Presentation2

17
Mobile/desktop user analysis with the effects on email interaction patterns Bo Ma [email protected]

Transcript of Presentation2

Page 1: Presentation2

Mobile/desktop user analysis with the effects on email

interaction patternsBo Ma

[email protected]

Page 2: Presentation2

Data Event Type Data Source Notes

Email Send Event /data/tracking/EmailSendEvent

Get the Email send details like click type, section name, type, order, position, size.

Email Click Event /data/tracking/EmailClickEvent Get Email click number

Email View Event /data/tracking/EmailViewEvent Get Email view number

Page 3: Presentation2

Preliminary Observations

• From above data, we can know which user click on which email and which specific clicks in the email.

• So I count the distribution on different clicks and click position for both mobile and desktop

Page 4: Presentation2

Click Distribution

Page 5: Presentation2

Group the click by Section

• We actually interested in the module section order and click in the email.

• So I group the click by SectionNo.• There are at most 7 sections in

‘nu_digest’ emailKeySectionSeq SectionName

0 positions1 milestones2 shares3 profile4 endorsements

5 connections6 pymk

Page 6: Presentation2

Section Click Distribution

Page 7: Presentation2

Section Click Distribution

Page 8: Presentation2

AnalysisInteresting things:• some section in position 5 , but it has more click

distribution than section in position 4.Bias:• what is the order for 7 section? • Is there difference between the section type.• What is the section size?• It includes all the order and all the size.• Does Mobile has more Uctr than Desktop?

Page 9: Presentation2

Uctr in this question

Page 10: Presentation2

• As the position increases the Uctr decreases.

• 3Profile’s Uctr is higher than 2shares with section size 3 on pos 0.

• 6Pymk and 5connection’s Uctr is higher than the 4endorsements.

• This shows us the original order is not optimized

• The Desktop’s Uctr is higher than the mobile’s Uctr.

Page 11: Presentation2

• For endorsement:• As the section pos

increases the Uctr drops.

• As the section size increases the Uctr drops.

• But it is not the same trend for some section

Page 12: Presentation2

• Big difference for section shares.

• As the section size increases, the Uctr does not drops.

• For pos >=1 , the Uctr drops a little. Position is not as

• This shows that shares’s performance is different from others.

Page 13: Presentation2

• With same section size and same section pos.

• Pymk and connections Uctr is higher than the endorsement

Page 14: Presentation2

Bias• But above chart still have bias.• For example:• For section endorsements,with section size 2,

and section pos 2.

• We can have format:• 1, shares;endorsements;pymk• 2, shares;endorsements;connections

Page 15: Presentation2

Uctr Difference between setion name on Same Format

Format section name Uctr

shares;endorsements shares 0.070833333

shares;endorsements endorsements 0.027083333

shares;endorsements;connections shares 0.067493113

shares;endorsement;connections endorsements 0.022956841

shares;endorsements;connections connections 0.02892562

shares;endorsements;pymk shares 0.073609732

shares;endorsements;pymk endorsements 0.025819265

shares;endorsements;pymk pymk 0.02599861

Pymk and connection’ Uctr are higher than edorsement.Pymk increase the Uctr for the first section shares.

Page 16: Presentation2

Pymk increases Uctr on first section

Format section name Uctr Format section name Uctr increase rate

endorsements;connections endorsements 0.069423175

endorsements;connections;pymk endorsements 0.071578619 3.01%

  connections 0.032272702   connections 0.030748472 -4.96%

        pymk 0.021006685  

profile;endorsements profile 0.140718563

profile;endorsements;pymk profile 0.174781765 19.49%

  endorsements 0.041916168   endorsements 0.027158099 -54.34%

        pymk 0.025800194  

Page 17: Presentation2

• Thank you!• You can find more detailed analysis on

Email User Analysis Wiki