


Saint‐Sauveurn= 10

Le Domaine‐

Étudiantn= 58



Daiglen= 17

La Croisée

Académie n= 13


68

76

54

71

47

47

60

45

80

49

M M l

Apollo‐XI


Séjour‐Jeunesse

La Croisée



Le Domaine‐Étudiant



n= 38



n= 10

Arthur‐Pinet n= 11

District 05 n= 374

Province n= 2219

Domaine‐des‐

Copainsn= 16

22

Apollo‐XI

Académie Notre‐

Damen= 25

Assomptionn= 13


56

59

81

55

50

72

70

68

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05


Arthur‐Pinet



Versant‐Nord

Mgr‐Melanson

Percentages

target


Chart 17




L'Amitié n= 28

La Source n= 41

La Ruche n= 81

La Passerelle n= 24

L'Envolée n= 54

L'Étincelle n= 12

La‐Rivière n= 11

District 09 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 4


wrote the exam

La Relève‐de‐Saint‐

Isidoren= 18

Grade 4

Literacy

64

75

48

50

63

59

46

54

76

29

25

La‐Rivière

L'Étincelle

L'Envolée


La Passerelle

La Ruche

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine



Le Maillon n= 12

Ola‐léger n= 12

District 09 n= 472

Province n= 2219

L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes n= 13

23

Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandren= 33

Marguerite‐

Bourgeoysn= 41

56

58

75

54

83

73

75

70

64

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09

Ola‐léger


Le Maillon




La‐Rivière

Percentages

target


Chart 18





n= 15

Père‐Edgar‐T.‐

LeBlancn= 39

Grade 4

Literacy

District 11

Régionale‐de‐Baie‐

Sainte‐Anne



wrote the exam

Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 22

La Marée‐

Montanten= 34

46

44

54

42

60

20

38

25

35

41

Mont‐Carmel



Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue


W‐F‐Boisvert

Le Soleil‐Levant



Mont‐Carmel n= 13


Saint‐Paul* n= 3


Notre‐Dame n= 12

District 11 n= 370

Province n= 2219

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeoisn= 36

Blanche‐Bourgeois n= 15

Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaudn= 40

24

56

42

50

40

42

63

42

46

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame


Saint‐Paul*

Camille‐Vautour

Mont‐Carmel

Percentages

target



Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Sciences et technologies exam, by school, including the districts and province

25


Chart 19

District 01 n= 557

District 03 n= 453

District 05 n= 361

District 09 n= 475

District 11 n= 390

Province n= 2236

Chart 20

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et technologies Exam by School,

Including the Districts and Province

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et technologies Exam

District 01


wrote the exam

Grade 5

Sciences et

technologies

84

7378

72 7376

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

target

87Samuel‐de‐Champlain



Anna‐Malenfant n= 196

Saint‐Henri n= 60



Champlain n= 95

District 01 n= 557

Province n= 2236

Samuel‐de‐

Champlain

26


wrote the exam

n= 38

76

84

79

77

96

80

88

84

81

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Champlain

Abbey‐Landry

Sainte‐Bernadette

Saint‐Henri

Anna Malenfant

Arc‐en‐ciel

Des Bâtisseurs

Champlain

Pourcentages

target


Chart 21

Ernest‐Lang n= 12

Sainte‐Anne n= 16


District 03

Carrefour de la

Jeunesse

Grade 5

Sciences et

technologies

Centre d'apprentis‐

sage du Haut‐

Madawaska

n= 27


wrote the exam

n= 38

Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerollen= 14

Régionale n= 24

68

59

57

75

57

94

75

59

87

Notre‐Dame

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph



Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang





Notre‐Dame n= 57


Mgr‐Lang n= 28


Echo Jeunesse n= 27

Mgr‐Martin n= 43

District 03 n= 73

Province n= 76

27

Régional de

Saint‐Andrén= 17

Saint‐Basilen= 24

Élémentaire

Sacré‐Coeurn= 38

76

73

93

74

68

86

29

78

74

68

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Mgr‐Martin

Echo Jeunesse

Marie‐Immaculée

Mgr‐Lang


Grande‐Rivière


Notre‐Dame

Percentages

target


Chart 22


Grade 5

Sciences et

technologies


wrote the exam

District 05



Saint‐Sauveur

n= 70

Le Domaine‐

Étudiant

n= 6


n= 58


Daigle

n= 41

n= 1791

69

59

88

48

67

86


Séjour‐Jeunesse

La Croisée






n= 36

n= 4

n= 26


n= 31

Le Coin‐des‐Amis n= 10

n= 6

N= 361

Province N= 2236

28

La Croisée

Domaine‐des‐

Copainsn= 16

n= 18

Académie

Assomptionn= 11


Arthur‐Pinet

Académie Notre‐

Dame

Apollo‐XI

Versant‐Nord

District 05

76

78

81

67

60

100

97

100

81

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05


Arthur‐Pinet



Versant‐Nord

Mgr‐Melanson

Apollo‐XI

Percentages

target



Chart 23




L'Amitié n= 24

La Source n= 44

La Ruche n= 51

La Passerelle n= 34

L'Envolée n= 35

É


District 09


Isidoren= 16


wrote the exam

Grade 5

Sciences et

technologies

83

81

62

71

80

63

61

70

65

'É ll

L'Envolée


La Passerelle

La Ruche

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine


L'Étincelle n= 24

La‐Rivière n= 10


Ola‐léger n= 13

Léandre‐LeGresley n= 12

District 09 n= 475

Province n= 2236

29

Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandren= 33

Marguerite‐

Bourgeoysn= 48


76

72

100

69

81

81

75

70

40

71

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09

Léandre‐LeGresley

Ola‐léger





La‐Rivière

L'Étincelle

Percentages

target


Chart 24





Grade 5

Sciences et

technologies

Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 21

District 11


wrote the exam


La Marée‐

Montanten= 30


Sainte‐Annen= 18

86

73

74

95

56

71

67

83

100



Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue


W‐F‐Boisvert

Le Soleil‐Levant



Mont‐Carmel n= 11

n= 17

Saint‐Paul n= 10


Notre‐Dame n= 19

District n= 390

Province n= 2236

30

Blanche‐Bourgeois


LeBlancn= 26

n= 19

Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaudn= 32

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeoisn= 58

Camille‐Vautour

76

73

31

63

74

90

70

59

82

86

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame


Saint‐Paul

Camille‐Vautour

Mont‐Carmel


Percentages

target


Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Mathématiques examby school, including the districts and province

31


Chart 25

District 01 n= 554

District 03 n= 452

District 05 n= 360

District 09 n= 468

District 11 n= 388

Province n= 2222

Chart 26

Percentage of Students Aaving Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam by District, Including

the Province

Grade 5

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

District 01

83

74 74

65

74 74

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

target





Saint‐Henri n= 60



Champlain n= 95

District 01 n= 554

Province n= 2222

32


wrote the exam

Samuel‐de‐

Champlainn= 39

74

83

76

69

96

82

88

74

86

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Champlain

Abbey‐Landry

Sainte‐Bernadette

Saint‐Henri

Anna Malenfant

Arc‐en‐ciel

Des Bâtisseurs

Champlain

Percentages

target


Chart 27

Ernest‐Lang n= 12

Sainte‐Anne n= 15



sage du Haut‐

Madawaska

n= 27

Carrefour de la

Jeunesse

n= 14

Régionale Saint‐

Basilen= 24

Grade 5

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

District 03 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam

n= 38

Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerolle

76

74

69

67

79

64

73

75

52

84

Élémentaire Sacré Coeur

Notre‐Dame

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph



Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang




Notre‐Dame n= 57


Mgr‐Lang n= 29


Echo Jeunesse n= 27

Mgr‐Martin n= 43

District 03 n= 452

Province n= 2222

33


Coeurn= 38


Andrén= 17

74

74

95

85

72

76

65

59

76

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Mgr‐Martin

Echo Jeunesse

Marie‐Immaculée

Mgr‐Lang


Grande‐Rivière


Percentages

target


Chart 28

n= 69

n= 35

n= 5

Le Domaine‐

Étudiant


Saint‐Sauveur


Daigle

n= 39

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam

n= 6


wrote the exam


Grade 5

Mathématiques

District 05

n= 17


n= 11

n= 59


La Croisée

Académie 96

64

71

59

87

41

67

77

Apollo‐XI


Séjour‐Jeunesse

La Croisée






n= 26


n= 31

n= 10

Arthur‐Pinet n= 6

District 05 n= 360

Province n= 2222

Académie Notre‐

Dame

n= 11

n= 18

Apollo‐XI

Domaine‐des‐

Copainsn= 16

Assomption

Versant‐Nord


34

74

74

81

67

100

83

90

100

96

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05


Arthur‐Pinet



Versant‐Nord

Mgr‐Melanson

Apollo‐XI

Percentages

target



Chart 29




L'Amitié n= 24

La Source n= 45

La Ruche n= 51

La Passerelle n= 33

L'Envolée n= 35

L'Étincelle n= 24

La‐Rivière n= 11

Grade 5

Mathématiques

District 09


wrote the exam


Isidoren= 15


71

74

73

39

65

69

50

68

80

59

L'Étincelle

L'Envolée


La Passerelle

La Ruche

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine


Ola‐léger n= 13


District 09 n= 468

Province n= 2222

Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandren= 32

35

n= 41



Marguerite‐

Bourgeoys

74

65

75

69

81

68

75

53

27

71

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09


Ola‐léger





La‐Rivière

L Étincelle

Percentages

target


Chart 30





wrote the exam

n= 19


Mathématiques

5e année

District 11


Sainte‐Anne

Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 21


Père‐Edgar‐T.‐n= 26

La Marée‐

Montanten= 30

82

84

69

73

95

58

60

70

83

100

Mont Carmel



Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue


W‐F‐Boisvert

Le Soleil‐Levant



Mont‐Carmel n= 11


Saint‐Paul n= 10


Notre‐Dame n= 19

District 11 n= 388

Province n= 2222


n= 32Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaud

36

LeBlancn= 26

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeoisn= 57

74

74

38

74

74

90

90

65

82

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame


Saint‐Paul

Camille‐Vautour

Mont‐Carmel

Percentages

target


Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Français exam by school, including the districts and province

37


Chart 31

District 01 n= 553

District 03 n= 453

District 05 n= 362

District 09 n= 469

District 11 n= 390

Province n= 2227

Chart 32

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Français Exam

Grade 5

Français

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Français Exam by District, Including the

Province


wrote the exam

District 01

76 74 73

62 6470

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

target





Saint‐Henri n= 59



Champlain n= 94

District 01 n= 553

Province n= 2227


wrote the exam

Samuel‐de‐

Champlainn= 37

38

70

76

71

59

92

71

79

79

83

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Champlain

Abbey‐Landry

Sainte‐Bernadette

Saint‐Henri

Anna Malenfant

Arc‐en‐ciel

Des Bâtisseurs

Champlain

Percentages

target


Chart 33

Ernest‐Lang n= 11

Sainte‐Anne n= 16



wrote the exam

Carrefour de la

Jeunessen= 38


sage du Haut‐

Madawaska

n= 27

Grade 5

Français

District 03 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Français Exam

Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerollen= 14

Régionale Saint‐

Basilen= 24

63

74

73

69

92

71

69

100

63

68

Élémentaire Sacré Coeur

Notre‐Dame

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph



Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang




Notre‐Dame n= 58


Mgr‐Lang n= 30


Echo Jeunesse n= 27

Mgr‐Martin n= 43

District 03 n= 453

Province n= 2227


Coeurn= 38


Andrén= 17

39

70

74

91

67

56

70

88

87

63

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Mgr‐Martin

Echo Jeunesse

Marie‐Immaculée

Mgr‐Lang


Grande‐Rivière


Percentages

target


Chart 34

n= 68

n= 36

n= 4

Académie n= 12

n= 18

Séjour‐Jeunesse*


District 05

Grade 5

Français



Daigle


wrote the exam



Saint‐Sauveurn= 6

n= 57Le Domaine‐

Étudiant

La Croisée

92

67

72

56

81

61

67

66

Apollo‐XI


Séjour‐Jeunesse

La Croisée






n= 25


n= 31

n= 10

Arthur‐Pinet n= 6

District 05 n= 362

Province n= 2227

Apollo‐XI

Assomptionn= 12

40

Domaine‐des‐

Copains

Versant‐Nord

n= 17

Académie Notre‐

Damen= 18


70

73

88

33

90

100

77

100

92

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05


Arthur‐Pinet



Versant‐Nord

Mgr‐Melanson

Apollo‐XI

Percentages

target



Chart 35




L'Amitié n= 23

La Source n= 44

La Ruche n= 52

La Passerelle n= 33

L'Envolée n= 35

L'Étincelle n= 24

La‐Rivière n= 11


wrote the exam


Isidoren= 16

Grade 5

Français


71

63

75

42

54

70

57

52

55

47

L'Étincelle

L'Envolée


La Passerelle

La Ruche

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine


Ola‐léger n= 13


District 09 n= 469

Province n= 2227

n= 32


41

Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandre

n= 23

Marguerite‐

Bourgeoysn= 45


70

62

92

69

71

71

83

63

45

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09


Ola‐léger





La‐Rivière

Percentages

target


Chart 36





wrote the exam

n= 19



Grade 5

Français

District 11


Sainte‐Anne


Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 21

La Marée‐

Montanten= 30

64

71

69

65

68

71

54

60

73

95

Mont Carmel



Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue


W‐F‐Boisvert

Le Soleil‐Levant



Mont‐Carmel n= 11


Saint‐Paul n= 10


Notre‐Dame n= 19

District 11 n= 388

Province n= 2222

42

n= 57

Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaudn= 32

LeBlancn= 26

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeois


70

64

21

79

68

60

60

65

64

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame


Saint‐Paul

Camille‐Vautour

Mont‐Carmel

Percentages

target


Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 8 Sciences et technologies exam by school, including the districts and province

43


Chart 37

District 01 n= 517

District 03 n= 416

District 05 n= 356

District 09 n= 454

District 11 n= 416

Province n= 2159

Chart 38

Grade 8

Sciences et

technologies


wrote the exam

District 01 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Sciences et technologies Exam

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Sciences et technologies Exam by District,

Including the Province

72

62

52

6155

61

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

target


Sainte‐Anne n= 83


Le Mascaret n= 180


District 01 n= 517

Province n= 2159

Carrefour de

l'Acadien= 167


wrote the exam

Samuel‐de‐

Champlainn= 40

44

61

72

63

61

78

87

86

78

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Abbey‐Landry

Le Mascaret

Carrefour de l'Acadie

Arc‐en‐ciel

Sainte‐Anne

Champlain

Percentages

target


Chart 39

Ernest‐Lang n= 7

Sainte‐Anne n= 22

Régionale Saint‐


Carrefour de la

Jeunessen= 38

Centre

d'apprentissage du

Haut‐Madawaska

n= 19

Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerollen= 13

n= 21

Grade 8

Sciences et

technologies

District 03


wrote the exam

40

71

46

50

71

100

79

Saint‐Joseph



Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang





Notre‐Dame n= 49


Marie‐Gaétane n= 35

District 03 n= 416

Province n= 2159

Basile

A.‐J.‐Savoie n= 43

45

n= 21

Thomas‐Albert n= 94

61

62

66

79

47

51

63

50

40

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Marie‐Gaétane

A.‐J.‐Savoie

Grande‐Rivière

Thomas‐Albert

Notre‐Dame

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph

Percentages

target


Chart 40

N= 73

N= 37

N= 6

N= 39Roland‐Pépin


Carrefour‐Étudiant N= 39


DaigleN= 16

Place‐des‐Jeunes

Grade 8

Sciences et

technologies


wrote the exam

Le Domaine‐

ÉtudiantN= 51

La Croisée

Séjour‐Jeunesse

83

38

69

44

37

68

Séjour‐Jeunesse

La Croisée





N= 35

Arthur‐Pinet N= 21

District 05 N= 356

N= 2159

Domaine‐des‐

CopainsN= 17

46

Province

Académie Notre‐

DameN= 22

Versant‐Nord

61

52

35

24

36

63

74

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05


Arthur‐Pinet


Versant‐Nord

Roland‐Pépin

Percentages

target


Chart 41

n= 14

n= 24

n= 12

n= 23

n= 28

n= 54

n= 27

L'Envolée n= 56

É

Grade 8

Sciences et

technologies



wrote the exam

La Relève‐de‐

Saint‐Isidoren= 20

La Source

La Ruche

La Passerelle

L'Amitié


Centre la fontaine

René‐Chouinard

50

56

80

68

52

25

42

57


La Passerelle

Le Tremplin

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine


L'Étincelle n= 24

La‐Rivière n= 6


Ola‐léger n= 21


District 09 n= 454

Province n= 2159

47

n= 24


Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandre

n= 14

Marguerite‐

Bourgeoysn= 61

61

61

79

62

71

66

69

54

50

83

45

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09


Ola‐léger





La‐Rivière

L'Étincelle

L'Envolée

Percentages

target


Chart 42


Secondaire Assompt n= 22




La Marée‐

Montanten= 31


Sainte‐Annen= 26

Grade 8

Sciences et

technologies

District 11


wrote the exam

Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 13

33

33

70

88

59

94

32

100


Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue


Secondaire Assomption

Le Soleil‐Levant



Mont‐Carmel n= 17

Saint‐Paul n= 11


Notre‐Dame n= 18

District 11 n= 416

Province n= 2159

Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaudn= 34


48


LeBlancn= 33

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeoisn= 70


61

55

18

56

39

69

91

40

59

56

33

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame


Saint‐Paul

Camille‐Vautour

Mont‐Carmel



Percentages

target


Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 8 Mathématiques exam by school, including the districts and province

49


Chart 43

District 01 n= 515

District 03 n= 415

District 05 n= 363

District 09 n= 449

District 11 n= 412

Province n= 2154

Chart 44


wrote the exam

District 01

Grade 8

Mathématiques

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam by District, Including

the Province


7267

4653

47

58

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

target


Sainte‐Anne n= 83


Le Mascaret n= 179


District 01 n= 515

Province n= 2154


wrote the exam

Samuel‐de‐

Champlainn= 39

Carrefour de

l'Acadie

50

n= 167

58

72

78

74

72

73

75

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Abbey‐Landry

Le Mascaret


Arc‐en‐ciel

Sainte‐Anne

Champlain

Percentages

target


Chart 45

Ernest‐Lang n= 7

Sainte‐Anne n= 22

Carrefour de la

Jeunessen= 38

Grade 8

Mathématiques

Régionale Saint‐

Basilen= 21

Centre

d'apprentissage du

Haut‐Madawaska

n= 19


Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerollen= 14

District 03


wrote the exam

39

45

86

43

36

43

95

82

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph

Régionale Saint‐…

Mgr‐Mathieu…

Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang

Centre d'appren…

Carrefour de la …



Notre‐Dame n= 49





District 03 n= 415

Province n= 2154

51

58

67

77

76

68

67

73

39

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Marie‐Gaétane

A.‐J.‐Savoie

Grande‐Rivière

Thomas‐Albert

Notre‐Dame

Saint‐Jacques

Percentages

target


Chart 46

Place‐des‐Jeunes n= 74

Séjour‐Jeunesse n= 6

Roland‐Pépin n= 39


Le Domaine‐

Étudiantn= 54



Daiglen= 16

La Croisée n= 38

District 05


wrote the exam

Grade 8

Mathématiques


51

67

18

44

27

37

65

Roland‐Pépin

Séjour‐Jeunesse

La Croisée






District 05 n= 363

Province n= 2154

Domaine‐des‐

Copainsn= 17

Académie Notre‐

Damen= 22

52

58

46

41

20

68

64

51

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05


Arthur‐Pinet


Versant‐Nord

Roland‐Pépin

Percentages

target


Chart 47




L'Amitié n= 23

La Source n= 28

Le Tremplin n= 53

La Passerelle n= 26

L'Envolée n= 57

L'Étincelle n= 24

La‐Rivière n= 7

Grade 8

Mathématiques


District 09


wrote the exam


Isidoren= 20

71

51

45

38

64

68

52

33

48

50

L'Étincelle

L'Envolée


La Passerelle

Le Tremplin

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine



Ola‐léger n= 21


District 09 n= 449

Province n= 2154

n= 14

Marguerite‐

Bourgeoysn= 59

Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandren= 24


53

58

53

86

62

36

53

56

29

29

71

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09


Ola‐léger





La‐Rivière

L'Étincelle

Percentages

target



Chart 48




Grade 8

Mathématiques


District 11


wrote the exam

La Marée‐

Montanten= 31

Secondaire

Assomptionn= 22


Sainte‐Annen= 26

Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 13


40

45

31

65

31

55

91

23

92



Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue



Le Soleil‐Levant



Mont‐Carmel n= 17


Saint‐Paul n= 10


Notre‐Dame n= 18

District 11 n= 412

Province n= 2154

n= 14

Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaudn= 34

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeoisn= 70

Blanche‐Bourgeois

54

LeBlancn= 33

58

47

15

36

28

77

90

65

59

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame


Saint‐Paul

Camille‐Vautour

Mont‐Carmel

Bourgeois

Percentages

target


Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the Grade 8 Français exam by school, including the districts and province

55


Chart 49

District 01 n= 511

District 03 n= 415

District 05 n= 359

District 09 n= 451

District 11 n= 411

Province n= 2147

Chart 50

Grade 8

Français


wrote the exam

District 01

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Français Exam by District, Including the

Province


7471 70

65 6369

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

target


Sainte‐Anne n= 82


Le Mascaret n= 177


District 01 n= 511

Province n= 2147

56


wrote the exam

Samuel‐de‐

Champlainn= 41

Carrefour de

l'Acadien= 165

69

74

81

71

76

64

79

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 01

Abbey‐Landry

Le Mascaret


Arc‐en‐ciel

Sainte‐Anne

p

Percentages

target


Chart 51

Ernest‐Lang n= 7

Sainte‐Anne n= 22

Mgr‐Mathieu‐

Mazerollen= 14

Régionale Saint‐

Basile

Grade 8

Français

District 03


wrote the exam

Carrefour de la

Jeunessen= 38

Centre

d'apprentissage du

Haut‐Madawaska

n= 19

n= 21


65

65

86

71

59

57

95

71

Saint‐Jacques

Saint‐Joseph

Régionale Saint‐…

Mgr‐Mathieu…

Sainte‐Anne

Ernest‐Lang

Centre d'appren…

Carrefour de la …



Notre‐Dame n= 49





District 03 n= 415

Province n= 2147

57

69

71

69

81

61

59

86

65

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 03

Marie‐Gaétane

A.‐J.‐Savoie

Grande‐Rivière

Thomas‐Albert

Notre‐Dame

Saint‐Jacques

Percentages

target


Chart 52

Place‐des‐Jeunes n= 74

n= 39

Séjour‐Jeunesse* n= 5

Roland‐Pépin n= 37


Le Domaine‐

Étudiantn= 54



Daiglen= 16

Académie Notre‐n= 21


wrote the exam


District 05

La Croisée

Grade 8

Français

86

54

63

69

67

70

Roland‐Pépin

Séjour‐Jeunesse

La Croisée






District 05 n= 359

Province n= 2147

58

Damen= 21

Domaine‐des‐

Copainsn= 18

69

70

89

45

57

86

86

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 05


Arthur‐Pinet


Versant‐Nord

Roland‐Pépin

Percentages

target



Chart 53




L'Amitié n= 23

La Source n= 28

Le Tremplin n= 54

La Passerelle n= 27

L'Envolée n= 57

L'Étincelle n= 24

La‐Rivière n= 7


Isidoren= 20



wrote the exam

Grade 8

Français

67

74

50

56

72

75

57

42

36

43

L'Étincelle

L'Envolée


La Passerelle

Le Tremplin

La Source

L'Amitié

René‐Chouinard

Centre la fontaine



Ola‐léger n= 21

n= 14

District 09 n= 451

Province n= 2147

Soeur‐Saint‐

Alexandren= 22

Marguerite‐

Bourgeoysn= 60


59


69

65

71

90

50

82

63

50

57

67

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 09


Ola‐léger





La‐Rivière

L'Étincelle

Percentages

target


Chart 54




n= 33

n= 31

Secondaire

Assomptionn= 22

Grade 8

Français

District 11


wrote the exam

Carrefour‐

Beausoleiln= 13




Sainte‐Annen= 26

La Marée‐

Montante

70

64

67

57

65

55

88

45

92



Donat‐Robichaud

Grande‐Digue



Le Soleil‐Levant



Mont‐Carmel n= 17


Saint‐Paul * n= 11


Notre‐Dame n= 18

District 11 n= 411

Province n= 2147

Dr.‐Marguerite‐

Michaudn= 32

Mgr‐François‐

Bourgeoisn= 67


n= 33LeBlanc

60

69

63

47

63

39

69

82

50

65

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Blanche‐Bourgeois

Notre‐Dame


Saint‐Paul *

Camille‐Vautour

Mont‐Carmel

Bourgeois

Percentages

target


Elementary school results by sex, including the districts and province

61


Reading comprehension

Chart 55

District Boys Girls

01 338 319

03 205 207

05 189 155

09 218 211

11 176 192

Province 1126 1084

Grade 2

Literacy


wrote the exam

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Silent Reading Test by Sex and by District, Including the Province

72 71 69 69 69 7076

80 7974

77 77

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

Boys Girls

target

Oral reading

Chart 56

District Boys Girls

01 338 319

03 204 207

05 188 155

09 217 211

11 176 192

Province 1123 1084

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Oral Reading Test by Sex and by District, Including the Province

Grade 2

Literacy


wrote the exam

62

7076 76

6865

71

81 8288

8480 83

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

Boys Girls

target


Chart 57

District Boys Girls

01 299 287

03 209 225

05 170 163

09 202 207

11 177 197

Province 1057 1079

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam by Sex and by District, Including

the Province

7267 68 71 68 70

7772

6874

6672

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

Boys Girls

target

Chart 58

District Boys Girls

01 226 313

03 181 215

05 172 176

09 261 198

11 184 186

Province 1024 1088


wrote the exam

Grade 4

Literacy

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Grade 4 Literacy Assessment by Sex and by District, Including the

Province

63

55

4651 48

40

48

60

70 67 70

45

62

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

Boys Girls

target


Chart 59

District Boys Girls

01 277 286

03 241 217

05 183 187

09 237 244

11 201 193

Province 1139 1127

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 5 Sciences & technologies Exam by Sex and by District,

Including the ProvinceNumber of students who

wrote the exam

Grade 5

Sciences et

technologies

81

7380

7268

75

87

73 75 7378 78

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

Boys Girls

target

Chart 60

District Boys Girls

01 277 286

03 241 217

05 183 187

09 237 244

11 201 193

Province 1139 1127


the Province

64


wrote the examen

Grade 5

Mathématiques

7873 75

61

71 72

87

76 7469

76 77

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

Boys Girls

target


Chart 61

District Boys Girls

01 277 286

03 241 217

05 183 187

09 237 244

11 201 193

Province 1139 1127

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 8 Français Exam by Sex and by District, Including the

ProvinceNumber of students who

wrote the exam

Grade 5

Français

6569

65

5358

62

8781 82

71 7179

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

Boys Girls

target

Chart 62

District Boys Girls

01 240 280

03 227 195

05 195 181

09 252 207

11 225 194

Province 1139 1057

Grade 8

Sciences et

technologies


wrote the examen

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 8 Sciences & technologies Exam by Sex and by District,

Including the Province

65

72

57

47

62

5158

7367

58 60 5964

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

Boys Girls

target


Chart 63

District Boys Girls

01 239 279

03 227 195

05 195 181

09 252 207

11 225 194

Province 1138 1056

Grade 8

Mathématiques


wrote the exam


the Province

70

60

43

53

45

55

74 74

4953 51

61

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

Boys Girls

target

Chart 64

District Boys Girls

01 240 280

03 227 195

05 195 181

09 252 207

11 225 194

Province 1139 1057


wrote the exam

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 8 Français Exam by Sex and by District, Including the

Province

66

Grade 8 Français

6158 58 56

5157

83 8375 74 75

78

0

20

40

60

80

100


Percentages

Boys Girls

target

Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results

Chapter 3

Provincial High School Examination Results

Provincial Evaluation Program at the High School Level


The provincial high school examinations areintended to provide provincial certification ofstudies done in Grade 11 Français andGrade 11 Mathématiques. Students enrolledin regular courses write one set of exams and

Grade 10 students’ ESL oral proficiency isreported using a five-level scale. The studentsreceive a certificate attesting to their level ofESL proficiency. Oral proficiency results donot affect Grade 10 ESL course marks.

The results reported in this chapter indicatethe situation for the entire 2009-20101 school

67

Chapter 3

Provincial High School Examination Results

Provincial Evaluation Program at the High School Level


The provincial high school examinations areintended to provide provincial certification ofstudies done in Grade 11 Français andGrade 11 Mathématiques. Students enrolledin regular courses write one set of exams, andthose enrolled in modified courses writeanother.

The provincial exams also assess ESL OralProficiency in Grade 10.

What is the passing grade?

The final passing grade is 55% for Grade 11Français and Mathématiques. The final gradeconsists of 60% of the school mark and 40%of the provincial exam mark.

Grade 10 students’ ESL oral proficiency isreported using a five-level scale. The studentsreceive a certificate attesting to their level ofESL proficiency. Oral proficiency results donot affect Grade 10 ESL course marks.

The results reported in this chapter indicatethe situation for the entire 2009-20101 schoolyear by combining the results for bothsemesters, except in the case of Grade 11Français, which is a full-year course .

__________________1 January and June results are combined on the premise that the exams given in the two semesters are equivalent. The experts who help develop and correct the provincial examinations ensure that the exams given in the two semesters are as parallel as possible.

Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3

Chart 65Provincial exam enrolment rates by course and sex

Provincial exam enrolmentrates by course and sex

Chart 65 clearly shows that boys have atendency to enrol in modified courses. We alsosee that female enrolment rates areconsistently higher in all regular courses.

The gap is especially pronounced in themodified Grade 11 Français course, with boysaccounting for 54% of enrolments and girls for46%. The difference in enrolment rates showsgirls predominant in the following regularcourses: Grade 11 Français (by 8 percentagepoints) and Grade 11 Mathématiques (by 10percentage points)..

45%

54%

46%

55%

46%

54%

Mathématiques 11

Français 11 (mod.)

Français 11 (rég.)

68

55%

45%

45%

55%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Mathématiques 11 (mod.)

Mathématiques 11 (rég.)

Percentages

Boys Girls


Chart 66

Regular level

Provincial Exam Averages by Subject and Sex - Regular Level

% of N.B. students enrolled in

regular courses

Grade 11 Mathématiques: 82%

Grade 11 Français: 89%

63

58

6360

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

Ave

rag

e

Do the provincial exam results differ according to sex?

The provincial results (Charts 66 and 67)show that in the regular courses, girlsoutperformed boys in Mathématiques. Maleand female performance was significantlyequal in Français. In the modified courses,girls and boys obtained comparable results inFrançais, whereas the boys outperformed thegirls in Mathématiques.

This poor performance on the part of boys is asource of concern because it couldconsiderably affect their performance in othersubjects.

Chart 67

Modified level

Grade 11 Mathématiques: 18%

Provincial Exam Averages by Subject and Sex - Modified Level

Grade 11 Français: 11%

69

% of N.B. students enrolled in

modified courses 60 60

58 60

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

Français 11 Mathématiques 11

Ave

rag

e

Boys Girls

40Français 11 Mathématiques 11

Boys Girls

The provincial average (boys and girls combined) is 63% in Grade 11 Français and 59% in Grade 11 Mathématiques.

The provincial average (boys and girls combined) is 59% in Grade 11 Français and60% in Grade 11 Mathématiques .

N.B. .: Differences in averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.


Chart 68

District Boys Girls

01 270 299

03 197 238

05 218 189

09 258 251

11 190 207

Province 1133 1184

Grade 10 English Second Language

Percentage of Students at Intermediate Level or Higher on ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment, by Sex and District, Including the

ProvinceNumber of students who

were interviewed

97

45

72

35

92

68

95

44

70

28

97

67

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100


Per

cen

tag

es

target

Chart 69

70

Percentage of Students at Each ESL Oral Proficiency Level , by Sex, for the Province

0 1 5

26

35

25

8

0 0 5

28 2830

9

0

10

20

30

40

Exempted Unratable Novice Basic Intermediate Advanced Superior

Per

cen

tag

es

Boys Girls

Boys Girls


Difference between provincial exam average and school mark average

71


Is there an appreciable difference between the exam marks and theschool marks?

Charts 70 to 81 show that there is often an appreciable difference between provincial exammarks and school marks. This difference is especially pronounced for the regular courses,with school marks being as much as 30 percentage points higher. For a district overall, thegap generally hovers around 8 percentage points. In the modified courses, the differencebetween provincial exam marks and school marks is smaller, hovering around 9 percentagepoints, although it may be as high as 20 percentage points, depending on the course andthe district.

72


Chart 70

Regular level

District 01 n= 435

District 03 n= 356

District 05 n= 125

District 09 n= 404

District 11 n= 287

Province n= 1607

Grade 11

Français


wrote the exam

Français 11 Averages by District - Regular Level

Français 10331 and 10332 averages by district -school marks and provincial exam marks

The Français curricula are based on a communicative approach, whichexplains why the Français examination consists of two tests, a readingtest and a writing test, each worth 50%. The mark for the writing testincludes a “language” component (70%) and a “discourse andcommunication” component (30%).

71 74 76 73 70 73

64 62 61 6258

62

0

20

40

60

80

100


Per

cen

tag

e

Chart 71

Modified level

District 01 n= 58

District 03 n= 54

District 05 n= 44

District 09 n= 54

District 11 n= 50

Province n= 260

73


wrote the exam

Français 11 averagesby District - Modified Level

N.B. Differences in averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.

0District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province

School mark Provincial exman

64 63 6559 60 62

57 55 57 55 53 56

0

20

40

60

80

100


Per

cen

tag

e



Chart 72

Regular level

Difference, by School, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average in Français 10331

Grade 11

Français

Province‐wide difference

between provincial exam

average and school mark

average: ‐10.6 percentage

points

-21,1

-18,3

-17,1

-16,6

-15,3

-12,0

-11,9

-11,6

-11,0

-10,8

-10,6

-10,3

-9,8

-8,4

-6,7

-6,6

-6,5

-6,1

-5,7

-5,5

-4,9

Secondaire Népisiguit**

Carrefour Beausoleil

Clément-Cormier

Thomas-Albert

Aux quatre vents

Louis-Mailloux

Cité-des-Jeunes

Sainte-Anne

W.-A.-Losier

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard


Province

Grande-Rivière

Roland-Pépin

Samuel-de-Champlain

L'Odyssée

Louis-J.-Robichaud

Marie-Esther

Marie-Gaétane

Mathieu-Martin

Centre La fontaine

A.-J.-Savoie

Chart 73

Regular level Difference, by District, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average in Français 10331

74

-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne*

Secondaire Népisiguit

Percentage points

-13,1

-12,4

-11,8

-10,7

-10,6

-7,4

-15 -10 -5 0 5 10

District 05

District 11

District 03

District 09

Province

District 01

Percentage points

* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.** The results were not published for exceptional reasons.


Chart 74

Modified level

Difference, by School, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average in Français 10332

Grade 11

Français





points

-13,2-11,0

-10,3-10,3

-8,9-8,4

-6,6-6,6-6,5

-5,6-5,5-5,4

-4,9-3,6

6,2

15 10 5 0 5 10

A.-J.-Savoie *Aux quatre vents *

Carrefour Beausoleil *Centre La fontaine *

Grande-Rivière *Marie-Gaétane *

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne *Samuel-de-Champlain **

Mgr-M.-F.-RichardThomas-AlbertLouis-MaillouxRoland-Pépin

Clément-CormierSecondaire Népisiguit

Sainte-AnneProvince

Mathieu-MartinW.-A.-Losier

L'OdysséeLouis-J.-Robichaud

Cité-des-JeunesSecondaire Assomption

Marie-Esther

Chart 75

Modified levelDifference, by School, between the School Provincial Exam

Average and School Mark Average in Français 10332

75

-15 -10 -5 0 5 10

Percentage points

-8,5

-7,7

-7,0

-6,6

-6,2

-3,9

-10 -5 0 5

District 05

District 03

District 11

Province

District 01

District 09

Percentage points

* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.** This school had no students who wrote the modified-level exam


Chart 76

Regular level

District 01 n= 464

District 03 n= 355

District 05 n= 314

District 09 n= 360

District 11 n= 303

Province n= 1796

Mathématiques 11 Averagesby District - Regular Level

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam76 75 74 75 74 75

68

58 60 62 63 63

0

20

40

60

80

100


Per

cen

tag

e

Mathématiques 30311 and 30312 averages by district -school marks and provincial exam marks

In Mathématiques, more than 80% of students write their exam in January, at the end of the first semester of Grade 11. Generally speaking, students display a satisfactory understanding of mathematical concepts and their decontextualized application. The main challenges lie with the problem-solving component, but students are increasingly demonstrating effective solving strategies.

Province n= 1796

Chart 77

Modified level

District 01 n= 62

District 03 n= 86

District 05 n= 90

District 09 n= 149

District 11 n= 62

Province n= 449

Mathématiques 11 Averages, by District, Modified Level

76


wrote the exam



66 67 69 65 64 6659 61

5660 59 59

0

20

40

60

80

100


Per

cen

tag

e


N.B. Differences in averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.


Chart 78

Regular level

Difference, by School, between the Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average in Mathématiques 30311

Grade 11

Mathématiques





points

-30,1

-21,7

-21,5

-21,1

-19,8

-19,7

-17,4

-15,4

-13,6

-13,2

-12,8

-12,4

-11,2

-10,4

-9,2

-8,7

-8,2

-7,7

-7,2

-7,2

-7,0

-6,4

-3,7

A.-J.-Savoie

Aux quatre vents

Centre La fontaine

Marie-Gaétane

Thomas-Albert

Marie-Esther

Clément-Cormier



Cité-des-Jeunes

L'Odyssée

Province

Louis-Mailloux

Sainte-Anne

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne

Grande-Rivière

Roland-Pépin

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard

Louis-J.-Robichaud


Samuel-de-Champlain

W.-A.-Losier

Mathieu-Martin

Chart 79

Regular level

Difference, by District, between the Provincial Mark Average and the School Mark Average in Mathématiques 30311

77

30,

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5

Percentage points

-17,3

-13,7

-12,7

-12,4

-11,5

-8,0

-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5

District 03

District 05

District 09

Province

District 11

District 01

Percentage points


Chart 80

Modified level

Difference, by School, between the Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average in Mathématiques 30312

Grade 11

Mathématiques





points

-15,1

-14,9

-12,1

-11,7

-11,4

-11,3

-11,0

-9,8

-9,4

-8,7

-7,8

-6,4

-4,6

-2,7

-0,3

1,3

Marie-Gaétane *

A.-J.-Savoie *

Grande-Rivière *

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne *

Secondaire Assomption *

Samuel-de-Champlain *

Carrefour Beausoleil *

Roland-Pépin

Louis-Mailloux

Centre La fontaine

Marie-Esther

Aux quatre vents


Louis-J.-Robichaud

Sainte-Anne

Thomas-Albert

Mathieu-Martin

Province

Cité-des-Jeunes

Clément-Cormier

L'Odyssée

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard

W.-A.-Losier

Chart 81

Modified level

78

Difference, by District, between the Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average in Mathématiques 30312

-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5

Marie-Gaétane *

Percentage points

-12,3

-7,8

-6,9

-6,9

-6,5

-6,4

-15 -10 -5 0 5 10

District 05

Province

District 01

District 09

District 03

District 11

Percentage points



Performance indices for Français and Mathématiques by school, including the districts and province

79


What is the performance index?

The performance index gives the percentage of students in regular and modified courseswho earned a passing mark on the regular-level examinations. Since one objective of theeducation system is to prepare students for post-secondary studies, it is important that theybe able to pass the regular-level exams. This is an excellent indicator of their level ofpreparedness for post-secondary education.

Sample performance index calculation

Say that 75% of all students at school X are enrolled in the regular Mathématiques course.

Now say that 64% of the students who wrote the regular-level Mathématiques exam passed it .

The performance index is then calculated as follows:

(75 64)/100 = 48

Consequently, it can be said that 48% of all students at school X passed the regular-level Mathématiques exam. The performance index for school X is 48 for the Mathématiques

80

course.


Chart 82Performance Index by School for Grade 11 Français

Grade 11

Français

51

52

58

61

46

63

69

59

61

74

62

58

61

Secondaire Népisiguit *

Roland-Pépin

Aux-Quatre-Vents

District 03

Cité-des-Jeunes

Thomas-Albert

Grande-Rivière

A.-J.-Savoie

Marie-Gaétane

District 01

Samuel-de-Champlain

Sainte-Anne

L'Odyssée

Mathieu-Martin

81

56

46

55

42

38

59

35

57

45

57

67

51

52

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Mgr-M.-F.-Richard


Rég. De Baie-Sainte-Anne**

Louis-J.-Robichaud

Clément-Cormier

District 09

La fontaine

W.-Arthur-Losier

Marie-Esther

Louis-Mailloux

District 05


Percentage points

target

* The results were not published for exceptional reasons.** The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.


Chart 83

Grade 11

Mathématiques

Performance Index by School for Grade 11 Mathématiques

42

38

35

37

38

36

50

21

46

61

81

70

53

60


Roland-Pépin

Aux-Quatre-Vents

District 03

Cité-des-Jeunes

Thomas-Albert

Grande-Rivière

A.-J.-Savoie

Marie-Gaétane

District 01

Samuel-de-Champlain

Sainte-Anne

L'Odyssée

Mathieu-Martin

82

46

48

75

54

50

46

52

40

43

39

36

42

52

40

42

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11


Mgr-M.-F.-Richard


Rég. De Baie-Sainte-Anne

Louis-J.-Robichaud

Clément-Cormier

District 09

Centre La fontaine

W.-Arthur-Losier

Marie-Esther

Louis-Mailloux

District 05


Percentage points

target


Chart 84 District and Provincial Performance Indices for Grade 11 Français since 2006

Grade 11

Français

30

40

50

60

70

80

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Perform

ance indices

District 01 District 03 District 05

District 09 District 11 Province

Chart 85 District and Provincial Performance Indices for Grade 11 Mathématiques since 2006

Grade 11

Mathématiques

83

30

40

50

60

70

80

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Perform

ance indices

District 01 District 03 District 05

District 09 District 11 Province


Percentage of students having achieved intermediate level or higher on the Grade 10 ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment, by school, including the districts and province

Second language oral proficiency scale

Novice Able to satisfy immediate needs using rehearsed phrases. No real autonomy of expression, flexibility, or spontaneity. Can ask questions or make statements with reasonable accuracy but only with memorized phrases. Vocabulary is very limited.

Basic Able to create with the language by combining and recombining learned elements. Can satisfy minimum courtesy requirements and maintain very simple face-to-face interaction with native speakers accustomed to dealing with second language learners. Almost every utterance contains fractured syntax and grammatical errors. Vocabulary is adequate to express most elementary needs.

Intermediate* Able to initiate and maintain routine conversations and satisfy predictable requirements in

84

Able to initiate and maintain routine conversations and satisfy predictable requirements in school/work settings. Able to provide autobiographical information in some detail and give explanations with some degree of accuracy, but language is awkward . Able to state facts and narrate, describe, report on and speak of current, past, and future activities. Can give directions from one place to another; can give accurate instructions in a field of personal expertise. Has a speaking vocabulary to converse simply, with some paraphrasing. Accent, though often quite faulty, is intelligible. Uses high-frequency language structures accurately, but does not have a thorough or confident control of grammar. In certain situations, diction would probably distract a native speaker.

* Intermediate is the level expected of students at the end of Grade 10.


AdvancedAble to speak the language with sufficient structural accuracy and vocabulary to participate effectively in most formal and in all informal conversations, on practical, social, and academic or work-related topics. Control of grammar is good and speech is fluent. Can describe in detail and narrate accurately. Can discuss abstract topics and ideas as well as events. Can support opinions and hypothesize. Accent may be obvious but never interferes with understanding. Sporadic errors still occur, but they would not distract a native speaker or interfere with communication.

SuperiorAble to use the language fluently and accurately on all levels normally pertinent to personal situation (academic, social, work-related).Can understand and participate in any conversation with a high degree of fluency and precision of vocabulary.Accent is good, but the speaker would not necessarily be taken for a native speaker.

85


Chart 86

Sainte‐Anne n=108

L'Odyssée n=177

Mathieu‐Martin n=235

District 01 n=569

Cité‐des‐Jeunes n=239

Thomas‐Albert n=91

Grande‐Rivière n=23

A.‐J.‐Savoie n=50

Marie‐Gaétane n=32

District 03 n=435

Percentage of Students Having Achieved Intermediate Level or Higher on ESL Proficiency Assessment , at Grade 10, by School

Number of students

interviewed:

Samuel‐de‐

Champlain

Grade 10 English

Second Language

n=49

65

74

44

19

68

48

64

35

96

97

94

95

96

Roland-Pépin


District 03

Marie-Gaétane

A.-J.-Savoie

Grande-Rivière

Thomas-Albert

Cité-des-Jeunes

District 01

Mathieu-Martin

L'Odyssée

Sainte-Anne

Samuel-de-Champlain

Secondaire Népisigu n=246

Aux quatre vents n=72

District 05 n=407

Centre La Fontaine n=37

W.‐A.‐Losier n=182

Marie‐Esther n=150

Louis‐Mailloux n=140

District 09 n=509

Carrefour Beausoleil n=12

Mgr‐M.‐F.‐Richard n=83

Rég. de Baie‐Sainte‐An=22

Clément‐Cormier n=127

District 11 n=397

Province n=2317

86

Roland‐Pépin

Secondaire

Assomption

Louis‐J.‐Robichaud

n=89

n=29

n=124

67

94

93

95

100

93

96

83

31

24

23

35

78

71

68

0 20 40 60 80 100

Province

District 11

Clément-Cormier

Louis-J.-Robichaud

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne


Mgr-M.-F.-Richard


District 09

Louis-Mailloux

Marie-Esther

W.-A.-Losier

Centre La Fontaine

District 05

Aux quatre vents

p

Percentages

target


Percentage of students having achieved a provincial exam result of 55% or more (acceptable level) or 70% (competent level) by subject and school, including the districts and province, since 2006

87

Percentage of students having achieved a provincial exam result of 55% or more (acceptable level) or 70% (competent level) by subject and school, including the districts and province, since 2006

Provincial High School Examination Results‐ Chapter 3

Regular level

Chart 87

2006 2007 2008

School 164 173 173

District 398 404 451

Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 188 191

District 414 444

Province 1961 1639

District 01 École Mathieu‐Martin

Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006


wrote the exam

Grade 11

Français

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages

School (55% +) District 01 (55% +) Province (55% +)


Regular level

Chart 88

2006 2007 2008

School 147 183 186


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 189 204

District 430 464

Province 1956 1803

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

88

Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 89

2006 2007 2008

School 144 151 147


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 137 137

District 414 444

Province 1961 1639


wrote the exam


District 01 École L'Odyssée

Grade 11

Français

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 90

2006 2007 2008

School 121 137 160


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 137 146

District 430 464

Province 1956 1803

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

89


0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 91

2006 2007 2008

School 57 59 97


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 58 84

District 414 444

Province 1961 1639


wrote the exam

District 01 École Sainte‐Anne

Grade 11

Français


0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Niveau régulier

Chart 92

2006 2007 2008

School 57 60 87


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 68 84

District 430 464

Province 1956 1803

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

90


0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 93

2006 2007 2008

School 33 21 34


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 31 32

District 414 444

Province 1961 1639


wrote the exam


District 01 École Samuel‐de‐Champlain

Grade 11

Français

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 94

2006 2007 2008

School 35 23 31


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 36 30

District 430 464

Province 1956 1803


wrote the exam

Grade 11

Mathématiques


91

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 95

2006 2007 2008

School 19 28 41


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 30 32

District 418 359

Province 1961 1639


wrote the exam

District 03 École Marie‐Gaétane

Grade 11

Français


0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 96

2006 2007 2008

School 21 22 38


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 37 31

District 426 357

Province 1956 1803

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam


92

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 97

2006 2007 2008

School 51 51 43


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 49 40

District 418 359

Province 1961 1639


wrote the exam

Grade 11

Français


District 03 Polyvalente A.‐J.‐Savoie

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 98

2006 2007 2008

School 42 45 52


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 53 40

District 426 357

Province 1956 1803


wrote the exam


Grade 11

Mathématiques

93

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 99

2006 2007 2008

School 14 26 24


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 17 15

District 418 359

Province 1961 1639


wrote the exam

Grade 11

Français


District 03 École Grande‐Rivière

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 100

2006 2007 2008

School 13 31 24


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 16 13

District 426 357

Province 1956 1803

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam


94

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 101

2006 2007 2008

School 74 98 106


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 98 86

District 418 359

Province 1961 1639


wrote the exam


Polyvalente Thomas‐Albert

Grade 11

Français

District 03

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 102

2006 2007 2008

School 63 99 93


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 95 90

District 426 357

Province 1956 1803

Grade 11

Mathématiques


95


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 103

2006 2007 2008

School 252 230 241


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 224 186

District 418 359

Province 1961 1639



wrote the exam

District 03 Cité‐des‐Jeunes A.‐M.‐Sormany

Grade 11

Français

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 104

2006 2007 2008

School 233 220 246


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 225 183

District 426 357

Province 1956 1803


wrote the exam


Grade 11

Mathématiques

96

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 105

2006 2007 2008

School 89 66 72


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 49 63

District 348 128

Province 1961 1639


wrote the exam

District 05 École Aux quatre vents

Grade 11

Français


0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 106

2006 2007 2008

School 108 78 74


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 55 65

District 372 318

Province 1956 1803

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam


97

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 107

2006 2007 2008

School 91 72 93


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 85 65

District 348 128

Province 1961 1639


wrote the exam

District 05 Polyvalente Roland‐Pépin


Grade 11

Français

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 108

2006 2007 2008

School 76 83 109


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 99 88

District 372 318

Province 1956 1803


wrote the exam

Grade 11

Mathématiques


98

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 109

2006 2007 2008

School 234 237 183


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 214 0

District 348 128

Province 1961 1639

District 05 École Secondaire Népisiguit *

Grade 11

Français



wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 110

2006 2007 2008

School 239 234 35


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 218 165

District 372 318

Province 1956 1803

* The exam was optional in January 2008 because of an exceptional situation.


wrote the exam


99

Grade 11

Mathématiques

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 111

2006 2007 2008

School 126 124 110


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 120 114

District 435 411

Province 1961 1639

Grade 11

Français


wrote the exam


District 09 Polyvalente Louis‐Mailloux

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 112

2006 2007 2008

School 109 111 117


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 108 118

District 374 361

Province 1956 1803

Grade 11

Mathématiques


100


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 113

2006 2007 2008

School 101 122 120


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 114 115

District 435 411

Province 1961 1639


wrote the exam

Grade 11

Français


District 09 École Marie‐Esther

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 114

2006 2007 2008

School 75 102 111


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 110 91

District 374 361

Province 1956 1803

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

101


0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 115

2006 2007 2008

School 171 179 196


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 165 148

District 435 411

Province 1961 1639

District 09 Polyvalente W.‐Arthur‐Losier

Grade 11

Français


wrote the exam


0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 116

2006 2007 2008

School 152 158 149


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 116 119

District 374 361

Province 1956 1803


wrote the exam

102


Grade 11

Mathématiques

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 117

2006 2007 2008

School 41 43 34


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 36 34

District 435 411

Province 1961 1639

District 09 Centre scolaire‐communautaire La Fontaine

Grade 11

Français


wrote the exam


0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 118

2006 2007 2008

School 53 44 31


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 40 33

District 374 361

Province 1956 1803


wrote the exam

Grade 11

Mathématiques


103

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 119

2006 2007 2008

School 124 115 96


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 105 107

District 346 297

Province 1961 1639

Number of studens who

wrote the exam

Grade 11

Français

District 11 École Clément‐Cormier


0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 120

2006 2007 2008

School 138 117 99


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 112 109

District 354 303

Province 1956 1803

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam


104

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 121

2006 2007 2008

School 120 137 120


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 134 106

District 346 297

Province 1961 1639


District 11 École Louis‐J.‐Robichaud

Grade 11

Français


wrote the exam

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 122

2006 2007 2008

School 138 141 127


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 134 109

District 354 303

Province 1956 1803


wrote the exam


Grade 11

Mathématiques

105

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 123

2006 2007 2008

School 13 9 12


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 9 5

District 346 297

Province 1961 1639

District 11 École Régionale de Baie‐Sainte‐Anne

Grade 11

Français


wrote the exam


0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 124

2006 2007 2008

School 15 11 10


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 9 11

District 354 303

Province 1956 1803

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

106


0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 125

2006 2007 2008

School 17 21 23


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 23 16

District 346 297

Province 1961 1639


wrote the exam


District 11 École Secondaire Assomption

Grade 11

Français

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 126

2006 2007 2008

School 29 24 26


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 28 18

District 354 303

Province 1956 1803

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam


107

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 127

2006 2007 2008

School 65 57 51


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 65 55

District 346 297

Province 1961 1639


wrote the exam

Grade 11

Français


District 11 École Mgr‐M.‐F.‐Richard

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 128

2006 2007 2008

School 92 65 57


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 61 49

District 354 303

Province 1956 1803

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam


108

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Regular level

Chart 129

2006 2007 2008

School 11 8 10


Province 2011 2027 2026

2009 2010 2011

School 10 7

District 346 297

Province 1961 1639

District 11 École Carrefour Beausoleil

Grade 11

Français


wrote the exam


0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages



Regular level

Chart 130

2006 2007 2008

School 13 11 12


Province 1969 1999 1874

2009 2010 2011

School 10 7

District 354 303

Province 1956 1803

Grade 11

Mathématiques


wrote the exam

109


0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percentages




Tables by subject, level, and school at the high school level

110


Schools

Mathieu-Martin 18 191 83 70 64 75 67 95 61 20 178 87 70 65 76 68 94 64

L'Odyssée 2 137 81 71 64 73 68 93 58 6 136 89 66 60 67 64 86 58

Sainte-Anne 1 84 92 74 62 68 69 98 62 3 57 93 78 63 72 72 97 67

Samuel-de-Champlain 1 32 97 72 64 78 69 97 74 1 31 94 71 66 84 69 94 79

District 01 22 444 85 71 64 73 68 95 61 30 402 89 70 63 73 67 92 63

Marie-Gaétane 3 32 89 69 65 69 68 88 59 2 30 100 75 64 73 70 100 69

A.-J.-Savoie 1 40 98 68 63 73 66 85 69 0 49 92 75 65 78 71 94 72

Grande-Rivière 0 15 94 69 59 67 65 87 63 0 17 85 64 54 35 60 77 30

Thomas-Albert 3 86 83 74 57 56 68 91 46 3 97 88 75 55 50 67 94 44

Cité-des-Jeunes 7 186 85 76 64 73 71 97 61 11 222 92 76 62 73 71 97 66

District 03 14 359 87 74 62 68 69 93 58 16 415 91 75 61 67 69 96 60

Aux quatre vents 2 63 85 77 61 62 71 98 52 0 49 79 78 60 61 71 98 48

Roland-Pépin 7 65 88 70 61 63 67 87 51 4 85 88 75 64 75 71 94 66

Secondaire Népisiguit ** 0 - - 77 - - - - - 8 214 89 71 62 71 67 91 62

Final Mark*

% Pass Final Mark

Perfor-mance Index

No. of Absentees

% of Students in This Level

School Mark

Prov. Exam Mark

% Pass Exam

No. of Attendees

No. of Absentees

No. of Attendees

% Pass Exam

Final Mark*

% PassFinal Mark

Perfor-mance Index


SchoolMark

Prov. Exam Mark

Français Grade 11 (regular level)2009-2010

Français Grade 11 (regular level)2008-2009

District 05 9 128 69 76 61 63 72 96 52 12 348 87 73 62 70 69 93 61

Louis-Mailloux 5 114 81 76 61 65 71 97 51 4 117 87 74 60 62 68 98 52

Marie-Esther 7 115 89 70 65 77 68 96 67 6 110 87 70 64 76 68 94 65

W.-A.-Losier 4 148 85 74 62 68 69 89 57 8 162 91 69 60 65 65 84 56

Centre La Fontaine 1 34 87 63 58 56 61 77 45 0 36 92 69 60 61 66 86 56

District 09 17 411 85 73 62 69 69 92 57 18 425 89 71 61 67 67 90 57

Clément-Cormier 9 107 86 71 54 42 65 89 35 8 105 87 70 55 45 64 81 39

Louis-J.-Robichaud 1 106 80 69 62 75 66 95 59 2 134 89 69 62 72 66 92 64

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne 0 6 86 79 62 67 72 100 57 0 9 100 74 62 67 69 100 55

Secondaire Assomption 1 16 73 70 60 56 66 94 38 0 22 88 67 54 36 61 77 32

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 0 55 95 66 56 45 62 73 42 3 64 97 71 57 58 65 94 48

Carrefour Beausoleil 0 7 64 83 62 86 74 100 55 1 9 100 80 65 89 74 100 89

District 11 11 297 84 70 58 57 65 89 46 14 343 90 70 58 59 65 89 51

Province 73 1639 84 73 62 67 69 93 56 90 1933 89 72 61 67 68 92 59

* Passing grade: 55 %** Results were not published for exceptional reasons.

111


SchoolsMathieu-Martin 2 39 17 64 57 46 62 92 7 27 13 63 54 41 59 85

L'Odyssée 1 32 19 65 59 41 63 94 4 17 11 63 56 59 60 95

Sainte-Anne 1 7 8 58 52 43 56 71 0 4 - - - - - -

Samuel-de-Champlain ** 0 1 - - - - - - 0 2 - - - - - -

District 01 4 79 15 64 57 43 62 91 11 50 11 63 55 46 60 89

Marie-Gaétane ** 1 4 - - - - - - 0 0 - - - - - -

A.-J.-Savoie ** 0 1 - - - - - - 0 4 - - - - - -

Grande-Rivière ** 0 1 - - - - - - 0 3 - - - - - -

Thomas-Albert 1 17 17 63 52 29 58 88 0 13 12 63 53 39 59 100

Cité-des-Jeunes 1 32 15 62 58 69 61 97 0 20 8 64 58 65 62 95

District 03 3 55 13 63 55 53 60 91 0 40 9 62 57 58 60 95

Aux quatre vents 0 11 15 62 59 27 61 82 0 13 21 68 55 46 63 92

Roland-Pépin 4 9 12 67 58 67 64 100 0 12 12 61 62 83 62 100

Secondaire Népisiguit 2 37 17 66 57 59 63 97 2 27 11 62 58 59 60 93

% Pass Final Mark

Prov. Exam Mark

% Pass Exam


No. of Attendees

Final Mark*

School Mark

No. of Absentees

No. of Attendees


School Mark

Prov. Exam Mark

% Pass Exam

Final Mark*

% Pass Final Mark

No. of Absentees

Français Grade 11 (modified level)2008-2009

Français Grade 11 (modified level)2009-2010

District 05 6 57 31 65 57 54 63 95 2 52 13 63 58 62 61 94

Louis-Mailloux 4 26 19 65 57 38 64 96 6 18 13 68 60 72 65 100

Marie-Esther 1 14 11 55 61 64 57 67 2 16 13 53 59 63 55 69

W.-A.-Losier 2 26 15 57 52 27 55 56 5 17 9 56 54 47 54 65

Centre La Fontaine ** 0 5 - - - - - - 0 3 - - - - - -

District 09 7 71 15 59 55 39 59 72 13 54 11 60 57 59 58 79

Clément-Cormier 3 17 14 60 52 12 59 84 1 16 13 59 50 31 56 75

Louis-J.-Robichaud 0 27 20 59 53 41 57 85 1 16 11 60 55 56 58 88

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne ** 0 1 - - - - - - 2 0 - - ‐ - - -

Secondaire Assomption ** 0 6 - 61 58 67 60 83 0 3 - - - - - -

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard ** 0 3 - - - - - - 11 2 - - - - - -

Carrefour Beausoleil ** 0 4 - - - - - - 0 0 - - - - - -

District 11 3 58 16 60 53 34 58 83 15 37 10 60 53 49 58 86

Province 23 320 16 62 56 44 60 86 41 233 11 61 56 55 59 88

* Passing grade: 55 %

112

** The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the restuls for the district and province.


Schools

Mathieu-Martin 3 204 84 72 68 74 71 91 60 5 189 83 75 72 86 74 97 71

L'Odyssée 6 146 89 76 64 60 71 95 53 3 137 93 77 63 64 72 93 59

Sainte-Anne 2 84 93 80 70 77 76 99 70 1 68 97 80 72 81 77 99 78

Samuel-de-Champlain 1 30 97 83 76 83 80 100 81 0 36 88 80 71 75 78 94 66

District 01 12 464 88 76 68 70 73 94 61 9 430 88 77 69 77 74 96 68

Marie-Gaétane 0 31 91 78 57 52 69 90 46 0 37 88 78 56 54 69 92 48

A.-J.-Savoie 1 40 93 77 48 23 66 95 21 0 53 96 78 62 74 72 96 71

Grande-Rivière 0 13 81 70 61 62 66 92 50 1 16 80 68 59 56 65 94 43

Thomas-Albert 2 90 86 75 56 43 67 92 36 0 95 82 75 61 56 69 95 45

Cité-des-Jeunes 8 183 74 74 62 53 70 86 38 6 225 83 75 60 54 69 88 45

District 03 11 357 80 75 58 47 69 89 37 7 426 84 75 60 57 69 91 48

Aux quatre vents 6 65 80 78 59 45 71 93 35 1 55 71 81 63 69 75 98 48

Roland-Pépin 5 88 79 67 59 49 64 81 38 4 99 80 68 62 64 66 77 51

Secondaire Népisiguit ** 4 165 76 75 62 56 70 95 42 5 218 82 78 60 60 72 94 47

% PassFinal Mark

Perfor-mance Index

No. of Attendees

School Mark

Prov. Exam Mark

% Pass Exam


No. of Absentees

No. of Attendees


School Mark

Prov. Exam Mark

% Pass Exam

Perfor-mance Index

Mathématiques Grade 11 (regular level)2009-2010

Mathématiques Grade 11 (regular level)2008-2009

No. of Absentees

Final Mark*

Final Mark*

% Pass Final Mark

District 05 15 318 78 74 60 52 69 90 40 10 372 79 76 61 62 71 90 49

Louis-Mailloux 3 118 72 76 65 74 72 93 52 7 108 81 73 62 64 70 92 50

Marie-Esther 5 91 76 78 59 55 71 93 42 2 110 74 74 55 46 68 87 33

W.-A.-Losier 8 119 62 70 64 62 68 91 36 4 116 63 71 57 63 66 83 39

Centre La Fontaine 1 33 80 78 56 48 69 97 39 0 40 89 75 57 50 70 85 44

District 09 17 361 70 75 62 63 70 93 43 13 374 73 73 58 57 68 87 40

Clément-Cormier 9 109 89 74 58 47 68 91 40 3 112 89 73 65 68 70 89 60

Louis-J.-Robichaud 4 109 77 75 68 69 72 95 52 4 134 88 78 74 84 76 96 73

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne 1 10 83 73 63 60 69 100 46 1 9 90 75 65 78 72 89 71

Secondaire Assomption 0 18 95 75 60 56 69 78 50 0 28 93 74 63 79 71 100 73

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 2 49 80 72 64 67 69 96 54 0 61 80 75 61 66 70 84 51

Carrefour Beausoleil 0 7 88 82 75 86 79 100 75 0 10 100 80 75 90 78 100 90

District 11 16 302 83 74 63 60 70 93 48 8 354 88 75 68 75 73 92 65

Province 71 1802 80 75 63 59 70 92 46 47 1956 82 75 63 66 71 91 53

* Passing grade: 55 %

113


SchoolsMathieu-Martin 6 40 16 68 60 60 65 86 2 38 17 70 59 66 67 87

L'Odyssée 0 18 11 61 59 56 60 83 0 11 7 60 61 82 60 73

Sainte-Anne ** 1 6 7 65 55 67 61 100 1 2 - - - - - -

Samuel-de-Champlain ** 0 1 - - - - - - 0 5 - - - - - -

District 01 7 65 12 66 59 60 63 87 3 56 12 68 59 68 65 86

Marie-Gaétane ** 1 3 - - - - - - 0 5 - - - - - -

A.-J.-Savoie ** 0 3 - - - - - - 0 2 - - - - - -

Grande-Rivière ** 0 3 - - - - - - 1 4 - - - - - -

Thomas-Albert 3 15 14 71 60 53 67 100 3 21 18 59 55 48 58 81

Cité-des-Jeunes 6 63 26 67 62 73 65 94 0 47 17 62 60 64 61 81

District 03 10 87 20 67 61 68 65 94 4 79 16 61 59 61 60 82

Aux quatre vents 0 16 20 65 55 38 61 81 1 23 29 72 63 74 69 96

Roland-Pépin 1 23 21 73 57 57 67 92 0 25 20 66 51 44 62 68

Secondaire Népisiguit 1 53 24 68 57 53 64 91 7 48 18 69 55 54 65 83

Final Mark*

% Pass Final Mark

No. of Absentees

% Pass Exam

No. of Absentees

No. of Attendees


School Mark

Prov. Exam Mark

% PassFinal Mark

School Mark

Prov. Exam Mark

No. of Attendees

% of Studentsin This Level

% Pass Exam

Final Mark*

Mathématiques Grade 11 (modified level)2008-2009

Mathématiques Grade 11 (modified level)2009-2010

District 05 2 92 22 69 56 51 64 89 8 96 21 69 56 56 65 82

Louis-Mailloux 3 47 28 75 61 70 70 98 6 25 19 72 52 28 65 89

Marie-Esther 2 29 24 69 57 69 64 86 5 38 26 70 54 40 65 92

W.-A.-Losier 11 72 38 58 62 69 61 81 4 68 37 63 57 57 61 83

Centre La Fontaine ** 0 8 20 65 53 38 60 88 0 5 - - - - - -

District 09 16 156 30 65 60 68 64 88 15 136 27 66 55 47 63 86

Clément-Cormier 1 14 11 61 57 50 60 86 1 14 11 68 71 93 69 100

Louis-J.-Robichaud 2 32 23 68 57 50 64 84 2 18 12 67 58 56 64 95

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne ** 0 2 - - - - - - 0 1 - - - - - -

Secondaire Assomption ** 1 1 - - - - - - 0 2 - - - - - -

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 0 12 20 61 60 83 61 100 2 15 20 62 53 47 59 87

Carrefour Beausoleil ** 0 1 - - - - - - 0 0 - - - - -

District 11 4 62 17 64 59 60 62 89 5 50 12 66 61 66 64 94

Province 39 462 20 66 59 62 64 89 35 417 18 66 57 57 63 86* Passing grade: 55 %

114


Schools

Mathieu-Martin 14 248 0,0 0,9 0,0 2,1 20,4 55,3 21,3 8 227 0,4 0,0 0,0 1,8 35,7 48,5 13,7

L'Odyssée 5 178 0,0 0,0 0,6 5,6 13,6 60,5 19,8 2 182 0,0 0,5 1,6 0,0 15,9 55,5 26,4

Sainte-Anne 4 112 0,0 1,9 0,0 2,8 16,7 38,0 40,7 6 98 0,0 0,0 0,0 7,1 10,2 45,9 36,7

Samuel-de-Champlain 0 49 4,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 6,1 26,5 63,3 0 37 5,4 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,7 43,2 48,6

District 01 23 587 0,4 0,7 0,2 3,2 16,3 51,1 28,1 16 544 0,6 0,2 0,6 2,0 22,2 50,0 24,4

Marie-Gaétane 2 32 0,0 3,1 18,8 59,4 18,8 0,0 0,0 1 34 0,0 0,0 20,6 67,6 8,8 2,9 0,0

A.-J.-Savoie 1 51 0,0 0,0 0,0 32,0 64,0 4,0 0,0 1 49 4,1 0,0 26,5 53,1 16,3 0,0 0,0

Grande-Rivière 0 23 0,0 0,0 0,0 52,2 34,8 13,0 0,0 0 17 0,0 0,0 0,0 23,5 47,1 29,4 0,0

Thomas-Albert 4 92 0,0 0,0 2,2 34,1 44,0 18,7 1,1 10 109 0,0 0,0 0,0 27,5 49,5 19,3 3,7

Cité-des-Jeunes 14 248 0,4 0,0 11,3 53,1 25,1 9,6 0,4 4 273 0,0 1,1 13,6 53,1 22,0 10,3 0,0

District 03 21 446 0,2 0,2 8,0 47,1 33,6 10,3 0,5 16 482 0,4 0,6 11,8 47,3 27,6 11,4 0,8

Aux quatre vents 2 72 0,0 0,0 4,2 27,8 31,9 27,8 8,3 1 81 0,0 0,0 7,4 14,8 39,5 30,9 7,4

Roland-Pépin 3 91 1,1 0,0 0,0 33,7 48,3 14,6 2,2 5 96 0,0 1,0 6,3 28,1 46,9 15,6 2,1

Secondaire Népisiguit 12 252 0,0 0,8 3,3 22,0 46,7 24,4 2,8 10 227 0,0 0,9 4,0 22,0 41,9 27,3 4,0

District 05 17 415 0,2 0,5 2,7 25,6 44,5 22,9 3,7 16 404 0,0 0,7 5,2 22,0 42,6 25,2 4,2

Louis-Mailloux 9 148 0,0 0,0 13,6 62,1 19,3 5,0 0,0 3 149 0,7 0,7 17,4 48,3 26,8 6,0 0,0

Exempted UnratableNo. of

AbsenteesAdvanced SuperiorNovice BasicInter-

mediateNo. of

AttendeesNo. of

Absentees

ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment Grade 10 (all levels) 2009-2010

BasicNoviceUnratableExempted SuperiorAdvancedInter-

mediate

ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment Grade 10 (all levels) 2008-2009

No. of Attendees

Marie-Esther 7 154 0,0 2,0 22,7 52,7 16,7 6,0 0,0 10 163 1,2 3,1 16,6 53,4 15,3 9,8 0,6

W.-A.-Losier 10 187 0,0 2,2 9,3 53,8 29,1 5,5 0,0 7 199 1,0 3,0 10,6 53,8 26,1 5,5 0,0

Centre La Fontaine 1 38 0,0 0,0 2,7 18,9 48,6 27,0 2,7 0 41 0,0 0,0 0,0 12,2 43,9 34,1 9,8

District 09 27 527 0,0 1,4 13,9 53,2 24,2 7,1 0,2 20 552 0,9 2,2 13,4 49,1 24,5 9,1 0,9

Clément-Cormier 10 130 0,8 0,0 0,0 6,3 55,9 34,6 2,4 3 125 0,0 0,0 0,8 7,2 51,2 40,0 0,8

Louis-J.-Robichaud 6 128 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,8 43,5 46,8 4,8 5 150 0,0 0,0 1,3 2,0 48,7 41,3 6,7

Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne 1 23 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 18,2 81,8 0,0 0 13 7,7 0,0 0,0 0,0 46,2 46,2 0,0

Secondaire Assomption 3 31 3,4 0,0 0,0 3,4 27,6 58,6 6,9 1 19 5,3 0,0 0,0 0,0 47,4 42,1 5,3

Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 5 86 0,0 0,0 0,0 3,6 48,2 44,6 3,6 1 58 3,4 0,0 0,0 8,6 48,3 39,7 0,0

Carrefour Beausoleil 0 12 0,0 0,0 0,0 16,7 25,0 33,3 25,0 0 13 0,0 0,0 0,0 15,4 23,1 46,2 15,4

District 11 25 410 0,5 0,0 0,0 5,0 45,3 44,8 4,3 10 378 1,1 0,0 0,8 5,0 48,4 41,0 3,7

0 0

Province 113 2385 0,3 0,6 5,1 26,7 31,2 27,8 8,4 78 2360 0,6 0,8 6,7 26,2 31,5 26,9 7,3

115


116

Chapter 4 ‐ Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments

Chapter 4

Results of Pan-Canadian and International Assessments

Pan-Canadian (PCAP/SAIP) and International (PISA) Assessment Programs

What are SAIP and PCAP?1

The School Achievement Indicators Program(SAIP) was a cyclical program of pan-Canadian assessments of studentachievement in mathematics, reading andwriting, and science that was conducted bythe Council of Ministers of Education Canada

Why did CMEC develop SAIP and PCAP?

Canadians have long been interested in howwell their education systems are meeting theneeds of students and society. To provideinformation on this issue, the provinces andterritories through CMEC developed SAIP

117

Chapter 4

Results of Pan-Canadian and International Assessments

Pan-Canadian (PCAP/SAIP) and International (PISA) Assessment Programs

What are SAIP and PCAP?1

The School Achievement Indicators Program(SAIP) was a cyclical program of pan-Canadian assessments of studentachievement in mathematics, reading andwriting, and science that was conducted bythe Council of Ministers of Education, Canada(CMEC) between 1993 and 2004. The Pan-Canadian Assessment Program (PCAP) hassince then replaced SAIP. The first PCAPassessment took place in the spring of 2007.PCAP will continue to assess performance inthe same three core subjects as SAIP but willhave room for other subjects to be added asthe need arises.

_______________1 CMEC (2006). The Pan-Canadian AssessmentProgram (PCAP) and the School AchievementIndicators Program (SAIP). Taken on December 11,2006 from http://www.cmec.ca/pcap/indexe.stm .

Why did CMEC develop SAIP and PCAP?

Canadians have long been interested in howwell their education systems are meeting theneeds of students and society. To provideinformation on this issue, the provinces andterritories, through CMEC, developed SAIPand then PCAP to assess the performance ofstudents in mathematics, reading, andscience. Three cycles of pan-Canadianassessments have been conducted since1993. The information revealed in eachassessment, together with the reviewmechanisms of individual jurisdictions, hasgiven ministers of education a basis forexamining their curriculum and other aspectsof their school system.

Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments ‐ Chapter 4

Why did CMEC replace SAIP with PCAP?

At its 83rd meeting (held on April 2, 2003, inLondon, Ontario), CMEC approved thedevelopment of PCAP to replace SAIP. Theneed for a new pan-Canadian program thatwould reflect changes made in jurisdictionalcurricula within the past decade had becomeapparent in Canadian provinces andterritories. PCAP also recognizes theincreased jurisdictional emphasis now placedon international assessments. It assessesperformance in reading, science, andmathematics, and will have room for othersubjects as the need arises. PCAP assesses13-year-old students and enables provincesand territories to improve their ownassessments and validate their resultsagainst national and international results.

What is PISA?2

The Program for International Student

The assessment covers three domains:reading, mathematics, and science. Althougheach assessment has questions from all threedomains, the focus shifts with eachassessment. In 2000 the focus was onreading, in 2003 on mathematics, and in 2006on science. In 2003, an assessment ofproblem-solving skills was also conducted.

In Canada, the first PISA assessment tookplace in April and May 2000 at the same timeas the Youth in Transition Survey (YITS) foryouth aged 15. The second assessment wasconducted in 2003.

Who participates in PISA?

Although the samples in most countries arebetween 4,000 and 10,000 students, inCanada, over 22,000 students are tested,which allows results to be produced at theprovincial level.

The survey includes a two-hour written test tomeasure students’ knowledge in reading

118

The Program for International StudentAssessment (PISA) is an internationalassessment of the skills and knowledge of15-year-olds. The study is being directed bythe Organization for Economic Co-operationand Development (OECD) and involves over69 countries. As the study will be repeated inother years, it will continue to produce resultsthat can be compared internationally .

_______________2CMEC (2006). The Program for International StudentAssessment (PISA). Taken on December 11, 2006 fromhttp://www.cmec.ca/pisa/indexe.stm .

The survey includes a two-hour written test tomeasure students’ knowledge in reading,mathematics, and science, as well as variousquestionnaires to gather general informationabout the students and their schools.


How are students selected? (PISA)

About 1,000 schools across Canada arerandomly selected to participate in PISA andYITS. In these schools, a random selection ismade of 15-year-old students to determinewho will participate.

How is the information used? (PISA)

Because PISA is an international studyinvolving over 69 countries, it provides aunique examination of the levels ofachievement of 15-year-olds around theworld. It gives a clear indication of thepreparedness of these students as theycontinue in their studies and enter the workforce. It is able to address questions such as :

How well are young adults prepared tomeet the challenges of the future?

Results from PISA are invaluable toeducators, social policy analysts, and humanrights advocacy groups. These researchersand analysts have access to importantinformation that can be used in developingprograms to deal with both short-term andlong-term problems or barriers that youngadults may face in their pursuit of highereducation or in gaining work experience.Information from the survey helps to evaluatethe effectiveness of existing programs andpractices, to determine the most appropriateage at which to introduce new programs, andto better target programs to those most inneed .

Young adults themselves are able to see howtheir own experiences compare with those ofother young adults.

119

meet the challenges of the future?

Are they able to analyze, reasonand communicate their ideaseffectively?

Are some kinds of school policiesand practices more effective thanothers?


Average scores and confidence intervals, by province and country, for each PCAP 2007 domain

Reading as primary domain

Curricula across Canada identify comprehension, interpretation, and response andreflection as major organizing aspects of reading literacy. In this assessment, threesubdomains of the integrated process of reading are assessed: comprehension,interpretation, and response to the text (which includes response and reflection).

Comprehension

Students understand the explicit and implicit information provided by the text. In particular,they understand the vocabulary, parts, elements, and events of the text.

Interpretation

Students make meaning by analyzing and synthesizing the parts/elements/events todevelop a broader perspective and/or meaning for the text. They may identify thetheme/thesis and support that with references to details, events, symbols, patterns, and/ortext features.

Response to text

120

p

In responding, the readers engage with the text in a number of possible ways :

making personal connections between aspects of the text and their own real/vicariousprior experiences, knowledge, values and/or point of view;

responding emotionally to central ideas or aspects of the text; taking an evaluative stance about the quality or value of the text,

possibly in relation to other texts or social or cultural factors.

The curricula across Canada in reading generally distinguish between personal and criticalresponses.

Performance descriptors for scores at each level of the general scale

Level 1 scores (379 and below)The student demonstrates a partial understanding of some fiction and non-fiction texts. Thestudent understands directly stated information, relying on familiar vocabulary, concretedetails, and explicit statements. In interpreting texts, the student provides a simplified orgeneral perspective, often relying on directly stated conclusions or connecting someaspects of the text to one another. The student demonstrates understanding of how somecontent and text features are used to accomplish particular purposes. In respondingpersonally a.d critically to texts, the student’s responses are often vague or general


Level 2 scores (380 to 575)The student comprehends, interprets, and responds to a variety of texts in a clear andreasonable manner. The student understands both directly stated information andinformation implied by the text. The student connects general statements and supportingdetails, draws conclusions about the broader meaning and intent of the text, and interpretsspecific parts of the text based on inferences and figurative language. The studentdemonstrates knowledge of how texts are structured and organized to accomplish a varietyof purposes. The student’s personal and critical responses are supported with references tothe text and other sources.

Level 3 scores (576 and above)The student comprehends, interprets, and responds to a variety of texts in a thoughtful andelaborated manner. The student understands directly stated information and informationimplied by the text, including implications arising from subtle aspects of style and tone. Thestudent demonstrates insightful interpretation of the text by synthesizing several elements orby making a thoughtful analysis of one or more significant elements, often relying on subtlerelationships among elements and ideas. The student demonstrates knowledge and insightof how writers structure texts and use other elements of style to accomplish a variety ofpurposes. The student provides extended personal and critical responses, sometimesincluding social and cultural implications or literary evaluation.

Mathematics assessment

The mathematics component in PCAP 2007 is aligned with the jurisdictions’ own curriculaas well as the standards of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). The

121

The mathematics component in PCAP 2007 is aligned with the jurisdictions own curriculaas well as the standards of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). Theoverriding principle of the assessment is that the application of mathematics is an integratedact in which the skills and concepts of various content areas are inherently linked.

Organization of the domain

For the purposes of PCAP, the domain of mathematics was divided into four subdomainsand three processes. The four subdomains are :

numbers and operations (percentages, equivalent representations, rates, ratio and proportionality);

geometry and measurement (properties of 2-D figures and 3-D shapes,relative position, transformations and measurement);

patterns and relationships (patterns and algebraic expressions, linear relations and equations);


data management and probability (data collection and analysis, experimental andtheoretical probability. The three processes are:

problem solving; communication and representation; reasoning connections.

The subdomains are traditional groupings of skills and knowledge, while the processes areused in the application of all subdomains. The PCAP 2007 mathematics componentincluded test items drawing from the specifications of all four subdomains and related to thecompetencies (processes) of problem solving, communication/representations, andreasoning/connections. In addition, an attempt was made to ensure that the contexts of thevarious scenarios were drawn from situations that were relevant, appropriate, and sensiblefor Canadian 13-year-olds.

The scope of this assessment was limited to those concepts and skills encountered andused by most 13-year-olds in their courses of study in Canada. However, it was not acomprehensive assessment of all the concepts and skills that a particular system expects13-year-olds to master.

Science assessment

The PCAP science assessment is founded on a definition of scientific literacy thatadvocates that students’ evolving competencies in using science-related attitudes, skills,and knowledge as well as an understanding of the nature of science enable them to conductinquiries, solve problems, and make evidence-based decisions about science-relatedissues Embedded in this definition of scientific literacy is the supposition that students have

122

issues. Embedded in this definition of scientific literacy is the supposition that students haveknowledge of the life sciences, physical sciences (chemistry and physics), and earth andspace sciences, as well as an understanding of the nature of science as a humanendeavour.

Like the mathematics assessment, the science assessment comprises items associatedwith the competencies and subdomains that provide opportunities for students todemonstrate their use of science-related attitudes, skills, and knowledge. Thecompetencies and the combination of the five interrelated subdomains as defined bycurricula across Canada, as well as the statements in the CMEC's Common Framework ofScience Learning Outcomes , provided the foundation for the development of test items.

Reporting scales for the minor domains

As was the case for reading, one mean scale score for each of the minor domains has beenused for reporting the achievement results. The pan-Canadian mean score was set at 500with a standard deviation of 100.


Pan-Canadian Results in Reading by LanguageChart 131

PCAP (2007)Reading

476

477

478

479

486

486

491

492

503

505

524

532

Manitoba (A)

Nova Scotia (F)

Ontario (F)

Quebec (A)

British Columbia (A)

Yukon (A)

Alberta (A)

Canada (A)

Ontario (A)

Alberta (F)

Canada (F)

Quebec (F)

Ranking of jurisdictions on PCAP (2007) ReadingAssessment

123

N.B. Averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.

436

458

459

464

466

471

471

473

476

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Manitoba (F)

New Brunswick (F)

Prince Edward Island (A)

Newfoundland and Labrador (A)

New Brunswick (A)

Nova Scotia (A)

Saskatchewan (A)

British Columbia (F)

Manitoba (A)

Scores


Distribution (%) of Performance Levels in Reading by LanguageChart 132

PCAP (2007)Reading

17

17

17

16

16

15

14

14

13

12

11

11

10

9

72

67

65

72

70

72

77

58

71

70

73

55

67

54

11

16

18

12

14

13

9

28

16

18

16

34

23

37

New Brunswick (A)

Nova Scotia (F)

Yukon (A)

Nova Scotia (A)

Quebec (A)

Manitoba (A)

Saskatchewan (A)

Alberta (F)


Canada (A)

Alberta (A)

Canada (F)

Ontario (A)

Quebec (F)

Percentage of Students by Performance Level on PCAP

124

31

24

22

19

19

19

17

58

62

55

70

69

62

72

11

14

23

11

12

19

11

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Manitoba (F)

New Brunswick (F)




Ontario (F)

New Brunswick (A)

Level 1 (%) Level 2 (%) Level 3 (%)


PCAP (2007)Reading

Pan-Canadian Results in Reading by Subdomain and Language — Comprehension

Chart 133

480

480

482

483

483

489

492

493

499

503

524

531

Saskatchewan (A)

Nova Scotia (F)

Nova Scotia (A)

Manitoba (A)

Quebec (A)


Canada (A)

Alberta (A)

Ontario (A)

Alberta (F)

Canada (F)

Quebec (F)

Ranking in Reading (comprehension) on PCAP (2007)Reading

125

445

466

472

473

475

477

479

479

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Manitoba (F)


New Brunswick (F)


New Brunswick (A)

Ontario (F)

Yukon (A)


Scores



PCAP (2007)Reading

Chart 134 Pan-Canadian Results in Reading by Subdomain and Language — Interpretation

477

482

482

483

486

489

491

492

503

509

525

532

Quebec (A)

Ontario (F)

Nova Scotia (F)



Yukon (A)

Alberta (A)

Canada (A)

Ontario (A)

Alberta (F)

Canada (F)

Quebec (F)

Ranking in Reading (interpretation) on PCAP 2007

126

444

457

459

463

467

469

469

475

477

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Manitoba (F)


New Brunswick (F)

New Brunswick (A)

Nova Scotia (A)

Saskatchewan (A)


Manitoba (A)

Quebec (A)

Scores



PCAP (2007)Reading

Chart 135 Pan-Canadian Results in Reading by Subdomain and Language — Response to Text

476

480

482

484

489

493

494

495

499

506

516

522

Manitoba (A)

Nova Scotia (F)

Quebec (A)

Ontario (F)


Alberta (A)

Yukon (A)

Canada (A)

Alberta (F)

Ontario (A)

Canada (F)

Quebec (F)

Ranking in Reading (response to text) on PCAP (2007)

127

445

458

462

467

469

470

470

471

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Manitoba (F)

Princ Edward Island (A)

New Brunswick (F)

New Brunswick (A)


Nova Scotia (A)


Saskatchewan (A)

Scores



Chart 136Pan-Canadian Results in Mathematics by Language

PCAP (2007)Mathematics

471

474

478

478

479

484

496

500

508

510

512

518

Ontario (F)

Manitoba (F)


Alberta (F)

Manitoba (A)


Canada (A)

Alberta (A)

Ontario (A)

Quebec (A)

Canada (F)

Quebec (F)

Ranking of Jurisdictions in Mathematics on PCAP (2007)

128

448

449

457

460

461

462

464

467

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Yukon (A)


Nova Scotia (A)

New Brunswick (F)

Saskatchewan (A)

New Brunswick (A)

Nova Scotia (F)


Scores

N.B. Averages are statistically significant only if their confidence levels do not overlap.


Pan-Canadian Results in Science by Language

PCAP (2007)Science

Chart 137

479

480

485

485

488

496

499

503

512

514

516

524

Nova Scotia (A)

Saskatchewan (A)

Ontario (F)



Canada (A)

Ontario (A)

Nova Scotia (F)

Canada (F)

Alberta (F)

Quebec (F)

Alberta (A)

Ranking of Jurisdictions in Science on PCAP 2007

129

458

460

464

467

468

470

475

477

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Yukon (A)

New Brunswick (F)


Quebec (A)

New Brunswick (A)

Manitoba (F)


Manitoba (A)

Scores



Average scores and confidence intervals, by province and country, for each PISA domain

130


PISA 2000Reading

The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100.

Chart 138 Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: READING

507

516

517

517

521

522

523

525

527

528

529

529

529

533

534

536

538

546

550

AustriaSweden

Newfoundland and Lab.Prince Edward Island

Nova ScotiaJapan

United KingdomKorea

IrelandAustralia

New ZealandSaskatchewan

ManitobaOntario

CANADAQuebec

British ColumbiaFinlandAlberta

Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2000 reading assessment

N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.

131

396

422

441

458

462

470

474

479

480

483

484

487

492

493

494

497

500

501

504

505

505

507

507

507

375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

BrazilMexico

LuxembourgLatvia

Russian FederationPortugalGreecePoland

HungaryLichtenstein

GemanyItaly

Czech RepublicSpain

SwitzerlandDenmark

OECD AverageNew BrunswickUnited States

FranceNorwayIceland

BelgiumAustria

Scores


Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country : MATHEMATICS

Chart 139


PISA 2000Mathematics

514

514

515

517

520

524

525

529

529

533

533

533

534

536

537

547

547

550

557

IcelandDenmark

AustriaFrance

BelgiumOntario

SaskatchewanUnited Kingdom

SwitzerlandCANADAManitobaAustralia

British ColumbiaFinland

New ZealandKorea

AlbertaQuebec

Japan


Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2000 mathematics assessment

132

334

387

446

447

454

457

463

470

476

478

488

490

493

498

499

500

503

506

509

510

512

513

514

514

300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

BrazilMexico

LuxembourgGreece

PortugalItaly

LatviaPolandSpain

Russian FederationHungary

GermanyUnited States

Czech RepublicNorway

OECD AverageIreland

New BrunswickNewfoundland and Lab.

SwedenPrince Edward Island

Nova ScotiaLichtenstein

Iceland

Scores


PISA 2000Science

Chart 140 Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country : SCIENCE


511

512

513

516

516

519

522

522

527

528

528

529

532

533

538

541

546

550

552

Czech RepublicSwedenIreland

Nova ScotiaNewfoundland and Lab.

AustriaSaskatchewan

OntarioManitobaAustralia

New ZealandCANADA

United KingdomBritish Columbia

FinlandQuebecAlbertaJapanKorea


Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2000 science assessment

133

375

422

443

459

460

460

461

476

478

481

483

487

491

496

496

496

496

497

499

500

500

500

508

511

350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

BrazilMexico

LuxembourgPortugal

LatviaRussian Federation

GreeceLichtenstein

ItalyDenmark

PolandGermany

SpainSwitzerland

BelgiumIceland

HungaryNew Brunswick

United StatesOECD Average

NorwayFrance

Prince Edward IslandCzech Republic

Scores


Chart 141

PISA 2003Reading

Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: READING

499500500503507510512513513514515520521522525525525528530534535543543

SwitzerlandOECD Average

NorwayNew Brunswick

BelgiumHong Kong-China

SaskatchewanNetherlandsNova Scotia

SwedenIreland

ManitobaNewfoundland and Lab.

New ZealandLichtenstein

AustraliaQuebec

CANADAOntario

KoreaBritish Columbia

AlbertaFinland

N.B. Differences in scores ares statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.


134

375

382400403

412420

434441442

469472476478479481482489491491491492492495495496497498498499

350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

TunisiaIndonesia

MexicoBrazil

Serbia and MontenegroThailandUruguay

TurkeyRussian Federation

SlovakiaGreece

ItalyPortugal

LuxembourgSpain

HungaryCzech Republic

LatviaAustria

GermanyIceland

DenmarkPrince Edward Island

United StatesFrancePoland

Macao-ChinaJapan

Switzerland

Scores



Chart 142


Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country : MATHEMATICS

515515516516517523524527527528529530532534536537538538542544549550

IcelandNova Scotia

Czech RepublicSaskatchewan

Newfoundland and Lab.New Zealand

AustraliaSwitzerland

Macao-ChinaManitobaBelgiumOntario

CANADAJapan

LichtensteinQuebec

NetherlandsBritish Columbia

KoreaFinlandAlberta

Hong Kong-China



135

356

359360

385417422423

437445

466466468

483483485490490493495498500500503503506509511512514

325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

BrazilTunisia

IndonesiaMexico

ThailandUruguay

TurkeySerbia and Montenegro

GreeceItaly

PortugalRussian Federation

United StatesLatviaSpain

HungaryPoland

LuxembourgNorway

SlovakiaOECD Average

Prince Edward IslandIreland

GermanyAustria

SwedenFrance

New BrunswickDenmark

Scores


PISA 2003Science

Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: SCIENCE

Chart 143

505506506509511512513514515519520521523524525525525527

538539539

548548

Nova ScotiaSaskatchewan

SwedenBelgiumFrance

ManitobaSwitzerland

Newfoundland and Lab.Ontario

CANADAQuebec

New ZealandCzech Republic

NetherlandsMacao-China

AustraliaLichtenstein

British ColumbiaCorée

AlbertaHong Kong-China

JapanFinland



136

385

390395

405429434436438

468475481483484486487489489489491491494495495498498502503505505

350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

TunisiaBrazil

IndonesiaMexico

ThailandTurkey

Serbia and MontenegroUruguayPortugal

DenmarkGreece

LuxembourgNorway

ItalySpain

Prince Edward IslandLatvia

Russian FederationAustria

United StatesOECD Average

IcelandSlovakia

New BrunswickPoland

GermanyHungary

IrelandNova Scotia

Scores


PISA 2006Reading

Chart 144 Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: READING

508

510

513

514

516

517

521

522

527

528

534

535

536

547

556

Poland

Lichtenstein

Australia

Newfoundland and Labrador

Manitoba

Ireland

New Zealand

Quebec

Canada

British Columbia

Ontario

Alberta

China-Hong Kong

Finland

Korea



137

488

490

491

492

494

494

495

495

496

497

497

498

499

501

501

505

507

507

507

275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

France

Austria

OECD Average

China-Macao

Slovenia

Denmark

United Kingdom

Germany

Chinese Taipei

Prince Edward Island

New Brunswick

Japan

Switzerland

Estonia

Belgium

Nova Scotia

Sweden

Saskatchewan

Netherlands

Scores


PISA 2006Reading

Chart 145 (continued)

Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: READING (continued)

447

460

461

466

469

470

472

477

479

479

482

483

484

484

Turkey

Greece

Spain

Slovakia

Italy

Lithuania

Portugal

Croatia

Luxemburg

Latvia

Hungary

Czech Republic

Norway

Iceland



138

285

312

353

374

380

385

392

393

393

396

401

401

402

410

413

417

439

440

442

275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

Kyrgyzstan

Qatar

Azerbaijan

Argentina

Tunisia

Colombia

Montenegro

Indonesia

Brazil

Romania

Serbia

Jordan

Bulgaria

Mexico

Uruguay

Thailand

Israel

Russian Federation

Chile

Scores



Chart 146 Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country : MATHEMATICS

522

523

523

525

525

526

527

530

530

531

540

547

547

548

549

New Zealand

Japan

British Columbia

Lichtenstein

China-Macao

Ontario

Canada

Switzerland

Alberta

Netherlands

Quebec

Korea

China-Hong Kong

Finland

Chinese Taipei



139

496

498

501

501

502

504

504

505

506

506

506

507

507

510

513

515

520

520

521

275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

France

OECD Average

Prince Edward Island

Ireland

Sweden

Slovenia

Germany

Austria

Nova Scotia

New Brunswick

Iceland

Saskatchewan

Newfoundland and Labrador

Czech Republic

Denmark

Estonia

Australia

Belgium

Manitoba

Scores


Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: MATHEMATICS (continued)



462

466

467

474

476

476

480

486

486

490

490

491

492

495

495

Italy

Portugal

Croatia

United States

Russian Federation

Azerbaijan

Spain

Lithuania

Latvia

Norway

Luxemburg

Hongrie

Slovakia

United Kingdom

Poland



140

311

318

365

370

370

381

384

391

399

406

411

413

415

417

424

427

435

442

459

275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

Kyrgyzistan

Qatar

Tunisia

Colombia

Brazil

Argentina

Jordan

Indonesia

Montenegro

Mexico

Chile

Bulgaria

Romania

Thailand

Turkey

Uruguay

Serbia

Israel

Greece

Scores


Chart 147 Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: SCIENCE

PISA 2006Science

The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100

522

523

525

526

527

530

531

531

531

532

534

537

539

542

550

563

Corée

Manitoba

Pays-Bas

Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador

Australie

Nouvelle-Zélande

Québec

Japon

Estonie

Taipei chinois

Canada

Ontario

Colombie-Britannique

Chine-Hong Kong

Alberta

Finlande



141

495

496

498

500

503

504

506

508

509

510

511

511

512

513

515

516

517

519

520

522

300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

France

Danemark

Pologne

Moyenne OCDE

Suède

Hongrie

Nouveau-Brunswick

Irlande

Île-du-Prince-Édouard

Belgique

Chine-Macao

Autriche

Suisse

République tchèque

Royaume-Uni

Allemagne

Saskatchewan

Slovénie

Nouvelle-Écosse

Liechtenstein

Scores


Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: SCIENCE (continued)

PISA 2006Science


The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100 454

473

474

475

479

486

487

488

488

488

489

490

491

493

Israël

Grèce

Portugal

Italie

Fédération de Russie

Luxembourg

Norvège

Espagne

Slovaquie

Lituanie

États-Unis

Lettonie

Islande

Croatie

N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant if their confidence levels do not overlap.


142

322

349

382

386

388

390

391

393

410

412

418

421

422

424

428

434

436

438

300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575

Kyrgyzstan

Qatar

Azerbaijan

Tunisia

Colombia

Brazil

Argentina

Indonesia

Mexico

Montenegro

Romania

Thailand

Jordan

Turkey

Uruguay

Bulgaria

Serbia

Chile

Scores

Conclusion

Conclusion

This marks the sixteenth year of publication of New Brunswick’s provincial examination results by school and district. The Department of Education releases these results to meet the requirements of accountability and transparency.

The production of this report is the outcome of a lengthy process of preparation and then compilation of the data gathered from the provincial examinations administered in the 2009-2010 school year. This year, an effort was made to reduce the size of the report while maintaining the level of information presented. The Department chose the most relevant data so as to produce a report accessible to everyone.

These results show all education partners and decision makers how New Brunswick students are doing in the subjects that make up the compulsory portion of the curriculum .

143

Conclusion

This marks the sixteenth year of publication of New Brunswick’s provincial examination results by school and district. The Department of Education releases these results to meet the requirements of accountability and transparency.

The production of this report is the outcome of a lengthy process of preparation and then compilation of the data gathered from the provincial examinations administered in the 2009-2010 school year. This year, an effort was made to reduce the size of the report while maintaining the level of information presented. The Department chose the most relevant data so as to produce a report accessible to everyone.

These results show all education partners and decision makers how New Brunswick students are doing in the subjects that make up the compulsory portion of the curriculum .

We would appreciate receiving your comments by mail or e-mail once you have read this report. Please send them to the addresses indicated at the beginning. The Department will examine your questionnaire responses and comments with great care.

Note, too, that school principals and district superintendents, as well as appropriate departmental staff, are available to answer any further questions you may have.

Provincial Examination Results - New Brunswick · 2018. 9. 1. · Provincial Examination Results...

Documents

Transcript of Provincial Examination Results - New Brunswick · 2018. 9. 1. · Provincial Examination Results...