Case presentation
-
Upload
lubnaaborob -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
130 -
download
0
Transcript of Case presentation
Case presentationDone by : Dr.Raed Al-Abbadi3rd year orthodontic resident
Supervised by :Dr.Ahmad Al-Tarawneh
Dr.Raed Al-RbataDr.Nancy Sarayrah
Patient details
• name :Z.A• Age: 15 years• Occupation : Student • Nationality :Jordanian
Chief complaint
• My teeth in upper jaw are spaced• Something wrong with bite on right side of my mouth
• Medical history : denied any medical history • Dental history : routine dental visits• Trauma or habits : denied any .• TMJ findings : nothing abnormal • Displacement : yes
Extra oral examinationskeletal and soft tissue assessment
Frontal view• Symmetrical face• square face• Competent lips
Extra oral examinationskeletal and soft tissue assessment
Frontal smile• Thin lips • Normal level occlusal plane (no canting).• upper midline to facial mildline : diastema ??Middle of it >>Coincident.• lower midline to upper midline:Lower midline shifted to right• Increased buccal corridor • Increased incisal show
Extra oral examinationskeletal and soft tissue assessment
Profile view• Slightly convex profile • normal nasolabial angle• Average frontonasal angle • Obtuse labiomental angle• Average throat length • Average throat angle• Average lower facial height• Average FMPA
Intra oral examinationFrontal
• Fair oral hygiene• Class I incisal classification • Reduced overjet• Missing upper right and left lateral incisors • Midline diastema• Fluorosis on lower right lateral and canine• Cross bite on right side ( seems on both
but lower tilited lingually )• Reduced overbite • Lower midline shift to right by 1-2 mm• Normal oral mucosa.
Right side
• Class II ½ unit molar relationship
• Canine relationship full unit class II
• Caries on upper right central • Cross bite on right side ( 3,4,5,6)• Amalgam filling on lower right
1st molar
Left side
• Class I molar relationship• Canine relationship class II
¼ unit• Caries on upper left
central• Retained lower left
primary 2nd molar • Calculus on upper left 1st
molar
Upper arch
• U shaped arch• Spacing • Missing laterals on both
sides• Rotated 1st molars• Teeth present 1,3,4,5,6,7
Lower arch
• U shaped arch• Normal tongue size• Carious lower right 2nd molar• Rotated lower right 2nd premolar• Retained lower right primary 2nd
molar• Lower right 1st molars filled with
amalgam• Teeth present 1-7
Study model analysisAnteroposterior
• Class II canine on right • Class II ½ unit molar
• Class II 1/2 unit canine • Class I molar
OJ = 1mm on upper right central , 2mm on upper left
Vertical
• Reduced overbite
Transverse
• Cross bite on right side.• Lower midline shifted to
right by 2mm .
Curve of spee
Left side Right side
flat4 mm depth
study model analysis Maxillary arch
• Asymmetrical • Inter canine width=28• Intermolar width =43• Rotated upper right and left 1st molar
study model analysis mandibular arch
• Asymmetrical • Inter canine width=30• Intermolar width =43• Rotated lower right 2nd premolar• Retained lower left primary 2nd molar
Teeth widths 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 56.5 7 7.5 **6.9 9.5 9.5 **6.9 7.5 6.5 6.57 7 6.5 6 6 6 6 6.5 6.5 85 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 E
If open space applied to replace missing laterals Mesio distal needed according to anterior Bolton ratio >>>37/0.772 = 2x+34 >>>2x =47.9-34=13.9X=13.9/2=6.95mm
Space analysis
• Upper: Available space =70 ,,, Required =74.5 ( need 4.5 mm )
• Lower : Available space =67.5,,, Required = 65.5 ( there is extra 2mm )
Royal college of London analysis Lower arch Upper arch
Crowding / spacing +1( estimated after extraction of lower left E ) +1 de-rototaion of lower right 5
-4.5
Leveling curve of spee -1.5(4mm) on left side 0Arch width change 0 +5mm ( .5mm for every
1mm increase in width )10 mm expansion>>+5
Insicior A/p change 0 0Angulation change 0 0Inclination change 0 0Result +0.5 +0.5
IOTN-dental component =great 4.h
IOTN aesthetic component =5
Opt
• amalgam filled lower right 1st molar• Endo treated lower left 1st molar , flled with amalgam • Wisdom teeth present in lower arch • Missing upper laterals + lower left 2nd premolar • Retained lower left primary 2nd molar , resorbed roots• Mesial tilted lower left 1st molar
Lateral cephalogramNormal Value
SNA 84 81 +- 3
SNB 81 78 +- 3
ANB 3 2-4S-N/ANS-PNS 3.8 8 +- 3
Corrected ANB 3MMPA 26.9 27 +- 3
UAFH 51.7LAFH 68.2
LAFH % 56.8%
55 +- 2
U1/Mx 111 108 +- 6
L1/Mn 92 93 +- 6
IAA 128 133 +- 10
Wits Appraisal 2 0 + 1.77 mm
Case summary • ZA is 15 years old medically fit female .She has attended the orthodontic
clinic with esthetic concern related to her upper teeth , her chief complaint is spaced upper teeth and smoothing wronge on right side when biting , she has fair oral hygiene and localized calculus related to upper left 6, she has class I malocclusion on skeletal base class I with class II ½ unit molar on right , class II full unit canine on right , class II 1/2 unit on left side , reduced OJ , reduced OB , cross bite on right side ,deep curve of spee on right side , lower midline shifted to right by 2mm , midline diastema , spacing in upper arch , complicated by missing upper right and left laterals and missing lower left 2nd premolar, rotated lower right 2nd premolar , retained lower left primary 2nd premolar .
Problem list • Oral health :
• Calculus on upper left molar
• Skeletal • Constricted maxilla
• Soft tissue • Slightly convex profile• Obtuse labiomental angle
• Dental • Increased buccal corridor
• Increased incisal show• Reduced overjet
• Missing upper right and left lateral incisors
• Missing lower left 2nd premolar
• Carious upper right and left centrals
• Midline diastema
• Fluorosis on lower right lateral and canine
• Cross bite on right side ( seems on both but lower tilited lingually )
• Reduced overbite
• Lower midline shift to right by 1-2 mm
Class II ½ unit molar relationship & Canine relationship full unit class II on right sideCanine relationship class II ¼ unit on left sideRotated upper 1st molarsRetained lower right primary 2nd molar4 mm depth of COS on left sideSpacing in upper arch
Treatment aims• Stabilization of periodontal condition.
• Treatment of carious teeth .
• Attain a normal width of maxilla
• Level and align arches.
• Correct centerlines.
• Correct crossbite on right side
• Normalize OJ and OB.
• Achieve Class I canine and molar relationship
• Open space for upper lateral incisors and maintain space of lower left 2nd premolar.
• Coordinate dental arches with good buccal interdigitation.
• Retain the corrected results.
Treatment plan1. OHI2. Treatment of carious teeth .3. Rapid maxillary expansion.4. Modified TPA.5. upper and lower fixed appliance ( Roth 0.022’’)
Open space for upper laterals for future prosthesis Consider disking lower left E
6. Retention : upper permanent retention and Hawley retainer with acrylic teeth in place of laterals , lower Hawley retainer .
justification• Rapid maxillary expansion with hyrax is good for her case because we want a skeletal effect more
than dental effect .
• Expand until we overcorrect the width ( palatal cusps of upper on lingual inclines of buccal cusps of lower ) in anticipation of some relapse.( lee 1999)
• Modified TPA to derotate upper 1st molars .
• Fixed Appliance is needed because of • Bodily teeth movement is required.
• Alignment of teeth.
• Close the extraction spaces.
• Preserve / correct teeth torque.
• Roth prescription slot 0.022 because teeth are in normal inclination and average torque is needed.
• Leave lower left primary 2nd molar as natural space maintainer for lower left 2nd premolar until restore it with a prosthesis .
• Fixed retainers are indicated for long-term retention of the labial segments, particularly for generalized spacing and for retention of a midline diastema (Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. (4th ed.), Chapter 17, St Louis, Mosby Elsevier, 2007)
• Hawley retainers to retain the expanded maxillary arch because of its rigidity .
The End